ipl-logo

Should Brutus Have Killed Caesar?

488 Words2 Pages

Should Brutus have killed Caesar? Julius caesar was strong and powerful, but he did not have the power or strength to fight his friends and followers. In the play, Julius Caesar, Brutus should have killed Caesar, Caesar was an untrustworthy politician and his judgment was clouded with ambitons that only benefitted himself. Caesar was an untrustworthy politician and leader and did questionable things to gain power. Caesar took the place of general Pompey after he left to control roman forces and Caesar achieved the title Pontifex Maximus allegedly through heavy bribery. Caesar formed the first triumvirate with Pompey and Marcus Licinius Crassus. “His successes also aroused Pompey’s jealousy, leading to the collapse of their political alliance in 53 B.C.”(History.com Editors) .After caesar defeated pompey, he consolidated his power in rome by instating ambitious reforms such as the julian calendar and the land reforms. Caesar was a ruler who only thought about himself and was not trustworthy because he took bribes and betrayed the people that he worked with. …show more content…

Caesar had an insatiable drive for power and would do anything to gain that power, such as bribes and lying. Caesar gains power and the eyes of rome after he conquers Pompey and his judgement was clouded by all of the power he achieved, Cassius even says “And this man is now become a god.” (1,2,117-118) and caesars attitude changes towards the people as he gets accustomed to the power that he has obtained. In the beginning he is understanding and listens to the people but as time goes on he ignores the Conspirators when they try to ask for publius cimber to be granted permission to return. This shows that caesar is selfish and was clouded by his power over

Show More
Related
1540 Words | 7 Pages

Since he became ruled by his vices that gained him power prestige his reputation grew for the honor to fear which led the Egyptians to decide death because "Dead men don't bite" (Pompey, 77). Julius Caesar was controlled by pride and greed just like Pompey and had the virtue of humanity also. But unlike Pompey, Caesar was a man who never shied away from praise and popularity. Caesar's humility at first was nothing but a ploy to make the Roman citizens like him, because of

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

From these invasions he acquired the riches to support his military. He would become the governor of Gaul and would inform the people of his military achievements as would become a notorious military strategist. Crassus and Pompey were the main keys to Caesar obtaining power because money was one of the most important factors to being a successful politician or general during the time. Having wealth allowed him to become one of the most important politicians in Rome, increased his popularity throughout all parts of Roman society, and paved the way for him to bribe senators or soldiers into doing his bidding. Throughout Caesar’s quest to becoming the absolute ruler of Rome the Senate and Pompey were the main rivals that tried to hinder him.

Read More
936 Words | 4 Pages

Caesar was a young aristocrat that excelled and offered his political abilities to help Pompey and Crassus. He basically worked as a tool for his two more powerful partners. Crassus was killed while fighting the Parthians in Mesopotamia. Pompey made sure he stayed away from Caesar. Pompey was killed in

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

Caesar put the business of Rome for the people in front of personal matters. Caesar was killed when he prioritized Rome over personal business. The reasons for their deaths

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

The mention of the name “Julius Caesar” evokes a variety of different images in people’s minds. Some would think “dictator,” others, “leader” or “influential,” and even so, among others, “an arrogant asshole.” Whatever the world’s opinion of Caesar, it is an indisputable fact that he completely transformed the Roman Republic into a strong Roman Empire. Caesar has a rather lengthy track record for positions held in the political sphere, thus making him the epitome of what one would define as a political success. The leading contributing factor in this success was the crucial political alliances he formed.

Read More
419 Words | 2 Pages

Caesar came to power through corruption, which spilled into the government of Rome. Along with his hero title, he used bribery, beatings, and even assassination to gain power. With the growing conquered land meant increasing population. The people's demands left political problems which

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar was a political and military leader whose reign marked the beginning of the Roman Empire and the end of the Roman Republic. Caesar did not always follow the law to get the power that he obtained. Caesar once stated, “If you must break the law, do it to seize power; in all other cases, observe it.” If Caesar saw a way to get power, he took the opportunity even if it meant breaching the law.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Caesar had by now even eclipsed Pompey. However, the Senate wanted to strip him of his army and to prosecute him” (How did Julius Caesar's rise to power?). He used his military power to crush the Gauls and Britons and then used the finances from plundering to buy out the people in the senate, effectively making him the senate. Caesar could also wield his power effectively through political marriages or just bribing senators to support him. Caesar was a force to be reckoned with in the political scene of

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

Keep Power or Kill If you believed that the only way to save your state was to kill one of your friends, would you? The character Brutus killed one of his friends in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar(JC) by William Shakespeare. Some people believe that he is a villain and only killed Caesar to keep his own power in the government. However many people think that he killed Julius Caesar to help prevent Rome from becoming dictatorship.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout history, people have sought power and control. In the play Julius Caesar, Caesar is often portrayed as a power-hungry dictator who led the Roman Republic to its downfall. However, this portrayal is unfair and overlooks the many qualities that made Caesar a great leader. Caesar was a skilled military strategist, charismatic speaker, and a visionary person who brought what was needed to form Rome. His drive for power was not motivated by selfish ambition but by a desire to stabilize and strengthen the Roman Republic.

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

When Brutus spoke about his motives to kill Caesar he said, “As he was valiant I / honor him. But, as he was ambitious, I slew him.” (3.2.27-28). Brutus honored Caesar but saw that his ambition has the potential of being very dangerous. He thought that a danger like Caesar could not be left to grow more powerful when there is a solution to the issue now.

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

Do you think Julius Caesar was a decent, cherished leader, or a tyrant, hatred one? Caesar was a standout amongst the most celebrated leaders of all circumstances. He was one of Rome 's most prominent and all the more intense pioneers. His progressions to the realm helped take Rome higher than ever of achievement. The life of Caesar was short, yet incredible.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar was the Dictator of Rome in 42 BC who accomplished many things. Many people believed that he was a hero, but Julius Caesar was a very ambitious dictator and was more of a villain than a hero. Julius Caesar was a villain because he didn’t think first before doing something, he forced the Senate to name him dictator for life and he also was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. To begin with, Julius Caesar was a was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. Caesar used his power as dictator more towards his advantage instead of helping the people in Rome.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Is it justified to kill someone because they have gained too much power and are going to use it for the worse? Brutus has a very bad circumstance on his hands, he can kill Caesar and possibly be executed for his actions or he can let Caesar become king and watch Rome fall. There are many reasons why Brutus should and should not join the conspiracy. Brutus says, “I know no personal reason to spurn at him But for the general.” (II,i,11).

Read More

More about Should Brutus Have Killed Caesar?

Related Topics

Open Document