ipl-logo

Why Is Oj Simpson Unfair

1167 Words5 Pages

Unfair Trial:The People vs. OJ Simpson The United States of America, supposedly land of the free and home of the brave. This is somewhat true in some sense but there is one aspect of the US that seems to lack this quote, fair trial. What is a fair trial you may ask. “Fair trial is the privilege to a reasonable trial is a crucial shield to guarantee that people are shielded from unlawful or subjective hardship of their human rights and opportunities, above all of the privilege to freedom and security of individual.” (Langford 1) Many people are blinded by the quote “land of the free and home of the brave” and don’t see how corrupt our court systems are and many cases show this instance for example the People vs. OJ Simpson. This is only one …show more content…

Many people that heard of or attended his trial were utterly shocked of his conviction and the way it played out, but there was also those few who had a smirk on their face as he was put in prison for 33 years and had to served 9 without parole. First let's go over the basics of his trial and how it played out. The main reason this trial was unfair is the evidence the court had to try and prove that OJ was guilty, they basically didn’t any legitimate evidence. "June 5, 1995, in court, Simpson tries on a pair of calfskin gloves associated with the case, and says they don't fit."(OJ Fast Facts 1) “Also on October 23, 1996 a civil trial starts in a wrongful death suit brought against OJ by the victims families.”(OJ Fast Facts 1) This shows much unfairness against OJ because the case hadn’t even been figured to be guilty and they considered and death suit against OJ. Also between OJ being arrested and him actually showing up in trial to testify was a time period of 3-6 months, that means he had to stay in jail 3-6 months before his trial even began. The courtroom also tried to control OJ and make him do things he shouldn’t have to do. “March 26, 1997, The court orders Simpson to turn over his belongings, including an arrangement of golf clubs, his 1968 Heisman Trophy, and a Warhol painting.”(OJ Fast Facts) This is completely unacceptable …show more content…

This is also where the Declaration of Independence (the US Constitution) makes its home and it is suppose to give American citizens there life, liberty, and prosperity. For example the right to a fair trial, you must have strong enough evidence to convict a suspect until then they are innocent until proven guilty. This is a right clearly stated in the Declaration of Independence but however it is not followed hardly at all considering many trials end with putting the people in jail for no reason and ending their chance at good life. That's all politics are worried about these days is control and they do a good job at it since there is not enough people that pay attention to this and try and stop it. So the reason that the right to a fair trial is invalid is that you can look out through history for one African Americans rarely ever win any trials this shows racism, most times there isn’t enough evidence to convict a person in the case of OJ Simpson for instance, and it is unfair to not give a citizen his or her fair trial after they have been held for more than a day. First racism, if the courtroom was really fair then there wouldn’t be any convictions just based on skin color or because you just don’t like that person and

Show More
Related
414 Words | 2 Pages

In the end, O.J. Simpson was found not guilty for the

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

OJ Simpson and Lizzie Borden Verdict How would you feel knowing that two ruthless murders were walking your town's streets, at your local stores,waving at your children,and talking to your loved ones? It wouldn’t feel pleasant,would it?   That’s why Lizzie Borden and Oj Simpson need to be locked up.

Read More
1540 Words | 7 Pages

Orenthal James Simpson, better known as O.J. Simpson, is a former American football star and actor. Simpson was tried in 1995 for the murders of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown and her friend, Ron Goldman. This trial, referred to by some as the “Trial of the Century,” was one of the most riveting, high-profile cases in years, and was, in essence, an amped up reality T.V. show, featuring celebrities, athletes, intransigent attorneys, and touchy subjects such as domestic abuse, stalking, and even murder. At the time of the trial, nearly every eye was tuned in to this captivating drama as it played out. But how did Simpson find himself in this situation?

Read More
1829 Words | 8 Pages

Simpson Trials.) One of the first questions was about the footprints that were leaving the crime scene. The prosecution asked O.J. if he had the shoes that would leave a footprint like that on the ground, after O.J. said no, then multiple pictures came up of O.J. wearing the same shoes that he said he did not have. (Edelman) After the evidence was piling up against O.J. the jury came to a verdict and on February 4, 1997, the jury made a decision that O.J. was liable for 8.5 million in compensatory damages, and lost some of his memorabilia.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The case lasted eight months, which resulted in Simpson being ruled guilty for the murders. After analyzing the evidence provided in the case, I believe that O.J. Simpson was correctly found guilty of the murders of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman. The first piece of evidence that I think helps prove O.J. was guilty was the blood stains. These blood stains

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

OJ Simpson was a very achieved person player until he made one big mistake. The trial of OJ Simpson was a long stressful process to prove a star innocent or guilty of murder. This took Place in the state of California on October 3, 1995. OJ was tried for a murder crime of his ex-wife and another man. In the end OJ turned out to be not guilty of this crime.

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

¨In matters of truth or justice, there is no difference between large and small problems, for issues concerning the treatment of people are all the same¨-Albert Einstein. The justice system, however, is imbibed with many problems. We can, however, try to lessen these problems with achieving justice as we identified some faults of in achieving justice of all and the justice system. One problem with achieving justice is people are sometimes guilty until proven innocent like when Charlie was immediately thought of as guilty without a chance to prove his innocence. Another problem imbibed in our justice system is innocent people as sometimes convicted like Michael Morton.

Read More
144 Words | 1 Pages

The evidence against Simpson (ex. The glove, suicide note, the crime scene itself) also shows how the judicial system

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

America gives any defendant a trial by judge, unless the judge allows a trial by jury. There are certain cases that need a better balance between a guilty verdict and the defendant’s freedom. Murder trials often receive 12 jurors to decide the defendant’s fate, while civil cases often have a judge making the verdict. The issue lies in citizens because they are unaware of the seriousness that presides in choosing another human’s future. Judges should be the only decision makers to choose a verdict which gives a defendant a fair trial in how they will use fact over feeling, they will be focused on deciding the verdict, and they are aware of the moral issues that may come out in a case.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

“Detective Fuhrman, did you plant or manufacture any evidence in this case,” - Johnnie Cochran (393). The defense is able to handle to the trial’s witnesses fittingly as they allow them to pursue many views of the case to persuade the Jury. These hardships of the prosecution helped lead to the innocence of O.J.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

I think there is more evidence proving his innocence than his guiltiness. The corruption in this case and the racism in the LAPD helped the defense show that there was not enough evidence to prove that OJ was guilty. There are many reasons why I think OJ is innocent, but the piece of evidence that I think is most important is that all of OJ’s blood at the crime scene contained EDTA. EDTA is something that is put in test tubes with blood to prevent blood clots. EDTA is not found naturally in people's blood, which means someone had to have planted OJ’s blood at the scene.

Read More
1788 Words | 8 Pages

Jury selection began and it took up to six months. Jury was 12 people, 10 women, 2 men, 9 black, 2 white, and one hispanic (Tobin). Opening statements took place January 24 the following year (Key Dates). The court room had full 24-hour video coverage of the trial. As millions watched on tv as Christopher Darden led off the prosecution's opening statement by portraying Simpson as an abusive husband and a jealous lover of Nicole.

Read More
1494 Words | 6 Pages

The percent of white Americans who believed that Simpson was guilty jumped from sixty-eight percent to eighty-nine percent. The overall percent of Americans back when the crime happened who believed that Simpson was guilty was sixty-six percent and today it has jumped to eighty-three percent. This could have changed the way the trial went twenty years ago; Simpson might have been

Read More
1100 Words | 5 Pages

Darby’s partner Aimes received the death penalty, but was not given a fair trial. In the Bill of Rights, it says, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial” (Amendment VI). The justice system was letting a killer out in exchange for a confession, if a killer confesses then they deserve the maximum sentencing. Bargaining with a criminal who is guilty of a serious crime should not result in the minimum sentencing of that one individual, while one who was just there at the wrong time is punished worse. Does this mean our justice system is a joke for letting a killer off that easy because of a

Read More
1610 Words | 7 Pages

OJ Simpson is Indeed Innocent “If it doesn’t fit, you have to acquit,” this quote said by one of OJ Simpson’s attorneys, Johnny Cochran, is widely known for its impact on the controversial case of OJ Simpson. From 1994-1995 OJ Simpson was known as one of the most controversial cases in the USA due to the verdict that OJ was innocent of the murders of his ex wife and one of her friends. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman met an untimely demise, and the only suspect the police ever reviewed was OJ Simpson. OJ was later caught in a low speed chase in a white Ford Bronco before being taken into custody and put on trial. In the sensationally controversial court case involving OJ Simpson as a suspect for murder, The innocent ruling

Read More

More about Why Is Oj Simpson Unfair

Related Topics

Open Document