ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Opposing The Death Penalty

698 Words3 Pages

I am not one to know much about the law and the justice system, but I do understand the prosecutor has to request the death penalty as a possible form of punishment before the trial begins. They make this request based on the crime itself. Was there intent, was it planned, and how was it executed. They need to convince the grand jury they have a good strong case and evidence to back it up. If the grand jury excepts the request, then capital punishment will be considered based on the evidence and the verdict of the trial jury. I do believe offenders deserve to be punished, or as how the book says, “paid back” for the crimes they commit. Not always on the terms that is has to be in the same severity of their offense, but if someone, with no doubt, committed first degree murder then I think the death penalty should be considered as the punishment. That is, the defendant performed the crime with premeditation, knew exactly what they wanted to do and did it cold blooded without a second thought. As long as the legal representation is adequate, the evidence of the trial proves without a doubt and the verdict in is guilty of first degree murder, I do believe the death penalty should be the punishment. …show more content…

I don’t doubt that innocent people have been brought to their death because of capital punishment, but I agree with the retentionists. It is not the intrinsic nature of the institution of capital punishment it stems from, it is from the deficiencies, limitations and imperfections of the criminal law procedures in which the punishment was meted

Show More
Related
698 Words | 3 Pages

At the point when managing Capital Punishment there are a wide range of strategies they use in the detainment facilities. Presently the act of the death penalty is as old as the administration itself. The death penalty is a legitimate infusion of capital punishment in which it is utilized for lawbreakers. As I would like to think, the demise of the criminal I think it rely on upon the individual whom did the wrongdoing and in addition the casualty family whom ought to have the capacity to see the crooks passing not the entire world. In the wake of perusing and doing research on the death penalty it has its genius and cons which will be clarify later.

Read More
1161 Words | 5 Pages

He suggests that other social policies also lead to the death of innocent individuals, but they are not banned. The author presents deductive arguments to support his position, including the idea that murderers who are not executed have the potential to harm more innocent people. He believes that opponents of capital punishment should acknowledge their responsibility for innocent lives lost due to murderers who were not executed. Prager concludes that capital punishment is necessary to protect innocent lives. Opponents should confront their responsibility for every innocent already murdered and yet to be murdered by murderers who should have been

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

According to Casey Carmical, capital punishment is a justifiable result to choosing to end another person’s life. In fact, Carmichael goes on to argue that should one decide not to execute on the grounds of murder, we the people would be committing a moral injustice to the deceased. Capital punishment can be seen as killing one human, in acknowledgement of their choice to end the life of another person; however murder, as defined by Carmichael is, “the unlawful and malicious or premeditated killing of one human being by another.” The death penalty is defined within its name alone, a penalty given by a court of law as the result of a malicious or heinous crime. The murderer is not sentenced to death without cause; they are reaping the punishments

Read More
1552 Words | 7 Pages

Imagine being in a cement room with nothing but a metal bed and a hole to defecate in for years on end. Imagine one day a person comes to get you and brings you to a room. In this room there is a chair with leather straps that you will eventually be forced into. There is a tube that leads into another room but you cannot see past the wall separating you. When you sit in the chair you are constrained like an animal and you must mentally prepare for what is about to happen.

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

Currently, the death sentence is only applied to those who commit murder, however, in the past, it has also been used for rape and armed robbery. Arguing in favor it can seem justifiable to take the life of a person who unjustifiably took the life of someone else. And with murder being the only way to be sentenced to the death penalty it seems fitting. Along with that, it provides deterrence from committing murder for possibly many people. The deterrence that execution provides is a debated topic nested into another controversial topic.

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

In recent years, anti-death penalty propagandists have succeeded in stoking the fear that capital punishment is being carelessly meted out. Ironically, Of the 875 prisoners executed in the United States in modern times, not one has been retroactively proved innocent. The benefits of a legal system in which judges and juries have the option of sentencing the cruelest or coldest murderers to death far outweigh the potential risk of executing an innocent person. First and foremost, the death penalty makes it possible for justice to be done to those who commit the worst of all crimes. The execution of a murderer sends a powerful moral message: that the innocent life he took was so precious, and the crime he committed so horrific, that he forfeits

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

Back in 1796 there were more than 10 innocent people killed and today about 4.1 percent of the people executed are innocent, and that’s more than enough. I think it is un fair to families, friends and the defendant to have their life taken if they are not guilty, If the law officials cannot prove whether or not the defendant is guilty then the death penalty should be abolished. Now on the other side, executing someone who is actually guilty; I do not support this either. I strongly believe that someone who commits a capital crime and has received the death penalty deserves to suffer for the rest of their life. Democratic leaders will be the ones to change the death penalty.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

This subject matter often divides people due to its controversial nature. On one side, there are people who bring up the notion that it is inhumane and that no one should be subjected to deprivation of life. On the other side, there are people who believe some criminals deserve to face the worst possible consequences for their actions. While the opposition party makes valid points, I will nevertheless stand by the side in favor of capital punishment.

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

These mistakes are not repairable as death is final and several cases have been re-examined where DNA that exonerates someone was not involved in court proceedings due to the time-period resulting in the execution of an innocent. They respond with the notion that the death penalty detracts from the sympathy of people for the pain and suffering of the families of the victims of crime and shifts the sympathy to the offender instead. Some human rights groups speak against the execution of an individual on death row gaining that individual a following in the media for sympathy with their impending death for the heinous acts they committed. They say that it is insulting to the victims’ families and makes a mockery of the heinous acts that were committed. Finally, abolitionists contend that capital punishment does not bring the victim back to life.

Read More
1636 Words | 7 Pages

Since ancient times the legal thought regarded the concept of death penalty as a measure necessary to protect fundamental values of the society. Along with the development of a state, state judicial system and regulations were developed as well, creating a two-fold purpose of the criminal law: punishment of a criminal and intimidation of population in order to prevent further possible crime commitment. These two initial positions are still present in the criminal law today and constitute the eternal debate around the topic of “for and against death penalty”. In this essay, I would like to briefly describe the two current positions along with the arguments and afterwards express my own opinion in that matter.

Read More
346 Words | 2 Pages

The Death penalty can be justified when viewed from an egalitarian point of view. This view in relating to the death penalty holds that equal crime deserves equal punishment (MacKinnon & Fiala 2015). Therefore, if one causes death with intent to kill then that person should also be put to death with intent to kill. Many states would agree with this view.

Read More
340 Words | 2 Pages

Capital Punishment is the punishment by death received for breaking the law. Capital punishment is also known to be called Death penalty. The death penalty will always be around. It is a way that the government keeps people in line, well at least that 's what the government thinks. Capital punishment isn 't something someone thinks about when committing a crime punishable by death when they do it.

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

There have been many controversies on the topic of capital punishment and its role within society. It is not likely that there will ever be a unified view on this topic. One of the first reasons why the death penalty should never be imposed is because of the possibility of killing an innocent person. True enough the DNA technology has decreased this probability but due to administrative bias innocent people can still be killed. There is no retribution for a dead man who was wrongly put to death.

Read More
1687 Words | 7 Pages

Dr. Martin Luther King is considered to be one of the most influential civil rights leader in the United States of American during the 1900’s. Dr. King had begun his career as an ordained minister who worked primarily in the south promoting segregation to increase the numbers of African America registered voters in the southern communities, but had later on spend the remainder of his life working towards the civil rights movement for not only for the African American community but for human rights and dignity virtually everywhere. His fight was not directed towards any particular individual or groups, instead he had dreamed to put an end to unjust laws which denied civil rights to all citizens, especially the African community. According to

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

Ageism is widespread across all age groups according to an independent study by Kite and Johnson (1988, p.54). In fact, negative attitudes emerge very early in life as young as three years old. For some people over the years more permanent negative attitudes become fairly well entrenched. At its most basic level attitude can be reflective of an emotional or cognitive response to a person or group, whereas, stereotypes are traits or specific characteristic expectations for certain groups (Harwood, 2007, p.53).

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Opposing The Death Penalty

Related Topics

Open Document