Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
On financial compensation for college athletes
On financial compensation for college athletes
On financial compensation for college athletes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: On financial compensation for college athletes
Sports reporter, Kate Murphy, succinctly summarizes an overwhelming standpoint that many people seem to cite in her article "Privilege, not a job: College athletes shouldn 't be paid. " First, she stipulates herself that student-athletes technically fit the criteria of hardworking employees. She also acknowledges that it is nearly impossible for athletes to balance a job while adhering to their strict schedules. However, because student-athletes are "living the dream" and are supposed to drink up the passion and sacrifices of their game, seeking compensation is grotesque and un-sportsman like. This argument rides on the coattails of "purity."
The only difference between the programs is people like to watch football and basketball more, so it brings in more money. If all athletes cannot be paid, no athletes should be paid. Athletes are already paid by being given a scholarship. Not having to pay for a college education is something many people dream of. Most colleges provide their athletes clothes, meals, textbooks, and even tutoring.
College athletes should get paid to pay because they dedicate a lot of time to their teams, they do not have time for a job, the school receives a great amount of money from the games that they perform in, and a salary would help student-athletes learn how to
Every American has heard the words “student debt.” While looking at schools, people see different things about them, including the price and location. Depending on the school depends on the price. While attending a costly school, many times, scholarships are used to help offset costs; some people even get jobs. But having scholarships while playing sports makes a significant difference.
The NCAA has made a profit on the careers of young college athletes across all sports for decades, with players being forbidden from earning money based on their name image and likeness up until 2 years ago. The NCAA needs to continue to allow college athletes to earn money based on their name image and likeness and it is the right thing to do based on recruiting strategies by coaches, players’ commitment to the sport, as well as the players’ background. The NCAA needs to continue to allow college athletes to earn money based on their name, image, and likeness, and it is the right thing to do based on recruiting strategies by coaches. New Colorado football head coach Deion Sanders recently said during an interview when asked about scouting defensive lineman “Defensive linemen, it’s totally opposite — single mama, trying to get it, he’s on free lunch…. I’m talking about just trying to make it.
College students should be getting money in these ways but they don’t always get it. Endorsements will help college students get money for participating in a sport. Johnny Manziel's jersey sells for $60 dollars in the Texas A&M pro shop but he doesn’t get anything himself. The college gets money off its own player’s money but they don’t get a single thing for putting their name on a sale. Many will say that they get scholarships but don’t match the fantasy of getting endorsements.
Should college athletes be paid? I think they should. I found three main reason why other people and myself think that college athletes deserve pay. One, you can just pay the sports that produce the most revenue. Two, these student athletes put in lots of work and even sometimes have to miss class to go to the sports event.
Statistically showing, at least 100,000 college football players get hurt yearly. College football player’s should get paid to play because these players put themselves at risk for injury, college football is a job, not p.e, and it will help players adjust to college socially and economically. Colleges and the NCAA can make money selling jerseys and other souvenirs that might include the likeness of players, yet the actual players never receive a cent. Every time a football player steps onto the field, they’re risking themselves for injury.
One reason high schoolers should be paid for name, image, and likeness contracts is that they can pay for expenses that normal athletes can't afford. Most athletes will not make it very far into a professional league, but the money they can earn from NIL contracts could help them a lot. A lot of these athletes won’t be able to make it into a professional league and wouldn’t mind “a full or partial scholarship that covers tuition and education expenses” as a way to pay for these activities (Should College Athletes Be Paid? Reasons Why or Why Not). This means that even though most of these athletes will make it far enough into a professional league, the money will help them with paying for school and other expenses.
College Kids Should Get Paid For Athletics College Athletics…Should kids get paid for all their hard work? Do you think they should get paid for their commitment and efforts. I do. I think they should get some money for their promotion to the school.
Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.
The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.
College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.
College students should get paid.support their families. First,players may stay longer.giving them what they deserve right. Second,they should get what deserve not they need. Second,they should get what deserve not they need. Support their families.¨Players would be able to actually afford a decent meal and possibly send some money back home.¨First, they need to support their family in many different ways.¨Many of these athletes come from urban.¨Second, many athletes come from different country/states.¨low-class families and often leave school early because of the unimaginable pressure to be the main provider for their family at a young age.¨Third, low -class families and often leave school early because the athletes don't get paid.
So being paid to play is ridiculous because they are already getting a free education. And without the football education would be useless in their future because most do not care about school. this is because the student who plays football will most likely become a professional. Another kind of controversy is that some athletes are put on “exceptional admits” which allows athletes into the University without having