Pros And Cons Of Lowering Drinking Age

If 18 year olds are old enough to vote or fight and die for their country, then they should be able to drink alcohol. [McCardell] believes that alcohol is a fixture in the lives of young people and suggests, instead of trying to outlaw it, America should consider policies the will “empower” eighteen-to-twenty-year olds to make mature decisions about it. In the early 1970s, most states raised the drinking age at 21 since that was the voting age at that time. From 1969 to 1976, some 30 states lowered their purchase ages, generally to 18. This happened because the voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 in 1971 with the 26th amendment that was passed with the congress of the united states to amid increasing support for a constitutional amendment.

The readers can also see a lot of proof and evidence that the drinking age should definitely be lowered for many good reason, especially when 18 year olds are capable to go to war and fight or die for the freedom of their country. Eighteen year olds can die for their country but not have the chance of drinking alcohol and enjoy some fun time, that is just not fair. The drinking age should be lowered. If the drinking age is lowered, there will be fewer binge drinkers at age 18 or 19 and will also reduce a lot of serious consequences of tragic incidents from binge drinking. It will prevent way more motor-vehicle crashes. It will perfectly help if colleges provides awareness for college students who choose to drink alcohol and will be a better environment for the college students to drink at safely, being supervised, and not being allowed to get on the car behind the wheel if some of the college students are drunk after drinking a couple of beers. If colleges provides the programs for students can drink, the colleges should also provides taxi cabs, ubers, lyft, or any transportations for the students that has been