After reading through the information given to me, the benefits and hindrance of using UCR, NIBRS, and NCVS are... The pros of participating in NIBRS (National Incident-Based Reporting System ) is that the NIBRS can provide almost any kind of information of nearly all the major cases such as terrorism, abuse, assault, and etc. The information they produce is detailed, accurate and meaningful than others. Also, they help agencies to work together to find a solution or strategies to the case.
There are many different ways to determine and measure crime. UCR, NIBRS, and NCVS are just three types to differentiate, and each system has multiple ways of labeling crimes. UCR stands for Uniform Crime Report, and can be located on the governments website to compare how low or high crimes were in specific years. Uniform crime reports can be the most effective when determining part I (aggravated assault, robbery) vs part II (simple assault) crimes. Usually it is easier for precincts to send their reports to the state, being that they have more technology with determining who someone is based on fingerprints or ballistics.
One of these being the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Survey, which is filled out by most police departments and divisions. Yet, this survey only records information about the crime, and nothing about race. Another police record is the Uniform Crime Reporting Incident-based Survey (UCR-2). Similar to the UCR, this survey also records information on the crime and the parties involved in committing the offence. In addition, the UCR-2 records social characteristics of victims, age and gender, relationship between the offender and victim, and date of birth.
Contrast the UCR/NIBRS with the NCVS The Uniform Crime Report (UCR) has been administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) since 1930 and has grown tremendously over the years. The UCR now includes data from city, county, state, and federal law enforcement agencies from across the United States. In its infancy, the UCR constructed a Crime Index that “summed the occurrences of seven major offenses, including murder, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft—and expressed the results as a crime rate based on population” (Schmalleger, 2009) with arson being added to the list during 1979. However, due to skewed data the Crime Index was officially take out of use in the UCR/NIBRS program during 2004.
For this reason, Spelman seeks to test the remaining methods in order to determine the most appropriate specification for the crime equation. The crime rate data Spelman uses is the data set originally constructed by Marvell and Moody in 1994 (Spelman, 2008, p. 153). The data set is quantitative in nature and consists of violent crimes which include homicide, forcible rape,
The UCR may indeed be based on crimes reported by the police but those reports are lower than the actual number of crimes committed due to the dark figure of crime and the dark figure of recording, making the UCR subjective to the officer’s interpretation of crimes. However, the General Social Survey is based off the public’s perception of their own victimization
I think that the most significant weakness is that the NIBRS is one of the more detailed databases in the fact that it tracks for useful information like offenders with multiple offenses or multiple victims, however it is highly under reported. NIBRS was designed to improve the weakness that occur within the UCR, nevertheless if nobody is reporting to the database it cannot improve. According to Terry (2013), “Currently, police departments representing only 17 percent of the population submit data to NIBRS” (pg. 11). That is a huge weakness that only 17% report to NIBRS.
The Unified Crime Report (UCR) is the basic police crime reporting system that has been around it seems like forever. Local police departments report all the crime that has been reported inside their jurisdiction on a yearly basis to the state police who in turns gives it to the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) so that they can compile a each year to state police who in turn report that to the FBI. It is by far the most widely used report for the current statistics on reported crime in the United States. “Some critics take issue with the way the FBI records data and counts crimes. According to the “Hierarchy Rule”, in a multiple-offense incident, only the most serious crimes are counted.”
Although it is merely impossible to gather information directly from every single person in the US, it is possible to draw conclusions about our entire population using the data from the National Crime Victimization Survey, or NCVS. Unlike the Uniform Crime Report, or UCR, which relies on the reports made by police officers, the NCVS is a victimization survey that collects data from 43,000 households at random. While the UCR has its own advantages, many people seem to prefer the NCVS, since the randomization allows for data to be collected from a broad range of population groups, which allows for estimates to be made for the entire population. Moreover, because the respondents are people and not police officers, there is no possibility for
The 'Standard' is a 'Standard'. Overall, this book reminds crime analysts to be mindful of data because data is social in nature, and everything is not “just
“Data Collection: National Judicial Reporting Program (NJRP) 1986-2006.” United States Department of Justice. . Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2012. “Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems.”
After searching through the websites provided I decided that for this assignment I am going to use the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting website. The FBI Uniform Crime Reporting website provides a lot of information and insight on many different topics. The purpose stated on the homepage of this site is it can be used as a “starting place for law enforcement executives, students of criminal justice, researchers, members of the media, and the public at large seeking information on crime in the nation” (Uniform Crime Reporting). This website gives a lot of statistics on a wide variety of topics. Topics included in the website are; crime in the United States, law enforcement officers killed and assaulted, hate crimes, cargo theft, and human trafficking.
The purpose of this study is to address the relationship of gender, religion, party identification, and ideology on the attitudes of legality of all forms of abortion, amongst United States Citizens. Abortion is one of the most polarizing issues in American politics, support for, and against, is perceived as generally split down party lines. This concept of party identification as a litmus test, for attitudes on abortion, appears simple on the surface, but becomes more nuanced as consideration of previous research examines the effects of these independent variables; gender, religion, party identification, and ideology on the dependent variable, attitudes on the legality of abortion. Abortion is an issue that most Americans have an opinion about,
Introduction Looking at the nightly news, many would believe violent crimes are at an all-time high. There are not just one on one violent crimes or gang violent crimes. There is court shootings, school shootings, church shootings, theater shootings, mall shootings, workplace shootings, and others. Where most one on one crime is committed with illegal guns, mass shootings are done with handguns purchased legally.
UCR Aside from theories pertaining to victimology, crime reporting has been essential to developing theories in regards to providing a form of evidence that supports the theorist’s theory. Gathering statistical evidence from police departments is not the only way to formulate a theory for those theorists who chose to utilize that information in their theory. The Uniform Crime Report assembles official reliable data that has been manifested by the FBI. Law enforcement students, researches, the media, and anyone from the public has utilized their information at their own convenience. However, just like every other statistical data, not everything is accurate.
