More handpicked essays just for you.
Economic way for college athletes to be paid
Compensation for college athletes
Summary on college athletes getting paid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
Division I Athletes Should Be Paid In college there can be a wide of activities to enjoy. Social and academic clubs, fraternities and sororities however, there is one activity very popular in universities that not only gives students a sense of unity and pride as they cheer for their home team but generates millions of dollars in revenue for the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association): college sport teams. With the popularity of college sports and the vast amount of revenue colleges are generating from these sports an argument about whether these college athletes should be given a salary has begun to surface. Tracey M DiLascio, a graduate of Boston University school of Law and a former judicial clerk in the New Jersey Superior Court, states “The NCAA estimated revenue in 2014 was nearly $1 billion, 80 to 90 percent which came from the Men’s division 1 basketball tournament” (3).
You find one prime example of this when looking into the University of North Carolina academic scandal. The university was more concerned about making sure the athletes were eligible to play and would be able to represent the school. In an Article about the case,U.S Justice Department Official, Kenneth Wainstein stated the “office administrator Deborah Crowder typically handed out assignments then high grades after only a scan of the work” (Ganim and Sayers). In the report done by CNN written by Sara Ganim and Devon Sayers, they discuss the University of North Carolina offering “paper classes” and how “advisers funneled athletes into the program to keep them eligible.” (Ganim and Sayers)
College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
Should college athletes be paid? Annotated Bibliography Benedykiuck, Mike. “The Blue Line: College athletes should be paid.” Dailyfreepress.
Their schedule also includes a full-time college schedule that they must maintain if they want to stay in the school and continue playing college sports. If a student has 10 hours of class each week and puts in the recommended four hours of study for each hour of class, then athletes spend 50 hours each week studying and attending mandatory classes and study halls… .This means that college athletes have to work 90 hours per week just to remain in school on their scholarship. This is the equivalent to working two full-time jobs with a side job on the weekends just to pay their bills.” (Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Be Paid)
College players miss more class time playing at NCAA events, therefore they don't get enough class time. College athletes should be paid for all the things they give up. College players put themselves at risk each game they play. Everyone gots to realize that college sports are not P.E it's a job.
Introduction In the last couple decades there has been a stir that has arised in the presence of college sports: should college athletes be paid? There are many controversial topics and discussions that takes place when talking about whether or not college athletes should be paid? The answer to this question is very difficult and will be argued continuously for many years. It has been an idea ever since sports have existed in college. These topics have many different opinions based on people’s different backgrounds, beliefs, and economic status.
Many college athletes go uncompensated for the fame and profits brought to the college because of their victories, and half of the well known colleges wouldn’t be as well known as they are without their sports teams, yet they still aren’t paid for their efforts. College athletes deserve a pay because not all of them paid for their tuition, many of they got into the college that they are in now because of a scholarship. Some teams are treated like employees in a large company. “Because they are already essentially paid to play, they deserve the same rights and benefits as other employees, including medical benefits, workers' compensation when injured, and the right to use their God-given talents to build some financial security for their families while still in college.”
Pay College Athletes NOW The debate over whether college athletes should be paid has been an issue in the world of collegiate sports for decades. While college sports generate billions of dollars in revenue for universities and athletic associations, the athletes themselves often receive little to no benefits for their play on and off the field. This essay argues that college athletes should be paid for their dedication to collegiate sports. By examining the money the athletes make for colleges, NIL deals and why they're good, the hard work placed on student-athletes, and that these athletes barely have enough money to enjoy college, one of the primary reasons college athletes should be paid is the money that exists within collegiate sports.
Throughout the years, Division I college athletes have been putting incredible amounts of blood, sweat, tears, and time into their respective sports. These athletes, most of whom have played their sport since they were children, have dedicated huge amounts of their lives to build their talent that they showcase to the entire nation. Despite this hard work, most athletes still play for the love of the game, college sports have been transformed into an industry or business to promote or profit the schools that they play for. Players are somewhat compensated by receiving full rides to schools, however the NCAA makes significantly more than the average amount of money they provide the athletes for a full ride and many believe they should be paid more along with their scholarships. With a popularized understanding of the way NCAA sports function in recent years, the question arises: Should college athletes be paid for playing?
No matter one’s profession, people are extraordinarily hardworking in their respective industries and deservedly receive payment for it. This includes jobs ranging from janitors and waitresses to doctors and lawyers. The prevailing point is that no matter what a person does, they work and their employer compensates them. Recently, there has been great discussion about the possibility of paying college athletes. Many question if athletes who compete in a college sport should receive payment for all they accomplish.
There is so much time focused on their sports it’s hard for college athletes to be strong students as well. I would like to explore both sides of this argument, those who believe college athletes should be paid, as well as those who believe these athletes shouldn’t be paid. At the moment I am unsure of what side I will take, but I believe this is a highly debated topic with strong opinions for both sides. This question is problematic because it would change college athletics completely.
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
