Pros And Cons Of Random Drug Testing

While there are no broad federal laws on random drug tests in private jobs, there are some federal laws that require drug and alcohol testing in some industries. Random drug testing can become a big issue to lots of people. Wither it’s because of privacy rights or to make sure that you can work better with coworkers. Although in some people’s eyes, the pros over rule the cons and the vice versa, everyone one is equal to and have the same privacy rights. This can become a problem to some and cause them to exercise their rights in the court of law. Random drug testing can be an effective and not so effective at the same time.

There are different pros and cons to random drug testing. “The Drug-Free Workplace Act applies to all federal contractors

A few of those are privacy concerns, cost of testing, issues arising under individual state laws, etc. Many areas have random drug testing policies in place. Randomly testing employees uninvolved under suspicion of drug use is unconstitutional because the Fourth Amendment states that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause... People who test negative for an illegal substances do not prove random drug testing is a successful deterrent, it can only prove that they have not consumed illegal drugs recently. If someone is hiring for a new employee that has a drug conviction on their record, it would be reasonable perhaps, but privacy is a right. Aside from the protections offered by our Constitution, it 's a costs a lot of money. As said in ACLU, the average cost of a drug test $42 per person tested, and that’s not including the costs of hiring personnel to administer the tests, ensuring confidentiality of results and to run confirmatory tests to guard against false positives resulting from passive drug exposure, cross-identification with legal, prescription drugs such as codeine and legal

In some states, companies cannot conduct drug tests of all of their employees or random drug tests. If there were to be a drug test then the testing must be focused on an individual, either because the employer has a good reason to believe that person is using drugs or because the person 's job carries a high risk of injury or damage if performed by someone who is using them. Courts have generally ruled in some cases that companies may test employees after an accident that could have been caused by drug use or an incident in which the employee appeared to be impaired. For example, a tractor operator who swerved the machine illogically through a field crowded with workers could be the legal target of drug