Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons about death penalty
Pros and cons about death penalty
Pros and cons about death penalty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons about death penalty
Pros and cons about death penalty
Pros and cons about death penalty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In California, the death penalty costs an estimated $499.7 million per year, while life without parole is $11.5 million per year (Report of the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice). This extreme cost of the death penalty comes from paying for systems that filter the crimes eligible for capital punishment, systems that run the death penalty, and systems that give the defendants a fair trial (Report of the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice). In Los Angeles, each execution costs an estimated $250 million; however, life imprisonment in Los Angeles has a significantly smaller price tag (Rone). Statistically speaking, if the death penalty were removed, it would save a substantial amount of money for California. This outrageous price tag is exactly why capital punishment should be removed from the legal
The moral of the death penalty is that when someone commits a heinous crime, they should be prosecuted in a way that is equal to their crime. Robert Blecker, JD said that "We have the responsibility to punish those who deserve it, but only to the degree they deserve it...." This states that people should get what they deserve. If they go out and commit homicide or murder for fun they should get the same treatment. Losing someone can be tragic, but losing someone because a criminal killed them is even worse.
The death penalty is currently legal in 31 states in the United States. The fact that capital punishment is not morally required in any case is true. One could argue jail is not moral either and we would have a larger number of criminals who do not fear any type of punishment. Why should mercy be shown to those who commit senseless acts that take another’s life, on of the most sacred things?
There is no significant effect on crime rates. Overall, as the use of the death penalty has declined, the murder rate has continued to fall. In California, the murder rate as of 2013 is at a 4.6 rate which is down from 5.0 (“UCR,” 2013). California continues to waste millions of dollars on death penalty trials. Our tax dollars continue to pay for prisoners’ housing and
Using the taxpayer’s money to keep a prisoner in a special system is not good for anyone. The death penalty is not good at deterring criminals, unlike having life in prison. California should change their death penalty system to cut the billions of dollars going to keep prisoners on death row. Works Cited “End the death penalty in California.”
As of April 1, 2015, there are 3,002 inmates currently on death row. Greg Wilhoit spent five years of his life on death row for a crime he was wrongly convicted for. On June 1, 1985, Greg’s wife Kathy was viciously murdered in Oklahoma. About a year later Greg was arrested and charged with Kathy’s murder because two dental “experts”, one whom had been out dental school less than a year, testified that a bite mark found on Kathy’s body matched Greg’s teeth. While on trial Greg was assigned a new attorney which helped him to get a new trial, during the new trial forensic odonatologists examined the bite mark and testified that it could not be mark’s and was let out on bail.
“JFA [Justice for All] estimates that life in prison cases will cost $1.2 million-$3.6 million more than equivalent death penalty cases.” (Pros and Cons - Death penalty) Even though the cite states that death penalty cases are generally more expensive in the beginning than life in prison cases, people argue that given time, with life in prison, the cost of keeping someone alive in prison for the rest up their life will add up and would soon cost more money than if the prisoner was sentenced to death. Since part of what pays to keep prisoners alive in jail is taxpayer money, many people use this to justify the death penalty, because people don’t want their hard earned cash being used to keep someone who has killed multiple people in prison for life when it would cost less in a long run to quickly execute the inmate. People also use the simple phrase of, “an eye for an eye” to justify the legality of the death penalty, where if a person commits a murder then he should be executed for depriving a family of a loved one.
Death penalty is a type punishment sentence that is giving to a person who commits a serious crime, and is put to death. If somebody knew that their actions would lead to death, it could possibly make them rethink their crime. Writer Evelle, Younger wrote the article Capital Punishment: The people's mandate, which talks about people's point of views on capital punishment: “The death penalty will save lives, so I’d like to have it restored as soon as possible.” There will always be a few mistakes in a court ruling, and sometimes the innocent inmates do not get lucky, but taking chances to save other people in this country is a chance a lot of judges are willing to take. Today America has high power technology that prevents innocent people going to the death row let alone jail.
Death Penalty Many prisoners are put in on death row each year. Death Row has been around for along time to punish prisoners for the bad crimes that they have committed in the past. Reasons why I don’t support the Death Penalty would be it costs a lot in the state of California the state pays one point twenty six million dollars and that’s a lot of money wasted and if you follow in Christ he made a commandment it says “You Shall Not Kill” because it wrong to execute another. It costs a lot of money to provide for prisoners. The government wastes one point twenty six million order the lethal injection for all the prisoners on death row, but the bad thing is that it costs ninety thousand more each year.
In relation to the previous paragraph, convicted killers have been released from prison and taken the lives of even more people. In addition, according to statistics, this does not come as a surprise. Approximately 95% of inmates will be released back into society at during their live, 67% of former prisoners are released in a year, and 52% of former prisoners are re-incarcerated in a year (Recidivism High). These statistics show if a murderer is released back into society, there’s a high probability of them commits new crimes or even murder once more. Furthermore, supporters of the death penalty believe it’s morally wrongful to let a person live that has taken the life of another.
There are numerous things in this society which ought to be banned however the death penalty is not one of them. It is most likely the right approach to go the extent that capital order is concerned. At this moment in our nation, I think that it crazy that criminals believe that they can escape with pretty much anything. My argument for this essay is that death penalty is a resource for society; it discourages potential criminals and also serves retaliation to criminals, and is not the slightest bit indecent. The death penalty can be a greatly valuable device in sentencing criminals that have perpetrated a portion of the most exceedingly terrible crimes known to society.
The fact that the death penalty has been around for so long allows millions of people to be involved one way or another. The ones affected by it the most are the innocent; a total of 69 people have been released from death row in the past 35 years after evidence of their innocence (Innocence and the…). The reason for this is because the criminal justice systems block the potential use of DNA evidence; they refuse to consider it even when it could confirm someone’s innocent or quilt (Hooper). For example, in Francisco Juan Larranga’s case, he was convicted of kidnap, rape, and murder of his sister, he was sitting on death row. There was no specific evidence to prove that it was him and his lawyer mentioned that the DNA test would have proven him innocent because they only based it off of one body that they found; courts were not sure if it was even the sisters body.
The death penalty is the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. On April 1st, 2008 the Death penalty was authorized by 37 states. Only 13 states chose against the death penalty. In Indiana there are 14 convicted murders on death row, and 19 convicted murders have been executed in Indiana since 1977 (County, 1998). I feel that the amount of money used for the death penalty could be used for better things.
What do you classify as cruel? Abusing animals, abusing people, or maybe murdering someone in cold blood? Would you classify the death penalty as cruel? Not all states have the death penalty, for instance Michigan doesn’t have the death penalty, but Texas does. The death penalty is a state law, so every state's opinion on the death penalty is different.
Donald J. Trump once said, "The death penalty. It should be brought back and it should be brought back strong... They say it's not a deterrent. Well, you know what, maybe it's not a deterrent, but these two [men convicted of killing two police officers in Hattiesburg, MS] will not do any more killing. That's for sure."