ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

655 Words3 Pages

Because of all the school shooting around the United States people are pushing for more gun restrictions, but the guns are not the problem, it is the people who commit the crime that are the problem. The most deaths in the United States are caused by Tobacco use, but nobody tries as hard to get them outlawed. Tobacco use kills approximately five-hundred twenty-nine thousand people per year, just in the United States. There are about eleven thousand gun related homicides per year in the United States(Becker, "Gun Control Statistics That Reasonable People Should Know"). Guns are used for more than just criminal actions, they are used for other things like protection, and hunting. If guns in the United States become outlawed people will not be able to protect themselves from armed criminals as well as they would if they had a gun. There are also many Americans who will not give up their guns, and some may even fight for them causing more deaths in the Untied States. There is a reason that the Second Amendment was put into the Constitution. The Amendment states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, …show more content…

One interpretation is used on protecting gun rights and the other is used to help gun control. The gun rights version is that all United States citizens should be able to own and use a firearm when and how they want within the confines of the law. The other vision is that of the gun control advocates their interpretation is that guns should only be used by a state regulated Militia. Both of these descriptions are valid interpretations of the Second Amendment and can be used to argue both points of view in a debate. Since the Amendment can be used on both sides it is unwise to bring up the topic in an argument. Unless the Supreme Court rules in favor of one party. Then that party can use the Amendment to get their ideals

Show More
Related
455 Words | 2 Pages

The US Constitution consists of ten amendments that govern all states. More importantly, these ten amendments established the rights of the people, and created the foundation of our government. Ever since the creation of the Constitution in 1787, the objective for creating the US Constitution and its amendments, has withstood the scrutiny of subjective interpretation. In today’s world, demands for government mandated gun control seems to provoke endless heated arguments over individual and big government interpretations of the second amendment in relation to the individual rights of the people.

Read More
1853 Words | 8 Pages

The idea that the Founders wanted to put the citizens on an equal footing as the Government to provide a defence against oppression is also no longer a valid interpretation of the Second Amendment. The United States Federal Government has a vast arsenal of weapons at its disposal including Nuclear weapons, advocates of the Second Amendment would have to advocate for these weapons to be made available to all citizens. It is clear that the second Amendment does not have the same meaning as it did when it was ratified. The founding fathers did not consider the advancements of technology that exist today, or never considered the Amendment as an individual right but rather a group right for a recognised, well-regulated militia. The NRA has lobbied effectively to prevent the control and appropriate regulation of firearms in the United States of America and has taken ownership of the Second Amendment as a Battle cry against Federal Government.

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

Its enduring impact is through controversy and many debates. The Denotation and Speculation of the Second Amendment Amendment II reads, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” “Amendment 2 legal definition of Amendment” a website talking about the amendment, acknowledges that the amendment says it allows firearms, but with

Read More
229 Words | 1 Pages

The second amendment and the input of gun control laws has been a big issue, especially when the number of mass murders and shootings are continuing to grow in the United States. Putting a limit or constraint on people who own guns will not stop the problem. Putting a limit may hold someone back for a short period of time, but somehow will still find one, purchase it, and use it. Some people just own a gun for the simple purpose of protection. Three major components of the second amendment will be affected if some type of gun control were to take place and those three components are concealed carry, weapons of mass destruction, and invasion of privacy.

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

Our Second Amendment right should be amended, not abolished.. Imagine that you’re at home, in bed, when you hear the door knob on your locked, front door jiggle. You start panicking, but you then remember that you own a gun and know how to use it. With that gun, you can defend yourself from the intruder. However, some people believe you shouldn’t be able to own a gun.

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

The Second Amendment gives legal entitlement to bear weapons and ammunition if someone wants or needs it. But the controversy is driven by the word “entitlement,” which is something that provides benefits to any individual meeting certain eligibility requirements given to a person by the government. The Second Amendment’s purpose is to protect a person from the government, but the entitlement is given to a person from the government: the same people they are trying to be protected from. This confusion makes the amendment arcane since it holds no meaning in the modern world.

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

The shootings that have happened in schools throughout America over the past few months has divided Americans on what they need to do as a nation to stop additional shootings from occouring. Many believe that creating new laws on buying weapons by requiring background checks, holding adults liable for the actions of their kids and requiring safety devices on weapons to stop youngsters will stop these massacres in schools from happening, it 's a step in the right direction, however, it 's not good enough nor is it effective enough, America needs well regulated gun laws and the politicians must understand that the laws should be based on facts, not opinions. There are several problems that need to be looked at in order to determine which laws are necessary. According to a recent study, America has the highest amount gun related deaths every year in the world. “Germany, has 371 gun related deaths, France 255, Canada 165, the united kingdom 68, Australia 65, Japan 39 and America, 11,200”.

Read More
1289 Words | 6 Pages

The Second Amendment as one of the ten Amendments known as the Bill of Rights was ratified on December 15, 1791. The amendment reads in full: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The Amendment is obviously quite brief: and it is perhaps the very brevity of the statement that has led to so much confusion on its scope and intention. It is certainly a perverse fact that the very brevity of this Amendment has lent itself to literal volumes of interpretations and voluminous arguments to then oppose those interpretations for literally hundreds of years.

Read More
1673 Words | 7 Pages

The precise meaning and purpose of the Second Amendment has been a subject of frequent debate. Gun control advocates argue that when the newly founded country adopted the Second Amendment in 1791, each state maintained a militia composed of ordinary citizens who served as part-time soldiers’’ (‘’Gun Control’’). Even though states aren 't supposed to limit laws of the bill of rights in the past states had their own military groups so states should still have control over their own laws with guns like states did back then when the second amendment was

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

The topic of gun control and firearm regulation has been subject to heated debate for a long while. Both sides have potent arguments, however the core of this issue ultimately boils down to the constitution itself. More specifically the second amendment. This argument quickly becomes quite complicated because gun control and firearm regulation concerns not only the right of citizens, but more importantly the safety of citizens. The second amendment helps to guarantee an imperative right belonging to all citizens.

Read More
1293 Words | 6 Pages

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Throughout history, there have been numerous attempts to repeal the second amendment, or limit the purchase of firearms, and what such firearms are used for. The second amendment is a constitutional right that shall never be taken away from the United States Constitution. Gun control laws should be left just the way they are, because they ensure enough civil security, and enough security from people without the qualifications of firearm purchase to not possess such equipment.

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

Gun control also limits our constitutionally derived right to own firearms. If gun control is enforced, law-abiding citizens will be forced to give up their guns and their right to own guns, while many criminals who own guns may illegally keep theirs. As the saying goes “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.” Guns are an important aspect of our society in many ways. They allow for protection, recreation, and hunting.

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

It’s about to be the third month of 2018, and there have already been 35 mass shootings around the country. Just recently, in Parkland Florida Nikolas Cruz went into Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school with an AR-15 and opened fire. 17 people died in the shooting. Because of this people of different ages all over the country have been protesting against the lack of gun control by participating in walkouts, strikes, and memorials. Emma Gonzalez has been a powerful voice along with other students in the effort to create stricter gun control laws.

Read More
664 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, any law that contradicts the constitution should not be ratified by any state and if one is ratified, the law should be challenged by the Supreme Court. The Constitution states, in the second amendment, that “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Cornell University). The Second Amendment specifically gives all citizens the right to keep and bear arms. Those who favor gun control argue that the constitution states that a militia is necessary; a militia is defined as a civilian population to supplement the army in an emergency.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

Related Topics

Open Document