Welfare is helpful to a certain extent, but why do some use it as a crutch for longer than appropriate and who is to blame for this? In what ways is the current welfare system not living up to its
That is not what welfare should be used for though, it should be used as an extra last resort support system for an individual until they can get back on their feet. This is why there are so many people on the street and in homeless shelters, because the government is giving them free money. This is why it should in the end be up to private organizations and charity. This is because if it is a small group of people working with the less fortunate they can get to know them individually and try to help them off of welfare or the support that they are getting. Granted there are some things that the less fortunate should have the opportunity to have and that is health care.
Recommendations: Since, Welfare-to-Work was designed on a state level, each state have their way of allocating the funds and it can be different from state to state. Therefore, we identified some issues in Wisconsin, Maryland, and general. Problem 1: Not having any work requirements for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) recipients to receive benefits. Politicians believe the federal program would set up recipients for long-term use with no incentive of getting them off the program
While some insist the Welfare programs help families in need. They imply without such programs a person would not be able to support themselves nor their children. Both sides have a valid argument and both sides
The idea of welfare reformation has been tossed around for years now. The ideas of fairness, equality, and taxes have been politically argued in terms of welfare abuse. An immense amount of people tend to favor the reform because they feel the program is weak in major, prominent areas that ultimately join together to create success within the nation. The program itself, especially its organization and requirements, must be altered to better suit the non wealthy population. With such a weak formation of a nationwide service, it is no surprise there are issues in areas like abuse to the system and fraud, the formation of poverty, creating dependency, increasing drug abuse, and over taxation.
Some of the positives of the welfare system are primarily straight forward such as helping the poor buy necessities for day to day living, provides food, medical care, help people get their lives on track to where they can provide for their families. Welfare is intended to be a temporary assistance not long-term. After reviewing some of these positives it’s easy to tell that the intent of these programs were good hearted and with the desire to help pull our citizens up and on their
One flaw is that welfare is mandated by the federal government. “The current welfare system is a complicated set of federal programs involving the Department of Health and Human Services, Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, Labor, Treasury, and Education” (Faherty 17). Although this may seem like a good thing from the outside, it isn’t as favorable as it appears. Each community is unique, and therefore has its own individual set of people and needs. There are 50 states in America, 3.797 million square miles, 19,354 cities, and 318.9 million people.
The concept of a welfare is for the government to protects citizens and provide help socially and economically. Instead, according to the Georgia Public Policy Foundation, welfare “creates a trap that is difficult to escape.” Indeed it does. Majority of the times, welfare comes with a lot of strings attached. It provides a source of income, but it controls one’s life too aggressively.
The debate topic today posed the question of whether or not the social welfare programs in effect today adequately meet the needs of Canadians. The con-side argued that there are too many issues within these programs to adequately meet every citizen’s needs. The first issue is the marginalization of these program’s requirements in order to obtain them making them inaccessible to many. Although this may be true, it discards the fact that in order to be efficient and include as many “needy” people as possible, there must be requirements/criteria that people meet to use these programs. In addition, the requirements necessary to use these programs are dependent on the majority of the people who need them.
The welfare system has existed in the United States as a result of economic hardships that have befallen American citizens as a result of wars, economic depressions, physicalities imposing one on working: whether that'd be old age or being under the age of eighteen, or simply not being able to make ends meet. Many working-class Americans believe that people who receive these benefits are inherently becoming accustomed to being taken care of by the government and in turn surviving on the backs of working-class citizens, but this is untrue. There are various forms of welfare specifically designated in states. In Texas, there is a different number of agencies and programs designed to help people: Texcare Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP),
Welfare recipients around America are not doing anything to get off of welfare. Research shows that they spend more money on things they do not necessarily need, rather than carefully spending their money on the necessities. Welfare is for people who need the extra help to get themselves and their families by. Many people on welfare are wasting their money on drugs and alcohol. Welfare recipients should be required to pass a drug test in order to receive the benefits of welfare.
The United States Government has allowed the welfare system to become abused over the years. It is intended for families in need of housing, food, child care, education, and healthcare. How do we define needy families? Are they able-bodied or truly in need of the assistance from the government? Today the problem still lies with the taxpayers having to foot the bill for people that are able to work, but are spoiled by the government and refuse to seek employment.
During the Great Depression of the 1930s, local and state governments as well as private charities were overwhelmed by needy families seeking food, clothing, and shelter. In 1935, welfare for poor children and other dependent persons became a federal government responsibility, which it remained for 60 years (Constitutional Rights Foundation). Over the years the federal government has begun to spend approximately $668 billion per year on 126 different welfare programs, according to a U.S. Census Bureau report. Over 50 million people are using hard working people’s tax dollars for their own needs. There should not be millions of dollars wasted away on welfare abusers.
It’s understandable that people will get fired or let go sometimes but they shouldn’t just be handed money until they die. I think that welfare should only be a temporary fix, like it was intended to be, not a life-long thing. Unemployed citizens should only be able to receive welfare check for a short period of time, long enough for them to be able to find a job. Welfare was meant to be a good system to help others during a hard time, but it was not meant to fund the unplowed until death, and it was not meant to put the working class in debt either. There are many small fixes to this problem, but not enough people who see that this systems rules and regulations need to be
Millions of Americans receive government aid such as welfare every year. Of those Americans who are on welfare, many are unemployed. Some people may need welfare because they don’t make enough money to support their families. However, the amount of money spent on welfare every year is tremendous. Welfare should be taken away from those who don’t work.
