There are many pros and cons to allowing and encouraging people to take risks and fail while trying to be more innovative in the workplace. In order to discuss the pros associated with allowing employees to take risks and fail, we have to understand the three basic needs for the worker. They include autonomy, meaningfulness of work, and interpersonal contact (Kinicki & Williams, 2012). Including employees on decision making, even when it could result in failure can give the employees a better motivation, innovation, and performance because it gives them the three basic needs. This makes them better employees in the long run. It also gives the employees an avenue for growth. Many people learn a lot from failure and how to do things different next time. So giving them an opportunity to fail can truly create a learning experience for the employees, giving them a better sense of decision making for the future. Another pro is that it can teach people to think more analytically. Making these …show more content…
Some of the implementation principles of evidence-based decision making support the idea of recognizing failure to promote innovation. The very first implementation principle of treating your organization like an unfinished prototype is one of the ones that does support this idea. This principle is all about viewing new ideas and change as something that will not ruin the organization due to resistance (Kinicki & Williams, 2012). There are many examples and instances when organization will not make a needed change or entertain new ideas because they fear resistance from management or the people they employ. Instead of doing this, businesses should look into new ideas and promote change even if the results are a failure because it will promote thinking that could benefit the organization in the long