More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature Review Crime Reporting System
Uniform crime report strengths and weaknesses
Description of the uniform crime report
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are many different ways to determine and measure crime. UCR, NIBRS, and NCVS are just three types to differentiate, and each system has multiple ways of labeling crimes. UCR stands for Uniform Crime Report, and can be located on the governments website to compare how low or high crimes were in specific years. Uniform crime reports can be the most effective when determining part I (aggravated assault, robbery) vs part II (simple assault) crimes. Usually it is easier for precincts to send their reports to the state, being that they have more technology with determining who someone is based on fingerprints or ballistics.
The better of the two systems by far is National Incident-Based Reporting System or NIBRS, and basically, it offers much more detail, and for the state (MD) means collecting more quantifiable data. Under NIBRS, each offense incident is reported instead of using summaries as with Uniform Crime Reporting standards. NIBRS includes many more individual elements about events not covered with UCR. Besides, more crimes are reported in NIBRS and cover 49 'Group A ' offenses (Crime Against Person, Crime Against Property, or Crime Against Society).
One of these being the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Survey, which is filled out by most police departments and divisions. Yet, this survey only records information about the crime, and nothing about race. Another police record is the Uniform Crime Reporting Incident-based Survey (UCR-2). Similar to the UCR, this survey also records information on the crime and the parties involved in committing the offence. In addition, the UCR-2 records social characteristics of victims, age and gender, relationship between the offender and victim, and date of birth.
Contrast the UCR/NIBRS with the NCVS The Uniform Crime Report (UCR) has been administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) since 1930 and has grown tremendously over the years. The UCR now includes data from city, county, state, and federal law enforcement agencies from across the United States. In its infancy, the UCR constructed a Crime Index that “summed the occurrences of seven major offenses, including murder, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft—and expressed the results as a crime rate based on population” (Schmalleger, 2009) with arson being added to the list during 1979. However, due to skewed data the Crime Index was officially take out of use in the UCR/NIBRS program during 2004.
This viewpoint displays unbiased measures, it demonstrates what society believes is criminal as well as values, and it has since become more detailed and informative due to an increase in agencies providing data (Morden & Palys, 2015). Using this perspective, the UCR seems to be unbiased but because it only has data that is recorded by the police, it is not all that fair. Police officers do not record all reports that are reported and if it is not recorded, then it is not reflected in the UCR. This is an issue in the UCR, and in some part, Statistics Canada for not having the most accurate data being collected and presented to the public. As a result, there are many crimes that also go unreported and is also not reflected in the UCR or in statistics.
It also states that they were wanted for the crime of auto-theft. Since it is from the perspective of the FBI, it is very reliable .This is because the criminal system has elements such as fairness, where it should be free of bias and injustices. As a result, it is a reliable source of information as it is free from bias. Therefore due to the great depression, crime became a social tension that increased during
The 'Standard' is a 'Standard'. Overall, this book reminds crime analysts to be mindful of data because data is social in nature, and everything is not “just
Does the Felony Murder Rule Deter? Evidence from FBI Crime Data. New York Times (Working Paper). Retrieved February 21, 2018, from http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/malani.pdf. Robinson, Paul H., & Williams, Tyler S. (2017).
Yet contradictory to profiled beliefs, minorities do not make up the main perpetrators of secondary crimes. Statistics point out that, “the likelihood a stop of an African American...yield[ing] a weapon [is] half that of [a] white New Yorker”. One in every 49 stops of Caucasians revealed a weapon, while it took one in every 71 stops of Hispanics and one in every 93 stops of African Americans to achieve such a feat. In addition
The UCR or the Uniform Crime Report there is of course some positive and negative aspects of this method of reporting crime. Starting off with the positives it obviously helps determine the highs and lows of crime around the world and it’s something that we should know is an estimate its not exact data that’s recorded but it does give us a good estimate of the crime that goes around this country. The UCR is the longest running source of data for collecting crime so that obviously shows how good of a method it is as well. Now for the negatives, again its not exact statistics that’s reported just because not all crime is reported in this method. The UCR was administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 1929.
Contrary to the common belief, crime has been on the decline for the past three decades. Yet, news and media have been covering crime more than ever, resulting in the public belief that crime is at an all time high. The sharp drop in crime since the early 1990s has left experts curious to discover the reasons for the decrease in crime. As I compare the article Understanding Why Crime Fell in the 1990s: Four Factors that Explain the Decline and Six that Do Not by Steven D. Levitt and the article Evaluating Contemporary Crime Drop(s) in America, New York City, and Many Other Places by Eric P. Baumer and Kevin T. Wolff, I will briefly describe the articles, compare their agreements and disagreements, as well as discuss my personal preferences.
p. ::? ::; ::?::). The exaggeration and over-representation of crime news in the press has been prevalent since the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries (Caldwell,
After searching through the websites provided I decided that for this assignment I am going to use the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting website. The FBI Uniform Crime Reporting website provides a lot of information and insight on many different topics. The purpose stated on the homepage of this site is it can be used as a “starting place for law enforcement executives, students of criminal justice, researchers, members of the media, and the public at large seeking information on crime in the nation” (Uniform Crime Reporting). This website gives a lot of statistics on a wide variety of topics. Topics included in the website are; crime in the United States, law enforcement officers killed and assaulted, hate crimes, cargo theft, and human trafficking.
Uniform Crime Report is a program developed by the FBI to gather all retrieved data from la enforcement offices all over the country of the United States. The FBI doesn’t not analyze the crime report, they just compile it because law enforcement agencies voluntarily provide the data to the FBI which then they release it to the public. The great thing about UCR is that it lets society/ individual statistically compare crimes from previous year to now, see what particular crime is happening the most. The bad part of the UCR is that is not always accurate, the information gathered can be made up by a victim of a crime or the agency did not erase the report before submitting it. The UCR has both Pros and Cons which can be useful but mislead.
Police got a call of a possible fight breaking out on the platform of the Fruitvale Station by a crowded train coming from San Francisco. As police started to arrive to the scene two officers had already reprimanded him with his arms behind his back. He was motionless and then one of the officers by the name of Johannes Mehserle who was a 26-year-old white male pulled his pistol from his waist and shot Grant in the lung, which lead to his death later that night (Kirk, Papachristos, Desmond: 864, Additional Cases). The researchers chose this case and the case of Sean Bell because they wanted to see if non-local shootings affected the crime reporting in Milwaukee as well. What was interesting is that in the case of Sean Bell the amount of calls went down like the other three cases.
