ipl-logo

Science Vs Religion Research Paper

809 Words4 Pages

Julie McCarthy
Mr. Corso
Astronomy
15 December 2017
Science vs Religion Science and Religion have contradicted for years. Many say that they are not similar in any way. Science is the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. While religion is the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods. Even though many people believe Science and Religion differ, I believe that they both help each other in basic observations, the universe, and research. Science and Religion are things people have learned about for over 1,000 years. Over those years people have said …show more content…

The Big Bang is a theory on how the universe started and then made the groups of stars that we see today. At the beginning the universe was very hot, small, and dense with no stars, atoms, form, or structure. Many scientists say that the universe was created by the big bang but many others believe God created the universe. It is mentioned in the Bible of how God created the universe in 7 days. Religion says that one day when Jesus comes back the world will end but Scientists believe that years from now, molecules in our universe will cease to move in a Big Freeze that will bring an end to everything. I believe that the universe was created by the Big Bang and here is why. Even though, I should believe God created the universe I think that it would have taken more than a week to be created. The universe is so large that we do not know how big it is. Scientists say it took almost 15 billion years to create our universe and I think that the universe is still growing, and being …show more content…

He speaks out against Atheist Professor Richard Dawkins who chastises Religion for thwarting scientific research. Lambert believes not only does the Catholic faith, when correctly applied, not hinder science, but gives it vital intelligibility, meaning, and purpose. In the article he explains his reasonings to why he believes faith does not hinder science. Lambert believes that the Christian faith can shed some light on scientific findings. he says you can discover and receive intelligibility with science and religion. He also says science can provide answers to fundamental questions. When speaking of scientific research coming to life, Lambert says that faith gives a sense of your scientific practice and action. He says faith gives a nice impulse and realization that all of this world has a deep meaning to be discovered. On the other hand, Atheists believe that the world was created by the Big Bang. Since they do not believe in God or any higher power it is reasonable they believe the world was not created by

Show More
Related
1059 Words | 5 Pages

For centuries, religion and faith—Christianity, in particular—consistently clashed with scientific ideas and theories. The controversy and debate, beginning from the Middle Ages, ranged from issues about the position of the Earth in the solar system, to the practice of medicine. Still, creationism and evolution, sparked immense disagreement amongst the religious and scientific communities, in comparison to any other issue. While major systems of faith strongly declare that their respective God created the universe and the earth, scientists such as Charles Darwin and George Lemaitre proposed theories of evolution and the Big Bang. Unable to come to a consensus, religion and science often do not associate with each other.

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

An Expected Expository Essay Little do you know how phenomenal storyboards are put together. They’re many books to read in the world, and it’s impossible to read them all. Although, there may be one or two that catch people's attention. The Hobbit is a great book to read.

Read More
2250 Words | 9 Pages

It is important that we accept that religion is Man’s attempt to answer these questions and because it is an institution reliant upon faith, it is acceptable for one to accept Religion as a precursor for complex ideas, and interpret its fallacies as misunderstandings, however, it is unreasonable for one to justify the rejection of science to prevent controversy with the beliefs of religion. Furthermore, it is unreasonable for one to ever justify the rejection of science for any reason, as this praxis clouds the mind and decreases one’s capacity to comprehend the true nature of the universe and the governing laws to which it

Read More
2665 Words | 11 Pages

Additionally, it would turn religious individuals away from theories of science such as evolution. In response, Harris argues that “the goal is to get them [religious individuals] to value the principles of reasoning and educated discourse that now make a belief in evolution obligatory” (Harris). Instead of convincing the religious community to acknowledge the truth behind scientific theories, religious individuals should be able to understand why they are true. In Harris's opinion, understanding the reason behind ideas like evolution and valuing the education they can offer is more important than settling for the religious community to simply tolerate scientific theories. Having religious communities learn to value the reasoning and logic behind science could bring the two communities closer

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

Young earth creationists believe that God created the universe in six literal 24-hour days. These six literal days are shown to the human race as read from

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

As a result, many scientists with a religious faith believe that God is responsible in creating the world. This article mentions that scientific people disagree with Darwin’s theory of evolution, whereas the third ancillary text, “Religious Groups’ Views on Evolution” mentions that Buddhists have no conflict between their religious teaching and evolutionary theory. They believe in some aspects of Darwin’s theory such as “the notion that all life is impermanent.” 6. What work remains to be done?

Read More
2359 Words | 10 Pages

Following same things as Christian scientists Compare Christian and Secular Scientists views Combine the information Compare the factors Examples

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

The issue on whether religion and science can work together has been debatable for centuries. Neil DeGrasse Tyson in his article the Perimeter of Ignorance argues that science and religion cannot coexist. In his article, the author explains that religion is all about the Bible and the Bible primarily focuses on the explanation of the origin of the world. He puts forth the point that this concept is far different from what science is and that they do not complement each other. This essay intends to prove that religion and science can work together with no issues.

Read More
925 Words | 4 Pages

Science wants you to understand what it means to be a human being without reference to God. Christians believe that in entering human life God was there from the beginning. We know who we are through knowing God. Just like all other life we are born, eat, sleep, and struggle to survival.

Read More
194 Words | 1 Pages

Most people in today’s society confuse that there must be a cutthroat decision whether they should believe in science or religion. Since the time of classical antiquity many theologians, writers, and philosophers have attempted to find the bridge between science and religion. Science, which is similar to philosophy, acknowledges reason and substantiation while theology acknowledges faith and revelation. The novel Worship and Cosmology discusses the responses between new sciences and the Christian faith. Catherine Vincie dissects multiple branches of science ranging from many topics and how is coincides with systematic and sacramental theology.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

Scientists, however, believe that advanced education will eventually deny the belief in faith. The rejection of faith by evolutionists is based on the interpretation of creationism as a scientific theory where faith cannot act on the basis of reason. However, many scientists, including Dr. Collins, have always claimed that their faith was supported by reason but with the added element of revelation. His belief in faith does not compromise his scientific work, as can be seen from the awards that he has collected. Furthermore, creationism should be defined as religion where God becomes necessity in one's spiritual realm.

Read More
296 Words | 2 Pages

If one were to ask most secular people today the question of how biblical Christianity and science reconcile, most would say that the two are in total conflict. This is largely due to the popular media portrayal of Christianity, being associated with radical young-Earth creationists, against science, being associated with scientist celebrities. Televised debates create a dichotomy between science and creationism, and even though many creationist hold science to be supportive of their worldview, most people observe this situation as having a single, competitive answer that either affirms science or biblical Christianity. Two of the hottest topics surrounding the community of this model are evolution and creation. The hottest mouths on the

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

For instance, religion wonders about the meaning and purpose of life, whereas science studies the causes and the proper functioning of the world. The main conflict arises when one of them plays to be the other. It is well known that many scientists have developed some theories about life and its aims, a field that belongs to religion. They should accept its limitations and, most importantly, learn from each other. Many institutions, both scientific and religious, seek a harmony and are willing to collaborate in order to create a community where religion is compatible with science and modern discoveries are taken seriously.

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

While there is a discrepancy, in regards to the timeline, the ideas present is still the same. This further supports that God created this instance because scientists are unable to conclude what the cause of the Big Bang was because after a particular time before the implosion occurred, the laws of physics can no longer be applied due to the intense heat. By this, it can be supported that God was the proponent that started the Big

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

But based on your religion and beliefs may reflect on whether you may think science and religion contradict or believe in one more than the other. Your religion is may very from where you come from in the world and how your religion perceives on life. Maybe cause of the way you grew up as a child may contradict of you believing in religion and science more. Plus religion is way older than science if you really think about it. It has been past down from generation to generation.

Read More

More about Science Vs Religion Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document