ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism

1033 Words5 Pages

Michael K Williams
Professor Gibberman
Into to Philosophy
5 Oct 2017

Philosophy Paper 1 - Prompt 1 Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism can be described as an ethical philosophy to which its purpose is to maximize the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people, while also attempting to limit the amount of pain or suffering, this is known as the Utility Principal, seeing pleasure and freedom from pain as the only intrinsic goods. Secondly, this ethical theory focuses on the consequences, or results, of the actions in question, while viewing the individual’s intentions as immaterial. “Actions are right as they tend to produce happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill) This is referred to as the …show more content…

This critique has its roots in the first systematic account of Utilitarianism, as it was proposed by Jeremy Bentham. Bentham’s Utilitarianism was based on the use of his self derived ethical equations. These equations could then be used for calculating the degree of pleasure or pain a specific action is likely to cause. This was a logical approach from Bentham to create a scientific equation for calculating morality, to be used thereby to determine the actions likely to produce the most utility. Critics of this method see these equations as cold logic and reason stepping into ethics, potentially being used to justify the ends of hedonism or pure sensory pleasure, not unlike the swine. Likened to Epicureanism, Mill utilizes this critique not only in an attempt to refute claims of swinishness, but to also differentiate his interpretation from, or further clarification of, Bentham’s Utilitarianism. While Bentham went only so far as to differentiate between pleasure and pain, Mill further clarified the manner of pleasure by breaking it into two separate categories. He also begins to refer to pleasure as happiness, in an attempt to elevate the ideal concept away from the base physical to the sublime …show more content…

He has accomplished this by simultaneously clarifying levels of accessible pleasure, differentiating in the quality and quantity of those pleasures, and by further clarifying the terminology of pleasure, not as only sensual pleasure, but as a feeling of happiness. With these points, Mill elevates the standards of those in his time who would be guided with Utilitarianism as their ethical

Show More
Related
408 Words | 2 Pages

Indeed, what Mill achieved was extraordinary, however he had a nervous breakdown at nineteen. I agree with the author’s arguments about happiness. The definition of this emotion is very subjective and it can vary from one person to another. Happiness depends on an

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

John Stuart Mill, one of the most influential philosopher of the nineteenth century, created a principle that states “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness”. This is known as the Greatest Happiness Principle which focuses on what a man ought to do to promote happiness and prevention of unhappiness. When it comes to consequences in utilitarianism, this is what categorizes an action under “right” or “wrong”. Mill’s definition of happiness is based on the amount of pain and pleasure present in the consequence of the action. Happiness is the intended pleasure and absence of pain whereas unhappiness is pain and the deprivation of

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, is one of the most influential philosophers in the history of Western Philosophy. Based on the principles of Kantianism, certain types of actions are allowed, even in cases where the action would bring more happiness than the alternative. On the other hand, philosopher Jeremy Bentham, the founder of Utilitarianism, argues on the moral rightness of a decision based on its outcome. Clearly, both moral theories have had an immense impact that have carried on in today’s society as well.

Read More
867 Words | 4 Pages

Utilitarianism is a form of consequential theory and has two central branches that I will define and apply to this engineering and environmental disaster. This theory depends only on the consequences of decisions, through consequentialist theories pleasure is seen as the most important outcome. It tests which of the available options would create the most happiness and the least unhappiness. The morally responsible choices are the ones that create the most net pleasure meaning that as long as the positives and pleasures outweigh the negatives and displeasures. One of the key tenants of measuring the positives is to determine the amount of people who will experience pleasure and the depth or intensity of said pleasure.

Read More
183 Words | 1 Pages

Utilitarian hypotheses bolster the thought

Read More
1565 Words | 7 Pages

Bernard Williams’ essay, A Critique of Utilitarianism, launches a rather scathing criticism of J. J. C. Smart’s, An Outline of a System of Utilitarian ethics. Even though Williams claims his essay is not a direct response to Smart’s paper, the manner in which he constantly refers to Smart’s work indicates that Smart’s version of Utilitarianism, referred to as act-Utilitarianism, is the main focus of Williams’ critique. Smart illustrates the distinction between act-Utilitarianism and rule-Utilitarianism early on in his work. He says that act-Utilitarianism is the idea that the rightness of an action depends on the total goodness of an action’s consequences.

Read More
208 Words | 1 Pages

To look at whether restraint is ethical, Utilitarianism and Kant’s ethical theory can be applied to cases where patients have been restrained. These theories have different ways for deciding if an act is acceptable or not. Utilitarian theory is the belief (based on morals) that an action is right if it creates the greatest good for the most people. It is based on the calculated consequence or outcome of a specific action. If somebody using an utilitarian approach thinks an action would bring the most pleasure or happiness to the majority of people then it would be the right thing to do.

Read More
1046 Words | 5 Pages

The Goal of Life In order to judge the importance of these values in enriching our lives, we must first define what makes a life enriched. Mustapha Mond, a Controller in Brave New World, would argue that happiness is the most important aspect of life and that the best life has the greatest amount of happiness. This is similar to the philosopher Epicurus’ belief that man should maximize pleasure and minimize pain in order to live a ‘blessed life’; happiness being used interchangeably with pleasure in this text (360).

Read More
284 Words | 2 Pages

With state-sanctioned punishment being supported by the belief that it is beneficial to the populace as a whole, utilitarians and retributivists alike agree that there is necessity. Though, beyond this point, the two philosophical views seem to split not when determining not the need, but rather the parameters, of coercive force. To a utilitarian, punishment is warranted as necessary based on the consequences of the punishment - that it will provide future benefits to the individual or maximize the happiness of a community. As a utilitarian, Jeremy Bentham justifies the normative grounds for legal punishment through these consequences. Utilitarianism, in this sense, is known as a consequentialist theory in that it concerns itself primarily

Read More
1438 Words | 6 Pages

One of the major dilemmas in the philosophical community surrounds which moral theory should determine whether an action is right or wrong. Philosophers have sought a solution to the problem since it involves important aspects of daily life, namely how to judge the moral worth and acceptability of actions. Different utilitarian theories have been proposed, but a criticism regarding the way they address promises and justice poses a problem. This criticism must be analyzed through act and rule utilitarian perspectives to determine whether either form of utilitarianism can be a plausible theory of morality. In this paper, I will examine the theory of utilitarianism.

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

Separating his own theory from Bentham’s, Mill argued that since the quality cannot be quantified, the quantitative calculus is unreasonable. Thus, the quality of happiness is more important than the quantity. That is, one should qualify the action not to count it. By this, the utilitarianism tries to achieve the 'highest pleasures' for the most amount of

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

It is a results-based concept that gives no weight to the intentions that drive actions but, rather, places emphasis on the consequences of such actions. With specific reference to Bentham’s Utilitarianism and his incorporation of Hedonistic Calculus, this theory is simply derived from human being’s primal desires to seek pleasure and restrict pain, and suggests that morally good actions are those which would accomplish such. Furthermore, the idea of striving to achieve ‘the greatest amount of good for the greatest number’ fuels an objection to this theory when considering the minority,

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

Although the consequences of Hoyvald’ decision produced overall happiness according to a vague quantitative measurement, his decision wasn’t the best one. The quantitative measurement, also known as the “hedonistic calculus”, is a procedure used by Bentham to calculate the pleasures and pains of a decision’s outcomes to support his theory (Bentham, 32). By following this procedure, we are overshadowing the reasons that caused such pleasures and pains to occur. In Hoyvald’s case, he must have chosen the decision that was ethically right rather than the decision that was the best for his own sake, meaning that it caused more pleasure than pain. And by that we approach the definition of what is ethically right and what is not.

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

And finally, some people believes that common sense is wrong. They have three responses to go against the anti-utilitarian arguments; all values have a utilitarian basis, our gut reactions can’t be trusted sometimes, and that we should focus all the

Read More
1685 Words | 7 Pages

The hedonic calculus has seven different criteria that must be considered to evaluate the balance between good and evil. This appears practical and easy to use in any situation; however, it has its issues. For example, Bentham suggested that all pleasure and pain should be measured equally. This causes a major problem when put into the context of business ethics, as it suggests that the pain experienced by a child forced to work in a factory is equal to a shareholder in a business gaining a little more profit – surely, this is unethical. J.S. Mill noticed this issue, introducing rule utilitarianism, in which he recognised the differences in different types of pleasures.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism

Related Topics

Open Document