People think putting a bigger ban on texting and driving is the best option. It is critical to grasp that distracted driving is an issue, but the law is not going to stop it entirely. “There’s no hard evidence so far to tie the dramatic increase in crashes or traffic fatalities to smartphone use” (Knuckle, 2016, p.2.). So viewers should not assume that it is the main cause. While it is true that crashes happen because of cell phone use, people should not tie that back to being the main cause for every crash happening. There is no statistic accurate enough to tie it back to uses of smart phones every time. In the same way, it has been proven that paying a fine will not change your view. According to Kunkle (2016), “Despite writing more than $1 million worth of tickets, drivers still can’t seem to put their phones down”(p.1). …show more content…
If that’s not an eye opener think of this; people know that death is an option when they pick up that cell phone. Dutton (2017) stated, “Passing such a bill means that law enforcement would have another tool in it’s arsenal to routinely stop individuals” (p.1). It’s just another way for the law to lock down and become more strict. Meanwhile, they forget to understand a person knows that danger is an option, yet they want to raise the price of a fine thinking that’s more alarming than losing a life. Having society notice that it is part of the solution, but not the entire solution is going to be the hardest topic to overcome. For this purpose, finding a more forceful way to deepen the minds and emphasize on the danger it can cause instead of enforcing a law that will just worsen people's view should be the main