Pros And Cons Of The Laws Over Congress

After experiencing that the Articles of Confederation granted too little power to the federal government, the Founders decided to replace it with the Constitution. The U.S. Constitution was created to protect citizen’s rights and provide more power to central government. However, the Founders did not want the government to hold too much power, they created three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial branch so that one branch could limit the power of the others. This is also called checks and balances. Each branch carries different tasks but still works together towards the same common goals to ensure that the U.S. is developed and thrived. The principal function of the legislative branch, which is also known as the Congress, is making

However, presidents might depend on Congress to support their foreign policy actions.
The president has more advantages while executing laws over Congress because he has a chance to negotiate with Congress, measure legislative effectiveness, and veto bills. Since Congress contains 535 members, it takes Congress members a lot of time to negotiate and commit a final decision while the president can decide and act within a brief time. With the knowledge of congressional operations and skill of persuasion, the president can discuss, cajole, and bargain with Congress members to compromise and get as much as he can. The president can negotiate with Congress by having different favors and penalties to enhance his persuasive and put pressure on legislators who refuse to heed the requests. However, it is not easy to persuade the Congress, and George Bush is an example. Because of his lack of skills and interests in legislative processes, the congressional office rejected his domestic legislative agenda, and he lost Congress support on the Iraq War. When he had a meeting with lawmakers about full funding for rebuilding Iraq, he simply

According to the Constitution, Congress is the only one who has “a power of purse”, but after World War I, the federal government recognizes that it is better to let the president involve in the budget process. Therefore, the Congress passes the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921 to entrust important priority setting and responsibilities to the presidents who are so inclined the opportunity to dominate budgetary politics. The act also creates the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review funding requests from government departments and assist the president in devising the budget. The OMB office, which contains hundreds of finance experts who only work for the president, assists the president to deal with Congress on budget issues. Even though the president has to submit the finance request to Congress to revise and make a decision, the president has more advantages than the Congress because of his huge information sources, finance experts in his office, and his persuasive skills. The example of how the president is dominant in budget policy-making is president Obama quietly sent $221 million to the Palestinian Authority that Congress members had been blocking in January 2017. However, two GOP lawmakers had placed holds on the Palestinian funds which emphasized that Congress has a right to