ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

470 Words2 Pages

The fact that the death penalty has been around for so long allows millions of people to be involved one way or another. The ones affected by it the most are the innocent; a total of 69 people have been released from death row in the past 35 years after evidence of their innocence (Innocence and the…). The reason for this is because the criminal justice systems block the potential use of DNA evidence; they refuse to consider it even when it could confirm someone’s innocent or quilt (Hooper). For example, in Francisco Juan Larranga’s case, he was convicted of kidnap, rape, and murder of his sister, he was sitting on death row. There was no specific evidence to prove that it was him and his lawyer mentioned that the DNA test would have proven him innocent because they only based it off of one body that they found; courts were not sure if it was even the sisters body. …show more content…

The court systems are so unsure about one's innocence that when they are on the point of getting executed they need to have one line connected to the Government and one to the court inside the execution room. They do this for just in case either one calls to lengthen out their trial and stop the execution before it is done. When this fails to happen and the suspects continues with the execution, the way the executions is done can affect them hugely. Many suspects have been affected by botched executions and experience long painful death. One example is on August 10, 1982.

Show More
Related
726 Words | 3 Pages

The moral of the death penalty is that when someone commits a heinous crime, they should be prosecuted in a way that is equal to their crime. Robert Blecker, JD said that "We have the responsibility to punish those who deserve it, but only to the degree they deserve it...." This states that people should get what they deserve. If they go out and commit homicide or murder for fun they should get the same treatment. Losing someone can be tragic, but losing someone because a criminal killed them is even worse.

Read More
285 Words | 2 Pages

The death penalty is currently legal in 31 states in the United States. The fact that capital punishment is not morally required in any case is true. One could argue jail is not moral either and we would have a larger number of criminals who do not fear any type of punishment. Why should mercy be shown to those who commit senseless acts that take another’s life, on of the most sacred things?

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

According to the natural law, everyone's lives matter. Despite what crime an individual has committed it is still morally wrong to kill. Innocent people have been executed because of this form of punishment. Levy states, the innocence rate for death row inmates is 4.1%. Similarly, since 1973, there have been 144 people on death row that have been exonerated (Levy 2016).

Read More
425 Words | 2 Pages

The most important philosopher of the Enlightenment is Francois Marie Arouet, who was known by the name of Voltaire. Voltaire lived from 1694 to 1778. He was in many ways a representative philosopher during his century. He wrote over 70 volumes of books and over 21,000 letters based on his thoughts and beliefs. He was known to attack beliefs that he didn’t quite agree with.

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

Should the death penalty/ capital punishment be a thing? The death penalty should not be legal, because it has no place in today 's society. The death penalty has been around since at least the eighteenth century B.C. Now the U.S. still has the death penalty in 31 out of the 50 states. While some may say it seems barbaric to still have a death penalty, the U.S. says it 's used as a crime deterrent.

Read More
1296 Words | 6 Pages

Death Penalty, Constitutional or Not Imagine a family member of yours was unjustly framed with something he didn’t commit and he is sentenced to death penalty, how would you feel? Death sentence has been thrown back and forth with the argument that it is or it is not an acceptable way of punishing. Offenders are doing what they know best, breaking the law, but the government instead of fixing the problem by doing something better, the make it worse by taking another life from society, which can be considered a “crime”. The death penalty is currently being used by thirty-four out of the fifty in the United States. Death penalty often establishes the question, “Does the government have the right to take away someone’s life?”

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

In relation to the previous paragraph, convicted killers have been released from prison and taken the lives of even more people. In addition, according to statistics, this does not come as a surprise. Approximately 95% of inmates will be released back into society at during their live, 67% of former prisoners are released in a year, and 52% of former prisoners are re-incarcerated in a year (Recidivism High). These statistics show if a murderer is released back into society, there’s a high probability of them commits new crimes or even murder once more. Furthermore, supporters of the death penalty believe it’s morally wrongful to let a person live that has taken the life of another.

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

I think that occasionally we can have a discussion of a more serious nature. My thoughts on the death penalty which unfortunately mostly no longer exists in many states is that what you do to another person should be done right back to you and the end of that. Happy dancing with the devil but who am I to say there may be other who are of another opinion. Let’s take a look at how the death penalty came about and how it also ended. Many years ago a man named Giuseppe Zangara shot the Mayor of Chicago Anton Cermak.

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine you are walking in the park with your child. It’s a lovely afternoon in April. The sun is shining, birds are chirping, and life is great. As you continue your walk, you notice a man approaching briskly. His arms are locked, indicating he’s carrying something.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

The article which title reads “Will more states abolish capital punishment?” is based most of it on facts. When an essay is based on facts, I believe gives a great amount of credibility considering the arguments that exist in the article. In addition, it shares valuable information about the criminal justice system in the United States. This video is based on a true story; it is about a lawyer that needs to defend a young-adult boy since he has committed a murder.

Read More
415 Words | 2 Pages

How would you feel if one of your family members was put to death for a crime he or she commited? The death penalty is wrong, no matter the crime no one deserves to die. The death penalty is the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime, the death is given to the excused from the state, an inmate can stay on death row for an average of 15 years before they are put to death;There are 5 ways someone can be put to death Lethal Injection, Electrocution, Lethal Gas, Firing Squad, and Hanging, The death penalty is legal in 31 states and is against the law in 19. The death penalty is given to human by another human so there will be mistakes out of 25 people who are put to death 1 of them will be innocent.

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

I was once the youngest person in the U.S. on death row. And I was innocent but my punishment is death. As a teenager on death row, I often had nightmares of my own execution. Even though I was innocent, death seemed very close to me, and my mind would light up with images of being strapped to a gurney, the sound of poison coming from a machine and being pushed through my veins. Four years after being sentenced to death and being on death row, I heard that the murder charge against me was being dropped.

Read More
615 Words | 3 Pages

As stated in the website, Death Penalty Information Center, “The death penalty in the United States is used almost exclusively for the crime of murder. Although, over the course of time, there were a significant amount of murders, rapes etc. Which caused the offenders to receive the death penalty. Therefore, The amount of crimes that can be committed by one are endless, but the kinds of crimes that can be committed to sentence one to receive the death penalty are limited, as well as the various execution styles.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

¨The death penalty issue is obviously a divisive one. But whether one is for or against, you can not deny the basic illogic - if we know the system is flawed, if we know there are innocent people on Death Row... ¨Richard LaGravenese. The death penalty is a example of a cruel and unusual punishment and life in prison is a much better option.

Read More
1613 Words | 7 Pages

By executing the defendant it helps ensure that murderers will never kill again. The families of those who have lost their life usually want the accuser to pay for the act of violence that occurred allowing them never to be able to hurt anyone again. By taking the individual off of the street, it provides a sense of safety for the victim’s family and the community. Additionally, technology has advanced DNA testing, and it is now often used as evidence for criminal convictions. Before DNA testing, criminal cases were conducted based on circumstantial evidence that may or may not be committed by the individual.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

Related Topics

Open Document