ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of The Football Bowl Subdivision

1633 Words7 Pages

Since its debut in 1998, the Football Bowl Subdivision has used the Bowl Championship Series to determine its champion. The goal was to get rid of the idea of having two champions. This system has been the subject of some controversy. The controversy is over whether the Football Bowl Subdivision should get rid of the way the current format that favors the playoff. Considering the fact that they are one of the few leagues, whether it is college or pro, that does not have an end-of-year tournament to determine their champion. The Football Bowl Subdivision needs a playoff because allows all teams on college football’s highest level to compete for a championship, and find out who really is the best of the best. The system that is in occurrence …show more content…

Basically this is saying that if a certain team in a certain conference has a very good record, it is because of the strength of their schedule, and who they play. A prime example is Boise State. They are in the Mountain West Conference, who doesn’t have the strongest teams or strongest scheduled games. When Boise State was given the chance to play top-tier teams, they surprised many people and did very well. Between 1999 and 2010, Boise State has won a hundred thirty-four games and lost only twenty-one. They averaged eleven wins per season. This period included ten conference titles, two undefeated seasons, and five one-loss seasons. This included victories over sixth-ranked Virginia Tech and nineteenth-ranked Utah in 2010, third-ranked Texas Christian University in 2009, twelfth-ranked Oregon in 2008, tenth-ranked Oklahoma in 2006, and eighth-ranked Fresno State in 2001. Despite all of their success, they have only appeared in two BCS games, which they won, and have never finished higher than third in the rankings (“Bronco Football: A …show more content…

Usually, the BCS rewards teams that go undefeated. When other teams see this happening, coaches will then try and schedule weaker opponents so they can get easy wins, so that the BCS will reward them. Having this playoff system removes the easy schedule and makes the championship strictly about performance.
Challengers of a playoff say those on both sides of the argument are ignoring the issue of travel and attendance arrangements. They claim that if teams would not know their next opponent, should they advance? Additionally, there would not be adequate time for fans to arrange to go to the team’s next location. This is a key reason why things should be kept the way that they are.
The reason there is no playoff in the Football Bowl Subdivision is because of money. There is the belief that college football is a business, and not an amateur sport. This statement can be followed up with the fact that football players are being played to play football. I personally know people who are on Division 1 teams that are get paid monthly for being on a full scholarship at their school. Their tuition and everything else is paid for, the school is literally paying them to play football for their university. They want the athletes to bring in as much revenue as possible. At the end of the day, that’s the more money the university is

Show More
Related
171 Words | 1 Pages

In this article Steve Greenberg wrote about how Crismon Tide shouldn’t be in the playoffs and thought that Buckeyes should be in the playoffs. The main components of the essay to get into the SEC mind about not allowing the Buckeyes in the playoffs instead of the Crismon Tide. The way

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

Should College Football Replace the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) with a Playoff System? Many football fans including me argue that a playoff system should replace the BCS. They contend that it is the only fair way to determine a national champion and that the BCS method is subjective, profit-motivated, and sometimes leaves the best teams out of the championship game. They should change this because it doesnt make sence to have college football teams go against each other in a national championship while eight other top teams play in four bowl games.they should have playoff games like in the NFl instead of having a lot of Bowl games. This was formed in 1998 I strongly disagree with the playoff system they use in college its just not fair to others because It 's not fair because the sec, acc, big 12, PAC 12, and big 10 automatically have the playoff spots with one champion being left out.

Read More
618 Words | 3 Pages

The NCAA should expand their football playoff system because it prepares the student-athletes

Read More
426 Words | 2 Pages

Because NCAA membership is so highly sought after, member schools usually grant broad power to

Read More
420 Words | 2 Pages

The first reason I think the playoffs should expand is the fact that the season would have more games. I know some people oppose this thought, but this would mean the top 4 teams would get a bye to start the playoffs. The wild-card matchups would then be 5 vs 8 and 6 vs 7. If

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.

Read More
161 Words | 1 Pages

This is like the traditional single elimination tournament style playoffs with the top four teams facing off to play in the national championship game. Since its inception the CFP has also been

Read More
166 Words | 1 Pages

You don't ever want to lose that. You don't want to lose the fact that every regular-season game is important. And only having 12 teams qualify, which is the smallest of any of the professional leagues by far, that's a good thing for us.” “(It) likely will happen at some point, but we want to be really cautious because we really like the balance we have with the importance of the regular season and

Read More
299 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever wondered why college football has bowl games instead of a playoff system? Well I have and college football needs to stay with bowl games. That is what college football is known for. College football should stay with bowl games because bowl games make every game crucial to win, there are more attendees at the bowl games, and because the BCS favors consistency over the course of the entire season. The BCS system is the best way to find the best teams.

Read More
440 Words | 2 Pages

In the National Collegiate Athletic Association wrestling is one of the top five viewed championships in college sports, but how are we supposed to know who we like best when we only get to see them in the playoffs? I believe that there should be more college wrestling on TV. There should be more wrestling on TV because it’s unfair. There’s NCAA football and basketball on television all the time, so why shouldn’t there be wrestling too? Eighty-three percent of the people I interviewed agreed with me on this subject.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

After graduating from High School one may choose to further his or her education through college. People do this for many reasons. Some people do it for professional benefits, while others do it for sports athletics. This paper will be focusing on those who do go to college for athletic benefits. Specifically, this is focusing on how these college athletes do not get paid and why they should be paid.

Read More
1880 Words | 8 Pages

Still however “Players aren't supposed to get any compensation tied for performance, and recruits cannot sign any NIL deal contingent on going to any particular school. As usual, some schools and players got ahead of the process and cashed in early, while others didn't and got left behind” (College Football HQ). However “Booster involvement in recruiting has always been against the rules, and the NCAA is stepping up its enforcement of that rule to include any potential NIL violations that may involve boosters using collectives to lure recruits to their schools with the promise of big NIL deals” (College Football HQ). Another way expansion will positively affect CFB is with Super conferences. For as “At the rate things are going, three 20-team conferences will emerge and break away from the NCAA by 2030 while taking a European country's economy worth of money with them” (Sports Illustrated).

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Already, the system of college athletics is corrupt. People see that all this money is being made and the college athletes are completely getting

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

The first reason is because People would stop watching or attending the college games. Second the kids are already getting a free college education, place to stay, meals, and there book fees paid for. Finally this would cost to much money for the NCAA to pay for all the players in the NCAA. The first

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Football Bowl Subdivision

Related Topics

Open Document