Sociological Theory

Quite a bit of what we think about society, relationships, and social conduct has developed because of different human science theories. Students of sociology ordinarily invest a lot of energy and time, examining these distinctive theories. A few theories are not in favor because of lack of support, while others remain broadly acknowledged, yet all have contributed hugely to our comprehension of society, connections, and social conduct. By adapting more about these theories, you can pick up a more profound and wealthier comprehension of human science's past, present, and future. These sociological theories give researchers a lens through which to see the social world, and the analytic scaffolding to describe it and maybe even ways to change

Right from the moment we are born till we die, we are perceived by different people differently. The way we are treated by others is totally dependent how they think we are. For example: A child with comparatively higher level of IQ will definitely be treated differently as compared to a normal level child. The Looking-Glass Self starts at an early age, proceeding all through the aggregate of one's life as one will modify constantly their self unless every single social association are stopped.
There have been social experiments in past to justify the existence of the theory of Looking-Glass. One of the experiment involves a person standing right in front six different mirrors placed at different angles. The image that he perceives from all the varied angles involved a different image which actually certifies the fact that a person can have more than one image in the public. It is the representation of what he wants to be in front of

As per Durkheim’s ‘In the Elementary of Religious Life’, these representations are a derivation of intense religious ritual and are richer than individual constructs. An excellent example, would be the Christian Cross. It acts as a symbol, representing certain constructs to followers of the religion it represents i.e. Christianity, but to an individual may or may not offer a social meaning. It is only when these symbols are projected as objects of representation do they gather relevance and authority.
Another example, related to religion, would be items of religious value. Let us, for the purpose of this assignment compare and contrast Gangajal and tap water. Both are basically water, with no observable sensory differences. However, the former occupies a place of respect and adoration which is not showered upon the other. Collective Representation explains this by virtue of qualities assigned to it, at a societal level, as a function of religious