ipl-logo

Review Of The Federalist Fallacy: Popular Authority Under Elite Rule

1934 Words8 Pages

Roxi Wessel
Professor Anderson
Political Science 232
17 March 2023
The Federalist Fallacy: Popular Authority Under Elite Rule In the fall of 1787, three men embarked on a quest of words and wits to push for the ratification of the new United States Constitution in the state of New York. Collectively known as “Publius”, John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison used their 85-essay series, entitled the Federalist, to defend the constitutional approach to government, justifying choices as broad as centralized government and as narrow as the presidential age requirement. However, one of Publius’s central arguments–that the final political authority of the United States, under the Constitution, will reside solely with the people–falls …show more content…

In Hamilton’s very first contribution to the Federalist, he writes that “the love of power [and] the desire of preeminence” have a “constant operation on the collective body of society”, a clear illustration that he does not believe the people to be capable of wielding power without causing a national dissolution into corruption (20). Madison, meanwhile, openly criticizes several motions supported by the majority of working class citizens at the time (including “paper money”, the “abolition of debts”, and an “equal division of property”) as “improper and wicked” (10). Hence, Publius simultaneously pays lip service to poor New York workers and significantly resists the same authority it claims to protect, further betraying the lack of trust in the working class that Hamilton so callously displays in his early papers. Publius also claims that the working class often errs in its legislative judgment, which necessitates elite intervention. One of Madison’s main arguments in support of the Senate, a body which was not elected by the people at the time, is that the institution “may sometimes be necessary, as a defense to the people against their own temporary errors and delusions” (63). This argument for using elite, state-appointed officials as a safeguard …show more content…

Madison rhapsodizes at length about the dangers of factionalism under majority rule; he claims that “popular government [...] enables [the majority] to sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest, both the public good and the rights of other citizens”, thus insinuating that popular rule in a system where “the causes of factionalism cannot be prevented” will ultimately devastate both the working class’s public good and the elite class’s private right (10). This fear mongering over majority rule acts as a ringing endorsement of the alternative: minority, or elite, political dominance. To ease the minds of his readers, Madison then declares that the working class of the new republic will be too spread out and otherwise divided to oppose the just government established by the upper class–or, in his words, lower classes will be “rendered, by their number and local situation, unable to concert and carry into effect schemes of oppression” against the elite (10). In this way, Madison promotes upper class rule as a means to protect American liberty, believing that the people at large were unfit to establish this protection themselves–and that they had neither the intelligence nor the unity to carry out their corrupt schemes under properly conducted elite

Show More
Related
1255 Words | 6 Pages

Tola APGOPO 10/9/12 Exemplar Large Republic: Best Control of Effects of Factions Federalist 10 Summary: In Federalist 10, James Madison or Publius asserts that the Constitution establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. He states that Antifederalist complain that the government is too unstable, claim rival parties disregard the public good, and that decisions are made by the majority rather than by justice and the rights of the minority. Madison goes on to define a faction as a group of citizens, either a majority or minority, whose actions are motivated by a passion or interest that hurts the rights of other citizens or goes against the best interests of the

Read More
243 Words | 1 Pages

Perhaps the most famous Federalist paper, Federalist 10, starts off by saying that one of the biggest arguments that favors the Constitution is that it creates a government suited to minimize the harm caused by factions. Faction, in this case, is defined as a group of people whether a minority or majority based on class, race, and profession that all share a common interest. It was inevitable that factions would occur and perhaps the defining characteristic was the unequal distribution of property. This would ultimately lead the poor without property to become the majority in a “tyranny of the masses.” Madison believed that there were two solutions in preventing majority factions, 1) Remover the causes, and 2) Control the effects.

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

(1).” This group did not the Constitution did not properly state the rights and powers of the three branches of government, states’ rights, etc. In order to please the Anti-federalists, the Preamble was put into place to allow American citizens know the central government’s rights, and states’ rights. Lecture 15 “Questions to Consider #1”: In what ways does the modern American economy resemble the plan set out in Hamilton’s three great reports?

Read More
857 Words | 4 Pages

Madison first defines the “violence of faction” as he explains that governments often make decisions by the “superior force of an interested and overbearing majority” instead of according to the “rules of justice.” In framing this situation, he explains the issue that majority factions or parties in governments have, in the past, had the ability to rule without consideration of minority parties. Outlining possible solutions for this problem, Madison continues to explain that the causes of parties cannot be removed without destroying people’s freedom to make their own choices. This destruction would counter Madison’s purpose of removing factions in the first place, as it would inhibit people’s liberty. Using this logic, Madison asserts an inevitability to the formation of parties and thus concludes that the government must instead control their effects by either preventing “the same passion or interest in a majority” or controlling the “number and local situation” of the majority.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

Beard, and the argument was that the constitution created in 1787 allowed the rich and powerful to maintain their wealth (Palmer, P.172). However, Palmer uses another author, Robert Brown to disprove Beard’s theory. The theory was that the upper class in the United States was less “ caste-conscious” than in Europe (Palmer, P.172). This lack of consciousness made it so the upper class was able to work with the rest of the country to govern because both had the common goal of independence (Palmer. P.172). Palmer gives the example of George Mason, a very wealthy man from Virginia who advocated for giving representation to the lower class.

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout Federalist 10, Madison warned his audience of the dangers of factions. Madison believed that as long as people espoused differing opinions, came from different backgrounds, and especially, as long as there was an unequal distribution of property, people would form factions with like-minded individuals whose ideologies they shared. This grouping of people of America, in his opinion, would lead to great violence in the country that could harm the nation’s wellbeing. In order to remedy this problem, in which he viewed unequal distribution of property as the main culprit, Madison decided that setting up a Republic which would be composed of only the most qualified candidates and would be composed of a multitude of factions would be

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

Anthony​ ​Bell​ ​II Mrs.​ ​Brubaker AP​ ​US​ ​History​ ​Period​ ​5 25​ ​September​ ​2017 Interpreting​ ​The​ ​Constitution The​ ​foundation​ ​of​ ​American​ ​democracy​ ​lies​ ​within​ ​our​ ​most​ ​important​ ​document,​ ​the​ ​US Constitution.​ ​​ ​However,​ ​since​ ​this​ ​document​ ​was​ ​created​ ​there​ ​have​ ​been​ ​those​ ​who​ ​believed​ ​that it​ ​was​ ​to​ ​be​ ​interpreted​ ​exactly​ ​as​ ​it​ ​was​ ​written​ ​and​ ​there​ ​have​ ​been​ ​those​ ​who​ ​believed​ ​that​ ​it was​ ​open​ ​for​ ​interpretation.​ ​​ ​The​ ​federalists,​ ​led​ ​by​ ​Alexander​ ​Hamilton​ ​believed​ ​in​ ​a​ ​loose interpretation,​ ​while​ ​the​

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

The topic of the night was the national debt crisis. Alexander Hamilton, a strong supporter of federal assumption, and James Madison, a loyal Virginian, were among the guests of this carefully calculated soiree. Personal motivations of wealth and power guided their conversations. Hamilton’s economic plan was devised to benefit the urban elite, who were, in his mind, the keystone of American economics. States like Virginia that had managed to pay off large amounts of their debt, now risked being charged more in new taxes under Hamilton’s plan.

Read More
843 Words | 4 Pages

Under representation of these “chosen body of citizens”, Madison asserted that, “the public voice, pronounced by the representatives of the people, will be more consonant to the public good than if pronounced by the people themselves.” The argument of the Constitution on representatives is, when the authority from the people is given to representatives, those representatives make decisions that will safe-guard and protect the liberty of the people. Contrary to what Madison had insisted the Constitution would do under representatives, anti-federalist views presume the liberties of the people are jeopardized when their authority is placed into the hands of people that share no common interests with you. Enclosed in Brutus III, the question is asked, “what security therefore can there be for the people, where their liberties and property are at the disposal of so few men?” To inhibit the absence of connection between representatives and the people, the Constitution, Madison claimed, “forms a happy combination in this respect; the great and aggregate interests being referred to the national, the local and particular to the State legislatures”.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Madison is analyzing the way to deal with the growing faction problem. He begins his essay by defining factions for the reader. “By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of

Read More
425 Words | 2 Pages

Around this era of the late 1700’s, the citizens of the newly independent nation of “America” were in the process of ratifying their government from the Articles of Confederation to the current Constitution which allowed for a democratic republic. The people in support of this ratification were the “Federalist” whom often used pamphlet writings known as the “Federalist Papers” to persuade and inform the public of their ideas and Constitution ratification. The most influential paper among the 85, is the Federalist paper #10 that disproves the Antifederalists’ argument that a republic of any kind would fall from the pressure of multiple divisive opinions among its citizens. Given the nature of humans by God, creating factions based on similar

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

46, written again by James Madison, he emphasizes that the national and state governments are two totally contrastive organizations. By expressing that they are separate but are still able to connect on various platforms, Madison reveals that the power of these governments lie in the people. Furthermore, the people’s instinctive presence will always influence the governments of their respective states, therefore the federal government must, in relation, be exceptionally compliant with the people. As said in true terms, “ The adversaries of the Constitution seem to have lost sight of the people altogether in their reasonings on this subject; and to have viewed these different establishments, not only as mutual rivals and enemies, but as uncontrolled by any common superior in their efforts to usurp the authorities of each other. These gentlemen must here be reminded of their error.

Read More
936 Words | 4 Pages

This reflection paper involves my insights by responding to questions on Excerpts from the Federalist No.1, written on October 27, 1787. which is one of many essays by Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton tried desperately to defend the constitution for the good of the people even though he had certain doubts and wanted to ratify it. The questions I will be answering are related to what he has written and what my opinions are. I will answer to the best of my knowledge and my thoughts.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

In the case of taxation, the more powerful of the two parties would have the opportunity to impose higher taxes on the minority, thus, saving themselves money. Madison firmly believed that the constitution had the ability to solve the problems created by factions. Madison envisioned a large republic that would make it difficult for corrupt candidates to get elected. Madison expressed this by stating, In the next place, as each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens in the large than in the small republic, it will be more difficult for unworthy candidates to practice with success the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried; and the suffrages of the people being more free, will be more likely to centre in men who possess the most attractive merit and the most diffusive and established characters.

Read More

More about Review Of The Federalist Fallacy: Popular Authority Under Elite Rule

Related Topics

Open Document