ipl-logo

Second Bank Of America Essay

1350 Words6 Pages

The Second Bank of the United States, constructed in the early 19th century in Philadelphia, stands as a cornerstone of American financial history. The initial function of the building was to serve as a financial institution, responsible for regulating the country’s monetary system, overseeing banking operations, and issuing currency. The building was designed by architect William Strickland, who drew inspiration from the grandeur of Greek architectural style, particularly the Athenian Parthenon, and infused the Second Bank with elements that would come to define the Greek Revival movement in America. The Second Bank of the United States reflects many aspects of the Doric order, as described by Vitruvius, Summerson, and Russell; however, it …show more content…

Situated within a period of rapid urbanization, economic expansion, and cultural evolution in America, the bank's architectural choices embody the zeitgeist of the era, at the intersection of historical context, cultural aspirations, and architectural innovation. Designed by architect William Strickland, a prominent figure in the neoclassical movement, the building's adoption of Greek architectural style symbolizes a cultural fascination with classical antiquity and a desire to emulate the democratic ideals of ancient Greece. Strickland's meticulous adherence to neoclassical principles, evident in the building's Doric order, column designs, and proportions, reflects a deliberate effort to evoke the grandeur and sophistication of ancient Greek architecture while also adapting it to the needs of a modern financial institution. Summerson aptly describes the neoclassical movement as "a vehicle for the expression of national identity and aspirations” (Summerson, page? …show more content…

From its inception as a bastion of financial regulation and currency issuance to its embodiment of Greek Revival architecture, the bank encapsulates the spirit of its era. Designed by architect William Strickland, the building marries classical Doric elements with contemporary neoclassical influences, reflecting both reverence for antiquity and adaptation to modern needs. The reflection of the Doric order resonates throughout the bank's structure, from its column designs to the placement of triglyphs and metopes. These architectural features, while adhering to ancient ideals, also reveal the challenges faced by architects in maintaining symmetry and harmony. Yet, alongside these classical elements, the Second Bank embraces modern innovations, such as glass-paneled windows and engaged columns, reflecting the practical requirements of its time. Situated within a period of rapid urbanization and cultural evolution, the Second Bank's architectural choices embody the zeitgeist of the era, expressing national aspirations and cultural

Open Document