Death Penalty in Juveniles
For the past hundred years there has been a arguments involving the opinion on the death penalty. Most people see is as inhumane or the easy way out. They rather let inmates spend years in jail serving the time that the judge or jury sees justice. Others yo would call the anion twisted side of the world, wanting the people that committed these crimes to be put to death in some pretty horrific ways. The electric chair, gas chamber, lethal injection and so many more development in many different countries with no remorse. Ages ranging 30-55 is were most death role inmates received the death penalty but what would happen if the person on death row was a juvenile. http://www.capitalpunishmentuk.org/gascham.html The death death penalty in juveniles are both constitutional and unconstitutional. Depending on the seriousness of the crime. It can serve
…show more content…
Juveniles should be trialed as adult and receiving major punishment when committing a capital offense. When being a danger to society as a child under the age of 18, the chances of this child reversing his or her way is slim to one. But as always that one can make a difference. Children need role models to shape them in to a law bidding citizen. With out the proper knowledge they are not learning right from wrong.
Constitutional. People that receive the death penalty have done some of the most worst crimes known to man. They have stolen, raped, killed, etc. these crimes can by done anytime, any place, anywhere, any age. So why is age even a factor? The Mariana rights state the “ that a person is proven guilty in the court of the law” this statement does not have a age requirement. A child is a child just like an adult is an adult but a killer is a killer. Putting there Juveniles back into society can cause nothing but but trouble and safety