Rousseau's Social Contract

495 Words2 Pages

Rousseau social contract supports the idea of having an agreement that will give every person the right to obtain a civil society. Upon enter this civil society we are obligated to give certain freedom that limited some of our physical activities. In return will be able to think freely and hopefully make wise decision on what we perceive as morally right. Rousseau hope is that we, as individual will come to the point where will become righteous citizen.
Rousseau does make note that with a social contract there may be concern on what level of freedom we, as a society will have to give up in order to achieve civil society. We are all born free and believe that we are entitled to have the freedom to do what we want to do. No one wants to give total power to any one authority. This absolute ruler will be the person who will be representing everyone as a whole community. Rousseau supports a social contract to ensure that the people will be given protection for their lives and property. The basis of any legitimate authority is to have a social contract that will provide us with …show more content…

He strongly believes that a social contract had no logical purpose. So why would a social contract make individual more obligated to became more socially behaved. Society cannot issue their personal opinion to influence people to behave a certain way. He believe that the government has as enough power in other issues so why do they need to be involved in our personal freedom. He believes that if we have legal enforcement it could lead to people being resisted toward authority. We as adult should already have the knowledge to know the difference between right and wrong. And if we choose to make the wrong decision ultimately it will be that person responsibility to deal with consequences of their behavior. Being a member of civil society we should respect other rights and not violate any ones