Although it's a complex story, George Orwell's "1984" vividly depicts what life would be like in Oceania under the rule of the enigmatic "Big Brother." The book goes into great depth about a society where surveillance is common, freedom is long gone, and even the very idea of truth is manipulated. As you can see, the idea of a fair hearing is not only nonexistent in this kind of dystopia; it goes against everything the Party stands for. This essay suggests that giving everyone the right to a fair trial would have made Oceania a much better place to live by bringing some sense of justice and humanity to an otherwise very sad world. The Sixth Amendment “The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a fair trial for people accused of crimes. This …show more content…
In this situation, giving everyone the right to a fair trial, which includes the right to a defense, the right to an impartial judge, and the assumption of innocence, would have completely changed how power worked in Oceania. The fate of people sent to the Ministry of Love is a key example of how terrible things can get when there isn't a fair hearing. Nobody gets a trial here, and they are tortured until they reveal their deepest beliefs (Orwell, "1984", Ch. III. The aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid afores Having fair trials would require a legal system that doesn't depend on what the Party wants, which would weaken the Party's control over fact and truth. People would be able to question the Party's accusations and show where its supposed proof falls short, which would make the system more accountable. The Party's use of Newspeak and doublethink to change reality could have been stopped by the right to a fair hearing. Throughout the book, the Party changes history records and spreads lies to keep up its story that it is perfect (Orwell, "1984", p. 40). If people could formally disagree with the Party's