ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Triple E Senate

388 Words2 Pages

There are many different opinions about the Senate. Some poeple want to abolish, reform, or keep it as is. The Senate costs us $60 million. However, if the Senate is reformed and the members are elected, it will cost $120 million every year. The Senate acts as the "sober second thought". Their main role is to provide a final check on the legislation passed in the House of Commons. Some people believe this isn't necissary and that we should not spend so much money on it. Additionally, some people feel that we are alreadt overgoverened in this country. We have municipal governments, urban hamlets, towns and villages, rural municipalities, countries, school boards, hospital boards, provincial governments, the federal House of Commons, and the Senate. Some people think that …show more content…

To ensure that all Canadians are truly equal, the "Triple E" Senate was created. It stands for effective, equal and elected. Since the Senate is not elected it represents the worst of partisian, political patronage, it lacks all legitimacy. Also, if they are elected they would be accountable to the regions they represent. Overall, some people believe the Senate will never be a legitimate part of the lawmaking body, unless it's members are accountable to the people of Canada through a democratic election process. I believe that reforming the Senate is the best way to go. The "Triple E" Senate plan aims to develop an elected, equal and effective Senate. We will be able to provide a more balanced regional representation by electing senators. Additionally, if the Senate is abolished, there will be no final revision or discussion of any legislation. We will be relying on the House of Commons to make all of the final decisions. Overall, different people have different opinions on the Senate. Some want to abolish, reform or keep it as is. However, I believe it should be reformed to make it more equal for everyone across

Show More
Related
510 Words | 3 Pages

This argument remains valid in modern debates as the absence of an upper house continues to severely restrict the possibilities by which legislation can be evaluated and amended (Costar 2015). Although it has been determined that the upper house alone is not the cure for attaining an answerable government, it is said that by re-introducing a second chamber in Queensland, a number of valuable functions can be performed. Functions such as the review of legislative proposals at a ministerial and departmental level as well as the control and limit of political power and the ability to protect human rights can be carried out in a way that is not possible alone by a lower house nominated by the government (Aroney 2008, 28). Not only does the upper house act as an extra technique to review and amend changes to legislature, it also has had a profound effect on the ability of the Queensland Parliament to correctly carry out its functions under the Constitution which compel it to act responsibly and review the undertakings of the executive arm of

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

Unit Four - State Hearing Question 2 The filibuster is essential to good governance in the United States. By nature, this arrangement works to protect minority rights, encourage compromise, and prevent impromptu legislation. Although indispensable, the filibuster must be reevaluated and modified to prevent impotence in the Senate.

Read More
1295 Words | 6 Pages

In Maryland as well as at the federal level, the Senate would serve as a form of aristocratic check on the executive as well as on the democracy. Carroll helped create a system of checks and balance that would still work hundreds of years

Read More
1949 Words | 8 Pages

Above all, the senators nominated by senate are the venerable politicians, nobles, and the people possessing good prestige and social status. So Senate is a good completion and supplement to the House of Commons from both the political background and diversity, which can reach a balance and stability for legislation system. With the social progress and continues development of legislation system, the rhetoric and proud of appointment and dismissal, the power of supervision and voting are replaced by the “Only relatives are employed”, ”political return” system. The shortcoming of system and its devoid of keeping pace to time finally hamper the development of itself, however. Under this circumstances, “Duffy” is the essential victim under the increasingly corrupt

Read More
547 Words | 3 Pages

Modern congress and its members seem largely concerned and focused on partisan advancements. Though there are many reasons as to why the enormous division in congress is as it is, there is one factor that draws the most attention. Filibuster an action that is used by most congressmen and women to delay the passage of laws, has increasingly over the course of time become a negative action rather than positive. The use of mostly long speeches as ways to prohibit and hinder bills or laws is now being used by many senators to advance personal and party goals thus, it is crucial that the ban of filibuster must be considered and replaced with the simple majority rule. First and foremost, some reasons as to why filibuster should be exempted from

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Looking at the political history of Canada, there has been quite a few times when provinces were unhappy with the divisions of powers between themselves and the federal government. In 1985 Alberta’s Select Special Committee proposed the idea of a Triple E Senate reform. They viewed parliament, especially Senate, as a way that they could bring their issues to the national forum and they could be taken care of. The provinces have been more interested in a more regionally represented parliament that would be more interested in aiding in regional issues. They believe that Senate should follow through with one of its major duties and instead of simply focusing on Ontario and Quebec due to their larger populations, should instead have representatives from each province to strengthen the federal government in its relations with its provinces and the total Canadian

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

Besides, the Senate should be more democratic which can change the way that the senators are chosen: let citizens choose the Senate by themselves directly instead of to let the federal government to choose. During this election, the voters need to choose the representatives from a list of candidates; the candidates who have the largest number of votes would win. Last but not the least; a reformed Senate should have greater equality that they should provide a more balanced regional representation to protect the area where has the less populations. Thus, it should have lots of members who are from different provinces to vote directly. Under this system, each province would have a certain number of Senate seats.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

The legislature could hold all the power and re-elect the same senator and he could hold power for as long as he wanted. The people have to have a say in their government in order to create their happiness. They didn 't

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

I believe the important thing in parliament is to be subject to the Constitution and Rule of Law. This is to ensure that every one of Australia is treated the same way, equally and fairly. The Constitution provides the basic ruled of government and the Rule of Law ensures that everyone is subject to the law. I believe that the current system couldn’t be improved, this is due to that the current system is fair and deals with issues in parliament

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

However, abolishing the Senate may not be the best for Canada in the end, so another argument is to reform the Senate. The best plan at the moment to reform the Senate is the Triple E plan, as it would make it so that the Senators are elected, each province is represented equally, making the Senate more effective. If we were to abolish the Senate the only way to do so would be by a constitutional amendment backed by at least seven provinces representing 50 per cent of the population, or one with unanimous provincial

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

One becoming a senate must be: over 30 years old, been a US citizen for 9 years, and length of the term is 6 years. There is no limit on how many terms one can serve in either or. From looking at the qualifications, it is fascinating that Representatives have more relaxed qualifications compared to the Senate. These qualifications and the total number of members allowed could be a way to promote sociological representation, representation of group through similar race, gender, ethnicity, and religion as the group.

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

All over Canada, Canadians have different views as for what should we do about the Senate .Yes, the Senate has some important qualities but what we do not need the Senate for today is one of its original purposes, to represent the interests of the provinces in the federal legislative policy process. For example, people like “Ralph Goodale, who fought hard for Saskatchewan’s interest around the Cabinet table for more than a dozen years. John Baird, the regional minister for Eastern Ontario today,”(Eugene Lang) is a current equivalent. The provincial interest is taken care of by regional ministers in a way that no senator or group of senators could hope to

Read More
1581 Words | 7 Pages

Prorogation is much like a complex acronym to Canadians. We understand that it conveys meaning in some way, yet the majority of us are not familiar with the term. Developed during the Tudor period, prorogation is a healthy alternative to dissolution; however, today prorogation is a process that once approved by the Governor General, the acting Prime Minister may cease the current parliamentary session, effectively clearing the parliamentary agenda and ending proceedings for a set period of time. In recent years there has been a growing controversy in relation to prorogation in Canada. This is largely due to the 2008-2009 parliamentary disputes between the Conservative minority government and the opposition governments; however, that is addressed

Read More
1312 Words | 6 Pages

"Candidate with the highest number of the vote wins the right to represent the particular seat in the House of Commons", according to CBC news. There are some limitations regarding this method. First of all, it could possibly happen that candidate with less than half vote wins, which means it only reaches minority people's desired outcome. In addition to the tactical voting, the two-party system could be a serious problem. Since only the first matters, candidates with the low possibility to win may exist the election.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Secondly, the parliamentary executives, the cabinet minister and the Prime Minister, share responsibilities. Therefore, the parliament is “jointly responsible for the actions of the government…primus inter pares (first among equals)”. (Haywood, 2007, p. 95) Lastly, a typical feature of the parliamentary system is that the offices of the Head of State and the Head of the Government remain separate from each other. Union is a key feature of the parliamentary governments worldwide.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Triple E Senate

Related Topics

Open Document