If they were to be rated on a scale of 1-10, the book would be about a 7.5 and the movie maybe a 5.5. The movie was not as intriguing as the book. The book catches ones attention by specifying what goes on very clearly and getting straight to the point, not providing any unnecessary information. Let´s just make this short, simple, and to the point, if you watched the movie you would probably not want to read the book since it did not catch enough of ones attention to be interested. On the other hand, if you read the book first and afterwards watch the movie you probably will not appreciate the movie as much as you did the
A Call To Action Fans: Rhetorical Analysis of Promotional Techniques in the Trailer “Baby Driver” (2017) Action films are among the most common in the movie industry. The movie "Baby Driver" is action-based with a plot that is similar in structure and reminiscent of that of a classic action movie. The 2017 film, directed by Edgar Wright, follows Baby as he navigates his troubles with the mafia. While he is working with the mafia, he also finds himself falling in love with the other main protagonist Debora.
The movie was much more efficient for me because I am a slow reader and I do not do well with comprehending reading. The movie gave me a quick way of watching and understanding what was going on. It was much faster for me than reading the book. Although the book gave a good accurate presentation, the movie gave me a visual and factual presentation.
My favorite being the book for many reasons. I prefer it because it has more details, many more characters and I also felt like the movie was everywhere. Meaning that it didn’t flow as smoothly as the book for the reason of the order. For example when I said that there where more details in the book it included the characters.
The movie,Freak the Mighty, is an adventurous, exciting, funny, and emotional movie. The movie is better than the book,Freak the Mighty. The movie and book are very similar;however, the movie is exceptional. There are some reasons why the movie is better than the book. Those reasons are: the book is more funny, emotional, over all more fun to watch and enjoy.
The movie is both funny and action packed but the book is more detailed. So I enjoyed the book more. The film forgot a lot of characters and changed many scenes and it really frustrated me. Also in the book you can see more character development. Even though the film was not exactly like the book the director did a great job, and this still is one of my favorite movies.
First of all, I think this because the movie showed more which made me comprehend it more. The setting in the movie made me comprehend it more which in the movie I didn’t see the setting that well. Another reason why I think the movies made me comprehend it more is because I got to visually see where the characters were living and telling us their story.
To summarize this essay, there are several points that highlight differences between the two films, yet the overall context of the film remains the same. One common theme that tends to drive the force between the reasoning in why the two films have varying aspects is because they were made for slightly different audiences at different times in society. Though both versions of the movie have small portions that vary from one another, the main emphasis is the same and both versions are loved by the
The book had a better beginning because you get a sense of the characters and the plot. The book has a clear beginning whereas the movie does not. The beginning of the movie left me confused and unsure.
Many people who just go for the movie will not notice a thing. Sometimes the director improves the movie or sometimes the changes make the movie worse. We see the effect of a movie changed from the original book in the novel, The Hobbit. Peter Jackson applies many changes to JRR Tolkien’s masterpiece in many different ways. This book is a fantasy about many creatures and animals trying to stop a party of dwarves and one little hobbit from having the adventure of a lifetime.
The first movie “Walt Disney’s Pocahontas” and the second movie is “The New World”. Both showed the journey of the colonists and the epic love story of Pocahontas and John Smith. But the New World did just a little better of a job at being more historically accurate. To begin with, the plots were very different in both of the movies but “The New World” is more accurate. In “Pocahontas” it showed her falling in love with John Smith and then saving him from dying.
There are details left out of the movie that were in the book, the movie doesn 't demonstrate the ongoing theme of hunger as well as the book does, and the the movie does a better job with
In "Mockingjay Part 2," he takes a more measured and a few different approaches. He still uses fast editing and intense visuals, but he also incorporates more wide shots and longer takes to give the viewer a better sense of the overall situation. He also focused more on character development and emotional storytelling to make the audience invested in the action. This approach made the action scenes feel more genuine and allowed the audience to connect with the characters on a deeper
In contrast, the film trailer Inside Man introduced the narration through the form of dialogue, where the characters converse with one another which creates credibility to the characters. This is a representation of a 21st century film juxtaposed to Back to the Future which was produced in 1985 where the narrator informs the audience about the premise, this is an example of how film trailers have developed over time. The discrepancy between Inside Man and Back to the Future is the narration, as it demonstrates a more thriller sense through the scenes. This engages the interest of viewers who enjoy the thriller/drama genre which is consistent throughout, whereas in the film trailer Back to the Future, the narration engages the viewers who enjoy a more sci-fi/comedic
It had more narration so the reader could understand what is happening. Secondly, the movie. The movie was different than the book. It had some parts that were in the book, but it lacked some details.
