Tybalt instigates Romeo when he said, “Romeo, the love I bear thee can afford no better term than this: thou art a villain” (3.1.31-32). Tybalt is insulting Romeo by calling him a villain, thus adding more tension to the situation. By doing so, this made Romeo more willing to fight. Romeo tried to avoid the fight more than once. Tybalt was determined to fight someone, which is supported by the fact that he went through with fighting Mercutio even after Romeo rejected the initial altercation.
In the tragic play Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, Mercutio and Tybalt have an argument which leads up to a fight to the death but they both end up dying. Even though some may believe it’s Mercutio’s fault for the deaths, I believe that it’s Tybalt’s fault for both of the deaths. I believe that Tybalt is responsible for both his own and Mercutio’s death because he is hot-headed and opinionated when it comes to listening to other people One of the Reasons Tybalt is to blame for both of the deaths is because of his careless action choice. After talking to Mercutio, Tybalt was furious and wanted to fight him “(Draws his sword)”
Before Mercutio’s death in act three Tybalt remarks “Romeo, the love I bear thee can afford No better term than this: thou art a villain.” (Shakespeare.3.1.61-62). As exemplified by this citation Tybalt clearly states his disdain for Romeo and this addition creates an underlying tone of disdain for their relationship as a whole. This has the opposite effect as intended on the two as their relationship grows stronger because of this adversity and this ultimately leads to their deaths to do irrational decisions made in the haste of love. Ultimately the decision that Tybalt makes that directly leads to the death of the lover is as Tybalt asserts “Boy, this shall not excuse the injuries That thou hast done
Though Mercutio should be held accountable for the fight that led to Tybalt’s and his own death in William Shakespeare Romeo and Juliet, Romeo’s inability to make sensible decisions in potentially challenging or stressful moments makes him most responsible. Mercutio’s taunting of Tybalt is justified as Tybalt had just called Romeo, his best friend, a villain. Contrastingly, Romeo’s behavior during the fight was irrational at best. In the first scene of the third act, Mercutio and Tybalt are dueling, Mercutio develops a wound which will lead to his death.
Forbear this outrage!/ Tybalt, Mercutio, the Prince expressly hath forbid this bandying in Verona streets. ”(Shakespeare III.I.84-86) Romeo yells that this behavior cannot be tolerated in these streets due to the rule that you my Prince have enlisted. With the critical analysis of these details, we can infer that Romeo was never trying to cause trouble and his initial intent was peace. However, Tybalt did not listen to this warning set by Romeo, and carries on instigating to fight Mercutio. Tybalt was arrogant and failed to listen to Romeo's reason, so because of his own faults he met his death.
The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, Tybalt is responsible for his own death because he has a history of killing, he has an attitude that instigates on problems, and he has grudges against Romeo. Tybalt is at fault for his own death because he has killed other people before. Romeo exclaims to Tybalt, after Tybalt killed Mercutio, “He’s alive and victorious, and Mercutio’s dead?” (3.1.84). In this quote, Romeo is wailing that a great person was just killed by Tybalt.
In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Tybalt is at the most of Mercutio’s death because of his explosive personality and temper, which led to him acting without thinking. In act 3 Scene 1, a tragic and dramatic fight takes place, where Mercutio was struck by Tybalt and as a result, died. This fight came to be because Tybalt came up to Romeo demanding a duel for he was at a Capulet ball. Romeo, being married to Tybalt’s in-law tries to avoid the conflict when Tybalt states “Romeo, the love I bear thee can afford No better term than this: thou art a villain” (3.1.61-62)
In the world that we live in today, there are many things that we face daily. Whether it be illness, love or just bad decisions, everybody encounters them and many more. Rash decisions are made on a very common basis among people. A lot of stuff affect the decisions you make. May it be, being too young and not having enough experience to make good decisions, or just the lack of care of the outcome.
In the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet written by William Shakespeare, Romeo is responsible for the way the play unfolds. To begin with Romeo Kills Tybalt When Romeo sees his friend Mercutio slain by Tybalt, he express his anger by declaring “Alive in triumph, and Mercutio slain? Away to heaven respective lenity, And fire-eyed fury be my conduct now! Now, Tybalt, take the ‘villain’ back again That late thou gavest me, for Mercutio’s soul Is but a little way above our heads, Staying for thine to keep him company. Either thou or I, or both, must go with him” (3.1.129-136).
In The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet by Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet’s love both brought people together and tore them apart. Leading Romeo and Juliet to their demise. The patterns and contrasts in language express how good and evil contrast each other and show balance. It emphasizes how in the story, there are good situations and then very bad or dark situations. The motif of good in Romeo and Juliet is developed by the contrasting idea of evil and imagery to convey how similarities and contrast are a part of nature and humanity, without either there would be imbalance in the world.
Tybalt, Juliet’s cousin, started a fight with Mercutio. Romeo tries to stop them, but Tybalt stabbed Mercutio under Romeo’s arm. Romeo hissed, “Now, Tybalt, take the ‘villain’ back again that late thou gavest me; for Mercutio’s soul is but a little way above our heads, staying for thine to keep him company: either thou, or I, or both, must go with him.” [3.1 (46)] Romeo tells Tybalt to take back his insult because Mercutio is dead and waiting for Tybalt’s soul to join him: either Tybalt or Romeo or both of them must die and join Mercutio. Romeo is impulsive because he decides to fight Tybalt without thinking about the consequences of the situation.
Do you believe that love could ever conquer evil? In Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet fall in love but their families are at war, so they kill themselves when they feel the couldn't ever be together. This ends the families feuding. One point of view is that love conquer evil and another is that evil conquers love. I believe that love and evil conquer each other in this dramatic story.
Would you say good conquers evil, or does evil conquer good? In Romeo and Juliet by Shakespeare, the Capulets and Montagues are feuding. Romeo and Juliet fall in love and get married, but since their families are fighting they can’t be together. So Juliet and Romeo kill themselves so they could be together in heaven. The question is does good conquer evil?
In William Shakespeare's play, The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, the concept of good and evil is explored through the characters and their actions. However, upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that nothing is inherently good or evil, but rather it is the perception and context in which it is viewed that determines its moral value. This idea is highlighted through various quotes throughout the play. One example of this is when Friar Laurence says, "Virtue itself turns vice, being misapplied, / And vice sometime by action dignified" (2.3.21-22). Here, the Friar is suggesting that even the most virtuous of actions can become sinful when carried out in the wrong context.
In 1595 the play Romeo and Juliet was written and many people didn't know if the play was going to be good or bad. Back then it wasn't allow for a woman to play women's parts. During this time love and thriller were in and everyone loved it. However, many critics think that Romeo and Juliet could be one of the best poems of all time.
