Should Creationism And Intelligent Design Be Taught In Public Schools Essay

Creationism and intelligent design shouldn’t be taught in public schools because there is just too much evidence against it and not enough for it. Some may think, “Why not just teach both or neither?” The answer is that we should only teach one: evolution. There is a reason that creationism and intelligent design are “beliefs”; one can believe in them, but that doesn’t make them anywhere near true. It would be perfectly acceptable to take a class on learning about the different beliefs and religions out there, but the teaching of the religion itself should be kept in the church/mosque/any building used for religious reasons. First of all, science is defined as knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method1. While evolution fits this description, almost no religions do. Evolution has been tested, experimented with, and nearly proven to be the only way possible, along with

You would not be able to rightly teach religion in a science classroom because it does not fit the description of (as seen above) science. As shown as a way to teach evolution to those who don’t believe in it, one could use the method of relating dinosaurs to modern-day creatures2. As said, one idea is that the Archaeopteryx(a small feathered bird-like dinosaur3) could be the parental genus of modern-day birds. This theory has been widely accepted for a long time, as multiple other fossils have been found in various forms of the Archaeopteryx and creatures like it that suggest an even stronger link between the creature and the birds of today. If you were to teach Christianity or other religions in science, you would have to be able to prove that it is science. There is little evidence of any religion being able to be classified as science, much less the