ipl-logo

Essay Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

962 Words4 Pages

“During the season, they can end up putting in 50 hours a week at their sports” (Nocera). College athletes are putting in numerous hours each week but at the end of the week they still do not get a paycheck. In the USA Today magazine Stanley Eitzen says that “The athletes (slaves) are exploited economically, making millions for their masters, but provided only with a subsistence wage of room, tuition and books” (Eitzen). So if college athletes are putting in this much work and making this much money for their schools than college athletes should be paid.
First athletes make the schools a large amount of money, but still do not get paid. As John Hoover says from the Department of Education's Equity in Athletics Disclosure “Texas in 2011-2012 revenue was $163 million, Ohio States was $142 million” (Hoover). Big time schools are making close to $200 million a year so there is no reason why they can not pay them. Stanley Eitzen says “an estimated $2,500,000,000 a …show more content…

Joe Nocera says “the N.C.A.A. itsself takes in $800 million a year mostly from its March Madness TV contracts” (Nocera). So if they are making $800 million a year they should be paying the athletes also. An Analysis of the economic impact of basketball found that “star Patrick Ewing to Georgetown University during the four years in the early 1980s shows that he brought more than 12,000,000 to the school” (Eitzen). So if some players are bringing in over $10 million dollars then they should get some. Stanley Eitzen says “the NCAA has signed a $6,200,000,000 11 year deal giving CBS the rights to televise its men's basketball championship” (Eitzen). The NCAA is making a huge amount of money and none goes to the people that are making it for them, the players deserve the money. So when people say scholarships are enough just know that the schools are making millions and they players are making

Show More
Related
1288 Words | 6 Pages

They claim that they cannot afford to pay college athletes when in fact that actually can. With the recent change in college football to make a four team playoff at the end of each season the NCAA will make a much larger amount of money. The NCAA doesn’t only make money off of football. They also bring in a large amount of their revenue from the men’s basketball. During the The NCAA sells the television rights to many different television networks for millions of dollars.

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

College athletes should be compensated because players put in hard work, NCAA makes money from the players and coaches get paid College players should be compensated because NCAA makes money from them. The NCAA is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization that just happens to be a billion-dollar industry, raking in $740 million per year from broadcasting rights for March Madness alone. According to U.S. News, the NCAA generates $11 billion in revenue annually, with 50 colleges exceeding $50 million in annual revenue. NCAA makes money as a non-profit organization. Allso, the players get a lot of attention for the school.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

Nathan Wise English II 1/2B Mrs. Barry March 10th, 2023 Why college athletes should get paid Eighty-Six percent of college athletes are below the poverty line and end up going into debt after school. Most college athletes will not have time to go to classes, practice for their sport, and spend time working at a job. This leads to them having to take out loans and going into debt. So if colleges added a way for athletes to get paid while practicing it would be very beneficial. College athletes deserve to be paid because they invest time and effort, risk injuries, and do most of the advertising for their sport.

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

If the NCAA can earn millions of dollars from student athletes, shouldn’t athletes retain their fair share? NCAA Student Athletes deserve to be paid because their hard work and time is the driving force behind the profit and popularity of the NCAA. All of the ticket and merchandise sales, television revenue, promotions, and other sources of income go to the NCAA, the schools, the coaches, the event staff, and others involved – except for the athletes creating the value of the NCAA. The NCAA finished the 2014 campaign with just under $1 Billion in revenue, which is more than the NHL and NBA.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

First of all NCAA takes in about 800 million and that's not including all the theam sponsors and side deals(Steinberg). Head Coaches through all of NCAA make a significant amount for there players who aren't getting paid. Coaches make an average of 1.64 million(USA today) and if there pay reduces it would make for easier pay. merchandise sold make millions for each team in the NCAA and this should generate enough money for players to get paid as 2,500,000,000 is made in merchandising alone(Slaves of Labor). The NCAA makes too much money too not give players

Read More
1453 Words | 6 Pages

Rodney D. Fort explains that: Many people have an aversion to paying college athletes for their services, but an examination of various principles of economics show that paying athletes makes sense and would make the college sports system more efficient in the way it distributes money. Players would receive more of the revenues they produce while pay would be cut for administrators and other employees in the athletic departments. (Fort 10) Many sports followers wonder where the money would come from if athletes would get paid. They think college athletic departments barely break even but their is some confusion. Fort stated, “Universities allow athletic departments to keep all excess revenues on an updated basis during any given budget period.

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

board it may not be enough to keep that athlete financially afloat. While these scholarships only cover tuition, room and board, these athletes have expenses that cannot be covered through their scholarship money such as transportation if the athletes do not stay on campus or travel expenses to return home during breaks to see their families. Also there are other personal expenses such as laundry, separate bills apart from the university, and any entertainment money. Division I athletes do not have the same amount of time to get jobs like other college students because they are putting in any time not devoted to classes and schoolwork on the field, so the athletes are left with no money to cover these expenses. The NCAA is making enough money

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

When people hear about if college athletes should get paid they would say no because they think the athletes would get paid millions of dollars. It is not like that, college athletes would not be paid that high they would only need to be paid so they can live a decent life. They have to balance their lives with school and their sports. College athletes should get paid because The NCCA is billion dollar business and the athletes don’t get any money, athletes spend more hours working for the sport than the average American, it helps athletes manage their money.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

They are being used to sell brands and a lot of them make schools more popular. The football revenue for The University of Texas in the year 2011-2012 was $103,813,684, and the players did not receive anything. According to the news article written by Richard Alm, a reporter for The Dallas Morning News, the NCAA’s D1-A , the 110 schools at the apex of college sports spent an average of $17.3 million at the end of the year 1997.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

NCAA data, however, indicated that only 20 of the 126 football bowl subdivisions universities earned an operating surplus on intercollegiate athletics in 2013 (Fulks 2014, p. 13) only a portion of those profits made it to the academic side of the schools. The problem isn’t whether college athletes should be paid, mostly all of the athletes receive grants or some type of aid that covers almost every college expense while at the institution. The NCAA policy compensates athletes for such thinks as room, broad, tuition, books and other fees. (“The Case for Paying College Athletes.”) its is likely that paying college athletes would shift the power from schools that made lower income with there sports teams, to more high-power schools such as Duke university or Alabama. This in fact would shift the dynamic of college institutions from the many that are out there with teams and probably make them equal to the number of professional teams (NBA 32 teams)

Read More
683 Words | 3 Pages

Since players are classified as students rather than athletes, they don’t receive the same legal protection as employees do. In 2014, NCAA proposed to expand permitted compensation to include guaranteed four-year scholarships. Mitchell, Horace, and Marc Edelman state “Instead of attracting athletes with money, schools lure them with big-name coaches and titles, so people believe it’s not exactly worth it. Some schools even might decide to drop football or basketball from their program. More would likely opt for a new level of talent that better fits their budget.”

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

”March Madness is one of the most watched sporting events in the country. Yet the money being made off this event is not trickling down to the players, who are the stars of the tournament.” this shows that in any sport this one being basketball, all the money they make it won’t be for them. The third reason why college athletes should be paid is because it gives them a glimpse at what it is like to have financial expenses and decisions

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.

Read More
1200 Words | 5 Pages

The NCAA made about 845 billion dollars in the year of 2011 from all the college athletes that went to the colleges, but not any of this money went to any of the college athletes. Now does this sound fair to you? There have been many arguments between people debating if their college athletes should be paid or not. People think that they should be paid because of all the hard work and effort that they put in games. In March Madness, the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) make an extreme amount of money, but colleges didn’t put in any work, the athletes did.

Read More
691 Words | 3 Pages

Over 90% of student athletes go to college to get a degree. Not to play professional sports. They know that the last college game they play may be the last time they play that sport competitively again. Keeping the rules of not allowing student athlete compensation the NCAA has now will make sure that students will finish their degree and be successful in the future, and reduce the amount of athletes getting in trouble and having hard trials later in their lives. Giving athletes full scholarships give some players the opportunity to go to college when they wouldn’t of gone otherwise.

Read More

More about Essay Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document