ipl-logo

San Antonio Case Study

696 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: 1868 14th amendment equal protection

Citation
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
411 U.S. 1, 93 S. Ct. 1278, 36 L. Ed. 2d 16, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 91
Facts
In 1968, a group of parents and children from San Antonio, Texas filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Texas’s system for funding public schools (Sutton, 2008). The State of Texas provided free primary and secondary education for the children of the State. The state provided a set amount of funding for each district based on the number of students in the district. The local school districts responsibility was to makes up the difference in operating expense with funds from local property taxes. This dependence on property taxes results in a large inequality in per student spending between property …show more content…

While Alamo Heights, the most affluent school district in the San Antonio generated $594 per pupil, which consisted of $225 provided by the state guarantee, $36 in federal funds and $333 of discretionary local-property-tax revenue. Additionally, Edgewood was 90% Hispanic and 6% African-American, while Alamo Heights was predominantly Caucasian, 18% Hispanic and less than 1% African-American (Sutton, 2008).
Issues
Is education a fundamental right for purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment? The lawsuit claimed that under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution that education is a fundamental right. Plaintiffs alleged that this denies the children in poor district Equal Protection of the laws in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Ruling
In a 5-4 decision against, denied. Therefore, the court ruled that education is not a fundamental right under the …show more content…

Therefore, the Supreme Court is saying that in order for a fundamental right to be recognizable under Fourteenth Amendment, it must be defined by the Constitution. Regardless of the fact that a particular role should be executed by the government, does not establish it as fundamental right according to the decision. As referenced by Justice Powell, if it is not written explicitly in the Constitution, it is not a role of the government to guarantee it as a right of the people. The court’s decision that education is not a fundamental right under the United States Constitution refocused local control over school funding formulas. Surprisingly, even though the court’s decision suggests to maintain the status quo; the exact opposite happened. According to Sutton (2008), public outcry became so overwhelming that almost every state changed their funding formula. In essence, while the federal government refused to do anything about the injustice; local state government corrected the issue in accordance with the aim of the Tenth

Show More
Related
427 Words | 2 Pages

San Antonio Independent School District VS Demetrio P Rodriguez was a case in which the supreme court of the United States held that San Antonio Independent School District financing system ,which was based on local property taxes was not an unconstitutional violation of the fourteenth amendment’s equal protection clause. Lawsuit was argued October 12,1972 and decided March 21,1973, the District Court it was brought by members of the Edgewood concerned parent association representing their children .The suit was filed on June 30, 1968 in the federal district court for the Western District of Texas in the initial complaint, the parents sued San Antonio ISD, Alamo Heights ISD and fIve other school districts, the Bexar County School trustees

Read More
312 Words | 2 Pages

(2) Background Information As well as the lawsuit filed by Alton Lemon, this incident involved two other cases that fell under the same issue, Earley v. DiCenso and Robinson v. DisCenso. Both conflicts involved a state law passed, through the Non- public Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1968, by the state of Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. This act gave the government permission to fund religious based or parochial schools. Although the schools provided textbooks and instructional materials for secular subjects, a Pennsylvania instructor believed that this act violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” Lemon argued that that by providing this money

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

The District Court held Central High School accountable for its violation of the 14th Amendment, it stated that

Read More
1170 Words | 5 Pages

Notаbly absent from the opinion, as it was in Plessy, is any citаtion to a Supreme Court cаse that considered whether the prаctice of segregating schools was a violation of the Fourteenth Аmendment. It was an open question for the Court. The Court аdmitted that the precedent to which it cited involved discriminаtion between whites and blacks rаther thаn other rаces. However, the Court found no аppreciable difference here—"the decision is within the discretion of the state in regulating its public schools, and does not conflict with the Fourteenth Аmendment."

Read More
1528 Words | 7 Pages

Savage Inequalities Book Review Savage Inequalities by Jonathan Kozol is an in-depth analysis of America’s public school system and the problems that encompass it. Kozol’s book examines some of the poorest public schools in the United States and attempts to explain how the school or school district plummeted so far into the depths of poverty. Kozol believes that the biggest problem public school faces is segregation, which is still very real in many parts of the United States. Racism and a lackadaisical attitude toward the education of minority groups in America are the roots of the problems that public schools face.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

In the 1950’s schools were segregated by race and Linda Brown thought it was violating the Fourteenth Amendment because they had to be segregated by schools. When both of the schools had similar buildings, transportations,

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

The case made it a law that juveniles had the rights guaranteed to them by the fourteenth

Read More
1522 Words | 7 Pages

Even if a child resides in a non-Cleveland City School District, a parent has enough money to send them to a school in a different district of their choosing. In regards to the larger American society, this ruling implies that although one’s religion and the government play a large role in the lives of society members, they do so independently. America prides itself on the

Read More
626 Words | 3 Pages

“In Texas and California, Mexican Americans were involved in numerous desegregation court battles,” Muñoz reports, “the first was ‘Jesus Salvatierra v. Independent School District’ in Del Rio, Texas in 1930” This was a result of Mexican American students having less resources than their white counterparts.

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

Plaintiff Oliver Brown parent of one of the children (Lynda Brown) was denied entry into the school. Brown brought this up because Brown claimed her rights were violated (The 14th Amendment) because the white school and the school she currently attended were not equal. And no matter what was implied the schools would never be equal. The court dismissed this statement saying the schools were equal in Topeka. Saying the buildings were almost the same and teachers

Read More
1972 Words | 8 Pages

Board of Education is a very important landmark case. This case addressed the constitutionality of segregation in public schools back in the early 1950s. When the case was heard in a U.S. District Court a three-judge panel ruled in favor of the school boards. The plaintiffs then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court went through all its procedures and eventually decided that “Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal” ().

Read More
1393 Words | 6 Pages

“This amendment state that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law” (qtd. in David 45). The defendants, the ones that wanted everything to stay the same, said that the case of Plessy v. Ferguson already rules that separate but equal facilities were constitutionally legal (David 45). They also stated that forcing a state to desegregate was taking away states’ rights and education is a state issue, therefore, states have the right to set segregation rules (“Brown v. Board of

Read More
1464 Words | 6 Pages

Hello Ms. Bahorich, I am a current student at the University of Texas at Arlington and I believe that there is an injustice in the education system in Texas. I believe that the way it’s funded gives a disadvantages to students that attend a school located in a low income neighborhood over schools located in a rich neighborhood. Personally, I admire you for being on the Texas Board of Education as the chairperson, because your job is more than just leading meetings over the Texas education system, giving ideas on how to improve the education system, or make sure that school districts are regulated according to standards. Your job goes beyond that; the future of Texas students is in your hands. Texas education has greatly improved since the beginning

Read More
1361 Words | 6 Pages

Section 1: Lastly, the issue of schools being too focused on getting money for the establishment than focusing on how to better education for the children. Our state spends more time and money focusing on giving students more standardized tests, rather than focusing on a more thorough and more well-rounded curriculum. A submission from a parent’s written in The Texas Tribune, quotes that: “Each year, children graduate from Texas High Schools and they must take REMEDIAL English and Math before moving on to College Level courses! If they were truly being taught in school, these classes would be unnecessary"(Texas Tribune). Children are not sure to be college ready in the most important subjects, by the time they graduate from high school.

Read More
1184 Words | 5 Pages

The federal government may have had good reasoning behind stopping the laws implemented by states, but it doesn’t hide the fact that the federal government overstepped its boundaries. In document 1, it states that education is the important function of state and local governments and it explains how it’s those governments duties to ensure each child has the opportunity to be educated. However, if it’s the state and local governments duty, then why did the federal government decide how each state should handle school systems. It’s no longer about what was the “right thing to do”, but it’s about how the rights of the whites were also contracted as they lost their say in what goes on in their own

Read More

More about San Antonio Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document