ipl-logo

Essay On Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

1015 Words5 Pages

Throughout the years, Division I college athletes have been putting incredible amounts of blood, sweat, tears, and time into their respective sports. These athletes, most of whom have played their sport since they were children, have dedicated huge amounts of their lives to build their talent that they showcase to the entire nation. Despite this hard work, most athletes still play for the love of the game, college sports have been transformed into an industry or business to promote or profit the schools that they play for. Players are somewhat compensated by receiving full rides to schools, however the NCAA makes significantly more than the average amount of money they provide the athletes for a full ride and many believe they should be paid more along with their scholarships. With a popularized understanding of the way NCAA sports function in recent years, the question arises: Should college athletes be paid for playing? While big time NBA …show more content…

The money that is made doesn’t go at all to the athletes that brought in the funds in the first place, but to the coaches, staff and schools. For example, take March Madness for NCAA men’s basketball. Every year in March, 68 of the best basketball schools in the world play in a tournament to name just one team the NCAA Champions. This tournament annually earns over $ 1 billion through National Television and advertising and with a viewer rating of millions of people, which is continuing to grow each year (Jonnelle Marte, 2013). After the Super Bowl, March Madness is the largest in business when it comes to ad sales for a postseason sporting event. In 2012, the cost of a 30-second ad during the championship game cost $1.34 million, which is almost 3 times more than the cost during the NBA Championship (Jonnelle Marte, 2013). After all of this money is made, I don’t see why the players involved in the tournament do not receive at least some small form of

Show More
Related
1373 Words | 6 Pages

Present NCAA guidelines states that their athletes may not receive any form of currency for the use of their reputation or persona or they would relinquish their amateur status and their university entitlement could be affected (Wire 1). Their faces, their names, and everything that makes them the athlete they are is stripped from them when they sign endorsement deals. The endorsement deals spread their name and likeness, but they will not see any profit from the use of it. That is not the only time they will be used for promotions. All broadcasting income, ticket and sports attire sales, personal promotions, and other sources of profits goes to the NCAA, the schools, coaches, event personnel, and everyone else involved in the business—aside from the athletes making the money (Johnson 2).

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

The debate of the topic of paying student athletes, argues that these athletes currently receive scholarships, whose value in some instances, total close 200,000 over there four years. The NCAA have signed a 6,200,000,000 11-year deal giving CBS the rights to televise its men basketball championship that’s 545,000,000 a year up from 216,000,000 annually (Meshefejian 2). And college athletes don’t get any money from it. This is why college players should be

Read More
1527 Words | 7 Pages

Many people know or have heard about these college programs getting all of this money and that’s not what the viewers paid for they paid to watch the game and watch their favorite players play and not to see these programs get all of this money for no reason. This is an issue because the viewers are getting ripped off of their money and the revenue that the programs get goes to nothing good for the players only, the university. In the article “College Players Should Be Paid, the author Scott Polacek stated, “College athletes should be paid because some of the players struggle with finances and a player at ole miss university was struggling to get food for himself”(Polacek). The evidence shown proves that college programs get money for doing minimal work. This is unfair to the athletes because they work so hard and dedicate themselves to their sport and all the coaches do is teach them what to do and all the program does is collect the money that the athletes work for.

Read More
2007 Words | 9 Pages

According to USA Today College’s article on this issue, they stated, “First, who pays the athletes? The school, the conference, or the NCAA itself? Second, since most college athletics programs don’t generate money, who deserves to be paid? Each individual athlete, or just the ones who bring in the dough? What about the schools who don’t have big money-making programs?

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

¨ College sports like men's football and basketball generate billions of dollars every year for schools, coaches, television networks, apparel companies, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)¨ (McCormack). Athletes make these schools billions of dollars and get barely anything in return. Athletes do all the hard work. They make the colleges billions of dollars. They don't even get any of it, even though none of it would have been possible without them.

Read More
1295 Words | 6 Pages

Last year, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) made over one billion dollars in revenue. How much of that went to the athletes? None. The athletes (who by the way are the NCAA’s main source of income) get nothing. That's not the case for every athlete, though, as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) accused the University of Arizona of paying star basketball player Deandre Ayton one hundred thousand dollars to play basketball at their university.

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

Joe Nocera says “the N.C.A.A. itsself takes in $800 million a year mostly from its March Madness TV contracts” (Nocera). So if they are making $800 million a year they should be paying the athletes also. An Analysis of the economic impact of basketball found that “star Patrick Ewing to Georgetown University during the four years in the early 1980s shows that he brought more than 12,000,000 to the school” (Eitzen). So if some players are bringing in over $10 million dollars then they should get some. Stanley Eitzen says “the NCAA has signed a $6,200,000,000 11 year deal giving CBS the rights to televise its men's basketball championship” (Eitzen).

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

The coaches who are coaching these athletes make $100,000 per year four times what the athletes scholarships are worth. These coaches also receive bonuses for making it to the playoffs, winning championships, or breaking school records. The NCAA executives are making millions per year, and the students cannot even accept $50 for signing a autograph. The NCAA and the coaches are making a lot of money and becoming wealthier everyday off of the athletes that are playing for them .On the other hand some people say that college athletes should not get paid for their playing.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

NCAA data, however, indicated that only 20 of the 126 football bowl subdivisions universities earned an operating surplus on intercollegiate athletics in 2013 (Fulks 2014, p. 13) only a portion of those profits made it to the academic side of the schools. The problem isn’t whether college athletes should be paid, mostly all of the athletes receive grants or some type of aid that covers almost every college expense while at the institution. The NCAA policy compensates athletes for such thinks as room, broad, tuition, books and other fees. (“The Case for Paying College Athletes.”) its is likely that paying college athletes would shift the power from schools that made lower income with there sports teams, to more high-power schools such as Duke university or Alabama. This in fact would shift the dynamic of college institutions from the many that are out there with teams and probably make them equal to the number of professional teams (NBA 32 teams)

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Weekday games are now televised, bringing in more money.” (Wilbon, 2011).Why not give the athletes a little portion of the money they helped these big businesses earn? College athletes are basically a star, a young pro just not getting the compensation for it. Here is why? This source says that “Some people think that if the players can bargain over their working conditions, they will want to be paid, just as professional athletes are.

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

During March Madness, the NCAA brings in around $900 million with is 90% of its annual revenue. Some of the money is spread out to the different conferences to pay for some of their things having to do with the tournament. Then each time a team wins they get money, but all that money gets used up on team needs. They don't get enough money to give any out to players. So, if they can win lots of games and get money from doing it then they could pay them.

Read More
1469 Words | 6 Pages

One of the biggest debates in sports right now is if collegiate athletes should be paid to play. March Madness, a college basketball tournament that goes on for a month in March grosses around 900 million dollars which go to the NCAA and the colleges that participate in it. However, the college players don’t make any of that money. Rather the college athletes have to work hard all season and don’t make any money off of their play. College athletes should get paid though there are economical, educational, social and legal reasons why they wouldn’t be able to get paid.

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

Division 1 basketball players receive $38,246 in scholarship money, yet the average college student only obtains $15,900 in scholarships. What message would we be sending if we payed these athletes? In 2012, espn aired a documentary that followed the lives of a handful of professional athletes who went broke due to poor financial skills. This proves that these college athletes have no sense of economical management.

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

College sports are a massive revenue generator for all schools across the United States, so conferences and schools sign television deals worth billions of dollars. Prime examples such as the Big Ten’s contract with the Big Ten Network which pays out 2.64 billion dollars over six years and the Pac-12 conference’s deal with Fox sports equating to 3 billion dollars (Watkins). The research went to conclude that universities also receive money for post-season tournaments, such as the famed March Madness basketball tournament which generates 1 billion dollars annually off of their television contract. How come the athletes are not able to take even a small chunk of money home considering they are the ones playing in the games? Another big way schools make money off of athletes is through ticket sales.

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

The athletes don’t see a penny of it. The athletes are the reason for the schools, stores, TV, and others are making the money. Without student athletes they wouldn’t make any money from

Read More

More about Essay On Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Open Document