Coming across a resolution that states “That the United States federal government should legalize the creation of “designer babies” brings out the controversial side in anyone. Designer babies are babies that are genetically altered to have specific characteristics that the parent of the child wants. There are pros and cons to this situation, but I definitely think that the pros outweigh the cons. I can most definitely understand the opposing side, but there are more positives than negatives. Morals can get in the way, but the consideration of health, majority, and support are important for a topic like this. Designing babies is mostly about health. Health is very important when it comes to the birth of a newborn baby. Almost every mother wishes for their child to come out healthy with no issues or diseases. According to Ms. Schiller, mothers who are over 35 have a risk of having babies with Trisomy 21, or down syndrome. Down syndrome is a condition where the body has an extra chromosome 21 causing changes in appearance …show more content…
As previously stated in the second paragraph, more American adults agreed to designing babies. So, should the law be passed? A lot of people also seem to want to design babies for the characteristics and looks portion. According to statnews, 83% of American adults want baby designing legalized so they can choose their baby’s characteristics, such as intelligence, body size and facial appearances. People often complain about this saying that people who wants designer babies have bad morals and so on, but that’s an opinion. We should be figuring out what will help the healthcare of the future generations. Americans say that it will change society as also according to statnews.com, 57% of American adults say that bringing designer babies into the world either won’t change society or will affect it only a little. So, in the case of “majority rules,” designer babies should be