ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of International Whaling

857 Words4 Pages

1. Do you agree with the Norwegian and Japanese position on permitting the hunting of non-endangered species of whales as a cultural exemption?
Yes. I strongly agree with the position of the Norwegian and Japanese governments to permit the hunting of non-endangered species as a cultural exemption. Since the whales they seek to hunt are not endangered, its not an environmental reason to ban whaling of species. Furthermore, whaling has always been a part of their culture as the local fishermen hunts these whales, primarily as a food source for the people and a source of income for them. Norway and Japan posses the right to preserve their culture and to block any influence that globalization may have on their culture.
2. Do you think the whaling …show more content…

Since America is trying to impose this law on Norway and Japan, both parties should have a chance to present their reasons why or why not these countries should adhere to the International Whale ban. Members of the International Whaling Commission can also vote on the issue of whether or not whaling should be continued given the fact that whaling is a cultural right of these nations. The World Trade Organization may be asked to weigh in the validity of these claims, however, the decision should be unbiased. The WTO should research this issue and have an open mind to determine whether or not whaling is done for cultural means and if it should be continued. Also, if whaling be permitted in these countries, there should be certain limitations to prevent the endangerment of these species. Those who should be on these panels are those nations that have no conflicting interest in the act of whaling, those nations that don’t think whaling should be acceptable nor think that whaling is inhumane. With this impartial mindset, they will have a better chance of making a honest decision after hearing both sides of the issue.
4. How do you define a "cultural activity"?
Cultural activity can be defined as an event that suggest the way of life unique to a large group of people that has been passed on from generation to generation. This includes their belief system, dress code, diet, religion, language etc. Some behaviors

Show More
Related
372 Words | 2 Pages

The Killer Whales should be in small tanks, if an animal in captivity then is should have space to roam around and run. Parents should be able to take their kids to zoos and see healthy animals behaving

Read More
850 Words | 4 Pages

Marine parks in the country like SeaWorld, have orcas in tanks that they live in captivity. They use most of the killer whales for their performances in the pool. We all know that orcas are social, and intelligent creatures, that live in the oceans of the earth. We also know that many scientist are trying to study these animals in captivity where they are in tankes. I think Killer Whales should not be in captivity because, of the injures they can get in their tanks, how they get stressed out and they are better in the wild.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

This film about these extremely diverse mammals shows true footage of the whales and what they are capable of in captivity. It also talks about a lot of wrongs that are done to the whales in captivity by people who were there and done it or witnessed it themselves. The film gives out a lot of good information and statistics that have been proven by others as well. Because this source focuses on captivity and the poor treatment of whales, as will my paper, It will come to great use when the time comes to use

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

The grey whale population in 2001 was about 26,000, although this is the highest it’s ever been, is it a valid reason for them to be hunted? Animal activist groups think the hunting of grey whales is inhuman. Whereas the Makah, a tribe who hunt whales, believes it is part of their culture. This is the root of all conflict, multiple groups with opposing opinions. Some of the reasons this conflict arose is because of whale population, treaty rights, and most importantly the break the Makah took from whaling.

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

Killer whales should not be held in captivity. It is |apitation beautiful orca whales that should not be pold from the blue ocean which is in there home for the beautiful killer whales. When they get old from the ocean the get gold from where there natural habitat. When they get old they go to seaworld and the only why they get food is if they do tricks. They get feed fish but when they are rethest in the ocean the only why they get food is if they canter fish or other animals.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

I think killer whales should not be kept in captivity because when killer whales are kept in captivity they live an average of 13 years whereas in the wild they live around six times as long. Also, they have to spend ¾ of their life in a small metal box, and get fed an unnatural diet of thawed fish.

Read More
1560 Words | 7 Pages

The only whales that should be kept in captivity are injured whales; whales that would never make it on their own. There are some rare instances when they need humans to survive. “Springer was an immature and sickly killer whale who lost her pod in 2002 and began to associate with humans in Puget Sound near Vancouver” (“What to do about a killer whale”). Springer was “nursed back to health and returned to the wild quickly” (“What to do about a killer whale”). If a whale needs help, then humans should do everything they can to get them healthy again and nothing more.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

We can 't be certain that whale populations can survive large-scale hunting as well as the other daily threats they face. Ban or no ban, whaling remains inhumane and whales are unsuitable for use by humans in this way.” On The Nature Publishing Group they say that “ Major disadvantages of whaling include the potential extinction of some whale species, the unsafe levels of mercury that whale meat can contain and the potential harm to ecosystems that removing whales can cause. In addition, whale watching is a lucrative business in many parts of the world, and whaling could have an impact on that activity.

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

I define a cultural activity by a group of people, large or small, that have carried on a tradition for several generations. The tradition itself may have changed in some ways over the years, but the spirit or idea of the tradition remains unchanged. 5. Although the impact of the whaling ban effects only a very small percentage of each country's population, I did consider it in my decision. As the whaling operations of Norway and Japan are performed in a sustainable manner, I feel that it is an overreach of the IWC to impose these bans.

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

I believe that the Japanese and the Norwegians have a very valid point on the permitting of hunting of non-endangered species of whales. The global community has jumped on the whaling issue for various reasons. Some might include the fact some whales are becoming endangered as a result of the whaling industry, but I believe that a lot of the reason lies in the fact that the western world finds the concept of whaling disturbing simply because of the size and the human like qualities that we place on the animal. This argument then becomes a question of one culture versus the other. One culture sees whaling as barbaric and believe that it should stop the other culture sees whaling as normal since it has been a part of their culture for a long time.

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

Corvids are an incredibly intelligent family of birds that have exhibited strong cognitive capabilities and are shown to have strong social cognition as well. Corvids are members of the crow family, some of which include: crows, jays, magpies, and ravens (“Crows”, 2017). Through natural selection it is clear that it is important for the individual to obtain food in order to survive. So, it would only make sense for the individual corvid to discover a food source and to want to keep it all to itself. However, crows have actually exhibited the opposite.

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

If the acts of the Japanese and Norwegian people are part of their culture and not harming the well being of the people of the world they live in, then they should be permitted to continue the pursuit of retaining their heritage and cultural identity. It does not matter who sits on what panel, there should be some validity in the history of any such people. If whaling has been a significant aspect of their culture throughout history, anyone has the ability to research and identify the validity. I would define a cultural activity as an identifiable part of the society in question. Do they make tools and crafts for whaling?

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

An exemption for whaling The issue I choose to write about is the exemption for whaling. Due to International law brought forward by The U.N., countries are not allowed to kill whales for any reason, whether it be for food or cultural purposes. These laws have been put in place because some countries and or members of the U.N. want to protect whales weather they are endangered or not. Norway, Japan and a few other countries would like to continue the tradition of whaling which has been going on since prehistoric times. This of course has caused tension and conflict with the U.N. I support the stance of Norway and Japan when it comes to cultural exemption on non-endangered whales.

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

The Norwegian and Japanese positions and arguments to be permitted with the hunting of non-endangered species of whales as a cultural exemption should not be considered. According to the Whale and Dolphin Conservation, “the whaling industry is in decline and the demand for meat is falling” (WDC, n.d.). Given this statement, I would support the ban of whaling worldwide. In addition, it would be difficult and costly to monitor the whaling activity that is taking place in waters where whales frequent.

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

This should be allowed insofar as the killing of whales is essential for the continued survival or basic-well being of the group of people that hunt the whales. International organizations such as the WTO (Anonymous, 2015)

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of International Whaling

Related Topics

Open Document