ipl-logo

Reflection In Critical Thinking

1323 Words6 Pages

Throughout the last twelve weeks, I have spent my times working on the report for the subject “Critical Thinking” with Khánh Linh and Nhật Linh. During the first six weeks of the project, we have teamed up together to gather as much information as possible on the fields that interest us the most and then proceeded to narrow down to the topic that all three members feel the most suitable to work on. After careful considerations, we’ve chosen the topic relating to the protection of LGBT adolescents in Vietnam for our report. At week six, the team chose me as the team leader because our team members believed that I’m capable of pushing all the members to fulfil their responsibilities and organizing our working schedule. Moreover, I was in charge …show more content…

As the team leader, I was also responsible for collecting everyone’s works and integrate them into the report. Throughout our time working together, I had proven that my team members did not make the wrong choice. In order to create more opportunities for the team members to discuss and suggest new ideas to our report, I made a Facebook page for the team. This had given Khánh Linh the chance to suggest the team to open a google Drive account so that it could facilitate the process of gathering everyone’s work. In addition, to supervise each member’s working progress, I posted a weekly reminder including a deadline for submitting our work to Google Drive on our Facebook page at the beginning of the week. This idea not only boosted the productivity of our team but also provided all members the chance to supervise each other’s works. If a member missed the weekly deadline, we could always notify him or her through Facebook so that they could finish their …show more content…

Nevertheless, at week ten, problems emerged as the team members started to have conflict over the outline of the body. Feeling that part of Nhật Linh’s works was irrelevant, I suggested to remove them from our work so that the report would be more compelling. However, this suggestion was criticized by both members of the team. Still, I accepted that all three members have different point of views and I should listen to their explanations to see whether or not I was making the wrong choice. After much discussion, we decide to keep Nhật Linh’s work but made a few adjustments to the outline of our

Open Document