ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of Atoms For Peace

900 Words4 Pages

Atoms for Peace” is a speech delivered by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, to the United Nations General Assembly in New York City on December 8, 1945. Eisenhower created the speech from the fear of the rapid development of nuclear weapons after World War II and his fear that it was leading the world to destruction. His goal of the speech was to influence the American people to accept steps towards arms control because he felt it was essential that they were told the true magnitude of the destructive power that had been developed in nuclear weapons. In his speech, “Atoms for Peace” Eisenhower combined warning with a hopeful plan for turning atomic energy into a benefit to mankind. During this speech, he makes clear use of ethos, pathos, and …show more content…

Eisenhower used these precise words to let his audience know that the United States was not the only country who had knowledge of deadly atomic weapons. Not only our allies, but also our enemies, knew of the power of atomic weaponry. The use of promise of gain, Eisenhower is very adamant in his speech, about the great power that could be achieved by atomic energy and what great benefit it would be not only in America but the world. Eisenhower said in his speech “The more important responsibility of this atomic energy agency would be to devise methods whereby this fissionable material would be allocated to serve the peaceful pursuits of mankind. Experts would be mobilized to apply atomic energy to the needs of agriculture, medicine, and other peaceful activities. A special purpose would be to provide abundant electrical energy in the power-starved areas of the world.” According to presidency.ucsb.edu a Statement by Eisenhower Upon Signing the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 was “The new Act permits us, under proper security safeguards, to give our allies certain information that they must have for an effective defense against aggression. This information includes data needed for training in the use of and defense against atomic weapons and for evaluating the atomic capabilities of a potential

Show More
Related

New World Order Rhetorical Analysis

119 Words | 1 Pages

Today, after going through the information revolution, the United States are planning or framing up ‘New World Order’ that is based on the three points that one is the military power which centered nuclear weapons in it, and second is holding dollars as a key currency, and also third is the occupation of English language as a computer language and common words. E.W. Said just commented about this point in his book ‘Culture and imperialism’ that after the Cold War it seems that in the ‘New World Order’ suggested by the United States government, with self-admiration, a victory declaration for show and a sense of responsibility exaggerated, most of rhetoric were preoccupied by a person’s words of Conrad described.

Read More

The Patriot Rhetorical Analysis

64 Words | 1 Pages

Finally, the film “The Patriot” by Robert Rodat uses the archetypes of the quest for revenge and the fall to reveal how we as humans are willing to go to war for freedom, and for family, and unite people together under one cause. People are willing to go to war for family, freedom, revenge and to bring together a country or group of people.

Read More

Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bombs

1889 Words | 8 Pages

The Manhattan Project was started in fears that Nazi Germany was going to create the ultimate weapon, powered by the natural forces of fission. As President and wartime Commander, Roosevelt

Read More

Examples Of Guilt In The Salem Witch Trials

1037 Words | 5 Pages

“In 1994, the Soviets tested an atom bomb of their own.” (History.com Staff, "Cold War History"). This act caused President Truman to spend more money on the army and defense of the United States and panic and hysteria spread to the minds of the people of our country. “...and the world lived under the threat of thermonuclear war for the first time.” (History.com Staff, "Soviets explode atomic bomb").

Read More

The Ministry Of Truth Rhetorical Analysis

168 Words | 1 Pages

Winston works for “The Ministry of Truth” in which they rewrite history, but they had a significant slogan. The slogan that they had was “ War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength”. After reading this, the reader could tell that they are using irony to run their society. War is Peace, means that in their society, keeping the people believe that constant war is actually a way of maintaining peace, and if there is constant war, then the people of this society are constantly giving, sacrificing, and pledging devotion to their government, which ends up giving the government more power. Freedom is Slavery, means that people probably believe having total freedom is actually a way to become enslaved, in which the government tries to

Read More

How Did The Us Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb Dbq

905 Words | 4 Pages

As Dwight D. Eisenhower remarked to Harry S. Truman in July of 1945 in document C, “it was my personal opinion that no power on earth could keep the Red Army out of the war unless victory came before they could get in” (Doc C). The private conversation between Eisenhower and Truman means that what was said was not censored and was Eisenhower speakly freely to the president, which provides a sense of honesty. Eisenhower expressed his concern of the growing power of the Soviet Union and president Truman also held similar beliefs. In 1941, he is quoted as saying, “ If we see Germany winning, we ought to help Russia and if we see Russia winning we ought to help Germany and that way let them kill as many as many as possible” Truman holded no love for the Russians and the desire to show off to the Soviets played a minor role in the decision to drop the bomb. The main reason for dropping the atomic bomb was to force the surrender of the

Read More

Why Did Einstein's Letter To The President Cause The United States To Create Atomic Bombs?

527 Words | 3 Pages

Having the knowledge of how to create atomic bombs would be enough to start trying to create our own. Having that massive destructive power would be handy to have later on in the future. The letter was before the war started, so the United States could have been thinking about the war soon to come. Even with our resources being inferior, Albert Einstein addresses where there is good ore. Those places are Canada and former Czechoslovakia.

Read More

How Was Ronald Reagan Successful

1237 Words | 5 Pages

Reagan believed that a war shouldn’t be found or won by using nuclear weaponry because it had long term negative effects. Reagan was aware of the negative effects due to the nuclear weaponry previously used by the US used as an effort to win the war so he tried to gain attention from congress to support the treaty. Likewise Reagan addresses to the public ,“A treaty was put into action to try to stop the, he said, eliminates an entire class of nuclear missiles, provides the most intrusive arms-control inspection ever, and forces Moscow to dismantle more missiles than Washington does. ”(Hedrick Smith,1988) Furthermore, on March 23, 1983 Reagan

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Declaration Of Independence

918 Words | 4 Pages

Many believe that every human being must be treated as equals. It is significant that this law is strictly practiced in order to prevent a chaotic and rioting society. Thomas Jefferson, framer of the Declaration of Independence and secretary of state to President George Washington at the time, declared that “all men are created equal, and that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” This statement greatly appealed to numerous colonists after gaining freedom from Great Britain; however, not everyone agreed that Jefferson’s words are reinforced accordingly. One such individual who was the son of former slaves, a farmer, astronomer, mathematician, surveyor,

Read More

War Is Kind And Mankind Rhetorical Analysis

443 Words | 2 Pages

In a desperate attempt for peace, as ironic as it may be, we create chaos, resulting in the death of millions at a time. Firearms burn bright in the dim sun, exposing the vibrancy of blood-stained suits. As the bullets penetrate skin, the life of another innocent individual has already been lost. Families never to hear a last, “I love you” before their loved one tragically passes in a loud, chaotic mess. They run towards the danger, knowing exactly what result the soldiers might have gotten in the gamble of life or death.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Violence Vanquished

1017 Words | 5 Pages

For many years, there has been a lot of controversy centering on the rate at which crime and violence is happening in society. Steven Pinker, the author of “Violence Vanquished” states, “We believe our world is riddled with terror and war, but we may be living in the most peaceable era in the human existence.” This quote from the article proves to many people that our world isn’t as bad as it is made out to be. In the article “Violence Vanquished” Pinker uses Logos, and an argument of fact to support the article 's central message which stands to prove violence is at an all-time low in today’s society.

Read More

The Manhattan Project: The Creation Of The Atomic Bomb

626 Words | 3 Pages

In 1939, the scientific community, specifically German physicists had learned the secrets of splitting a uranium atom (The Manhattan Project” 2015). America realized that Adolf Hitler’s Germany obtained a massive amount of scientific talent. With their access had necessary raw materials and knowledge of the splitting of the uranium atom, they had the industrial capacity to produce an atomic bomb(“Manhattan Project”2014). The atomic bomb would eventually become the turning point of weaponry during World War II. On October 11, 1939, President Franklin D. Roosevelt received a letter from Albert Einstein about the splitting of the uranium atom which could be beneficial in developing weapons for America during World War II.

Read More

Szilard's Petition

677 Words | 3 Pages

Atomic power testament provides the nations with new means of destruction. The atomic bombs at our disposal mean only the first step in this direction and in that respect is almost no limit to the destructive power which will become available in the course of this development. Szilard organized his letter in a logical way hence the intended message is brought out emphatically. The letter opens with a strong introduction that indicates the dangers posed to the American nation as a result of the discovery of the atomic bomb, and its subsequent placement into the hands of the American military. The author then explains that the atomic bombs were useful in case America was at the threat of being attacked by the same weapons, but the phase of war then, did not favor the US using atomic bombs on Japan.

Read More

Nuclear Deterrence Between The United States And The Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics

262 Words | 2 Pages

The art of fear is essential in nuclear deterrence. Using the film Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) I will argue that nuclear deterrence is hard to achieve when communication of nuclear capabilities is not well established amongst states. In this paper, I will use the film Dr. Strangelove (1964) to argue how theories such as deterrence theory, realist theory, security dilemma, preventative war, pre-emptive war as well as relative gains and zero sum game led to a failure to achieve nuclear deterrence between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. To make my argument on how more nuclear weapons may hinder deterrence, this essay will proceed as follows; I will firstly discuss the how nuclear deterrence and mutually

Read More

Non Violence Rhetorical Analysis

519 Words | 3 Pages

Who would've thought that nonviolence could amount to anything, much less produce results that are far more effective than that produced through violence? There have been several figures in history who have conveyed the power nonviolence bears. It doesn't not lie in the hand off of anyone to take the life away from another, especially because once a life I taken, it can't be returned. When people partake in violence, there is sure to be at least one negative results. Often, much more than not, the violence ends in injuries or even death.

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Atoms For Peace

Related Topics

Open Document