It is evident that the Officer’s actions were unimportant to the plot and they did not further the dispute between the Capulets and the Montagues, unlike Tybalt’s actions which led directly to violence. Anger is a dangerous emotion that often creates difficult situations for all parties involved in the conflict. The tense feeling of anger can easily spiral out of control, frequently forming an inevitable snowball of rage, that becomes nearly impossible to reverse. Once a feeling of profound fury is reached, the emotion generally does not go away for a very long time. A strong hatred between two families, the Capulets and the Montagues, had a great deal of impact on the families for countless years. The feud, reached a point of no return when Tybalt, a member of the Capulets, instigated irreversible actions. In Act …show more content…
It is also important to note Tybalt’s role as an influential Capulet. Tybalt, has more impact than the Officer, who is not related to either of the families involved in the conflict. Thus, it is clear that Tybalt was substantially more authoritative in creating and furthering conflict. Another pivotal moment in the play marked the grave inevitability of violence within the families. As the tension was built up between Mercutio, a Montague, and Tybalt, the vexation of both the Capulets and Montagues became permanent. Mercutio, insinuates violence by saying, “O calm, dishonorable, vile submission!/Alla stoccata carries it away” (III.i.71-72). Mercutio’s monologue releases taunting words of violence. It is apparent that the personality of both Mercutio and Tybalt could not have been changed by any force, due to their extreme hate and readiness to engage in acts of violence. Moreover, the conflict and eventual violence was unalterable and inevitable and the Officer did not offer any clear impact on the outcome, although some may say that