ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Nuclear War

669 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The importance of the atomic bomb in ww2

If in 10 seconds the “Tsar Bomba” the largest Nuclear USSR bomb, dropped on the city of Columbus, Ohio, the estimated number of injuries would be 821,940. Along with 955,920 fatalities. Nuclear weapons don't just injure people and destroy houses and building they kill. At the end of world war 2 the United States dropped “Little boy” which was a uranium based bomb that killed an estimated 80,000 people in the city of Hiroshima in Japan. With this said Nuclear war has been debated consistently throughout our country since its been first introduced into the world. With Nuclear weapons being such a scary powerful threat, they have also been debated throughout the world and how to stop these horrific weapons. With absolute no value nuclear war should be demolished throughout the world by conferences and gatherings with leaders of the countries who hold these nuclear weapons. …show more content…

This is significantly ironic considering the trump administration really wants the removal or stop the making of these nuclear weapons in Iran and North Korea. No matter how low-yield an atomic bomb may be in can still kill and injure many people. In the article Mary, the author, explains how these weapons would be used “to make Russia think twice about using similar weapons.” The article also claimed that russia had said they could easily “escalate or de-escalate” with the production of these weapons. This however will not stop the making of these weapons and may even increase the production because of countries worrying about their safety. If weapons like these do increase the world may soon be confronted with severe problems and even the possibilities of a world wide nuclear

Show More
Related
688 Words | 3 Pages

Overall the bomb is dangerous, but there are also many specific reasons on why dropping it was such a risky move. The atomic bomb is made from extremely toxic chemicals that will kill anything close to it.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

As said by Izhar Cohen, “the nuclear genie of how to make an an atomic bomb is out of the bottle, which means other nations or terrorists can obtain them and destabilize deterrence.” Izhar Cohen makes a point that the process of making an atomic bomb isn't a secret hence giving the U.S. another reason for them to keep their nuclear weapons. Because the process of making nuclear weapons is spreading, the U.S. needs to keep them for safety reasons. He also makes a point that terrorists could obtain them therefore making anyone without nuclear weapons an immediate target, giving the U.S. another reason to keep their nuclear

Read More
1345 Words | 6 Pages

If a nuclear war happened, the chemical fallout would not only harm people that were not affected by the bombing. Not only is the blast deadly also, the after math is just as bad “The five-year death total may have even exceeded 200,000 as cancer and other long term effects took hand” (Manhattan project). The fallout would get into the air and water and contaminate everything, then people would be eating and drinking the chemicals. Also with it getting in the water it will stick to ships and boats and be transported to other countries that did not get hit by the nuke or by it getting transported by wind. Not only do people have to worry about a war, but where they store these missiles at and what would happen if one was to go off.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

Before his election to the presidency, Dwight Eisenhower sought to contain the atom’s destructive power (). Yet, in his first speech at the United Nations as President of the United States, Eisenhower argued for the normalization of the international proliferation of nuclear technology (Office of the President, 1953). The motivation behind his now famous “Atoms for Peace” speech illuminates an interesting contradiction between the obvious American nonproliferation objectives and the president’s political calculation. The key to understanding this contradiction is to separate Eisenhower’s contemporary political motivations from the consequences of the president’s choice to pursue international proliferation of peaceful nuclear technology.

Read More
1211 Words | 5 Pages

Nuclear weaponry and its uses are more relevant in today’s world than ever before. Nuclear technologies that are capable of creating mass destruction to both nations’ lands and civilians have become a commonly owned resource in almost every nation’s arsenal. The main issue surrounding nuclear weapons and perhaps the reason why none of these technologies have been used is due to the inevitable outcome of global ruin. The one and only nuclear attack to date was performed by the USA military on Japan which killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in the cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima and caused mass destruction that took several decades to recover from. One of the largest global controversies is whether or not nuclear weaponry should

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

By 1945, those involved in the Second World War were exhausted. There had been millions of casualties, millions were still suffering and countries were in turmoil. After six years of war, those involved were ready for it to be over. By the end of 1944 the Axis had collapsed. Once Germany unconditionally surrendered on May 8, 1945, the Allies were hoping Japan would surrender too.

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

My argument is that I am for the decision of the atomic bomb drop on Japan. The atomic bomb save millions of American lives that stop them from doing D-Day-style on Japanese homeland and islands. These island invasion cost a lot of American casualties, and the Japanese soldiers are willing and very determine fight to the death. They see suicide as an honorable alternative to surrender. The whole population of Japan are willing to die to fight the Americans, if the U.S. didn’t dropped the bomb on Japan, then the war will dragged on and the Americans will lose a lot of casualties and Japan will lose almost all the population.

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

A “Nuclear Bomb” is a weapon of mass destruction that can lead to many disadvantages but at the same time many advantages. If you were to be a person that hosts a Nuclear Bomb and you possibly decide to release it, other countries will come against you and fire back, so basically, all the countries that have these weapons know that if they fire, others will fire too and that can be useful. Some even believe that the Second World War ended earlier than it should've when they used a Nuclear Bomb against Japan. "It is impossible to win a nuclear war, and both sides realized that maybe for the first time."

Read More
409 Words | 2 Pages

I was reading on The Week magazine 's website that on July 18th, 1945, President Truman was informed that the atomic bomb tests were successful. In other words, he now knew that America held the most deadly weapon in history, a weapon able to wipe out entire cities, or even nations. What a day. Imagine the possible accomplishments with such power; imagine what America could have become if we had used the atomic bomb to conquer the world.

Read More
408 Words | 2 Pages

North Korea’s been obsessed with securing a functional and deliverable nuclear weapon for what seems like decades. Lucky for them, it seems like it’s finally becoming a reality. Since Kim Jong II tested North Korea’s first nuclear weapon in 2006, the race for nuclear arms has quickly been taking shape—and it’s not in North America’s favor. While most of us have been distracted by Taylor Swift’s new album or the iPhone 8 leaks, North Korea’s super secret nuclear program has been making some pretty freaky waves. For now, here’s what we know (or don’t know):

Read More
404 Words | 2 Pages

If you have not heard of what is happening in North Korea you are living under a rock. For the last 50 years we have been trying to talk to North Korea peacefully, but they just don't want to, ever thought maybe because they actually want a war. This is a bad sight for America that they want to have nuclear warfare because it is high cost and maintenance. Building bombs is not the easiest and least expensive thing you know! They are also filled with plenty of risks one such as that they can accidentally lead to radiation disaster with a massive reach dangering your own country.

Read More
3678 Words | 15 Pages

“Nuclear power will help provide the electricity that our growing economy needs without increasing emissions. This is truly an environmentally responsible source of energy.” Michael Burgess Prior to the introduction of nuclear energy, fossil fuel was thought to be the only available source in producing energy. Although fossil fuel, such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas, contains high energy value, it produces too many harmful byproducts that ultimately pollute our environment. With the rising concerns over global warming as more and more greenhouse gases accumulate in our Earth’s atmosphere, many voice such opinions that new alternative, yet sustainable method must be adopted to produce energy.

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

Child labor is over all hands down immensely irresponsible. There is absolutely no reason why any underage child should be used for the manufacturing of products. Especially with help possibly from the U.S. not purchasing products from these despicable companies. As the U.S, knowingly we should no longer support the mistakes that continue to occur with the abusive businesses. Of course the U.S shall no longer allow this form of child abuse to continue.

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Nuclear terrorism has become a major topic of discussion because of the realism of this type of incident happening again and after all these years, the thought of a nuclear attacks looms in the forefront of everyday thinking. But the focus has been solely on terrorists conducting such an attack. With all the news about North Korea conducting nuclear weapons tests, Iran asking everyone who is listening for nuclear material, and Israel who has not officially admitted to owning nuclear weapons, should the object of attention be expanded to include non-state actors? Nuclear terrorism after all, is a reality and the ability for a terrorist organization or non-state actor to acquire nuclear weapons and use them to make a statement can happen. So

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

If nuclear weapons were ever used again it could wipe out all of humanity. The United States created the first nuclear weapon in 1945, and with those nuclear weapons they bombed two Japanese cities called Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nuclear Weapons should be banned, Countries should not have weapons that could wipe out the civilization. Nuclear weapons pose a direct threat to everyone. They cause distrust among nations and they are useless in addressing any of today 's real security threats.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Nuclear War

Related Topics

Open Document