Religious Freedom in Public Schools
The First Amendment states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Because of increased acts of terrorism many students are turning to prayer, but find they can’t. First I will talk about what is already allowed, then I will talk about what Freedom From Religion Foundation thinks, and finally what I believe.
The law states that no teacher or school administrator may teach religion and must remain neutral on any religious matter. The law also says that students are not held to the same rules as school authorities and may do everything except forcibly try to convert fellow students. Teachers can teach about religion, but they can not teach religion.
…show more content…
The FFRF thinks that there should be no crossover between religion and the public. Some have even gone as far to say that there should be severe punishments to those who do not comply. The FFRF wants a complete separation from church in state. They say anything remotely religious in public schools should be illegal. For example the FFRF thinks that just asking for a moment of silence is too religious and schools should ask for a moment of bedlam. The FFRF also thinks that public schools are for all children, whether they are Catholic, Baptist, Atheist, Buddhist, Agnostic, or Jewish. Therefore public schools should be free of all religious observances and oppression. They also think that it is the duty of parents and churches to teach their children what they believe and anything that doesn’t allow the parents to teach their children takes away the parents God given right to teach their children their beliefs. Does this limit students to much on how they can