The imperial governments of Han China and Rome after Augustus each had their own distinct characteristics, shaped by their own unique histories and the cultural and social norms of their respective times. The institutions of imperial government developed in each state were quite different from one another, with the Han Chinese government relying heavily on Confucian ideals, while the Roman government was more focused on practicality and efficiency. In order to understand why these differences exist, one must look at the historical, cultural, and religious contexts of both societies.
In Han China, Confucianism was the dominant philosophy and its influence shaped the institutions of the imperial government. Confucianism placed a strong emphasis on the virtue of a ruler, emphasizing that the emperor should be wise, virtuous, and just, while also displaying filial piety towards his subjects. This translated into a government in which the emperor was the central figure and all decisions were made in his name. Moreover, the emperor was expected to select talented ministers and advisors who could help him lead the country. This system of government was heavily reliant upon the emperor’s personal qualities and his ability to choose good ministers.
…show more content…
Augustus adopted a more pragmatic approach to government, creating a system of bureaucracy that was designed to maximize efficiency and reduce costs. This system was based on the idea of an imperial bureaucracy in which the emperor was the ultimate authority, but he delegated the day-to-day operations of government to his appointed officials. This allowed for a more efficient form of government and allowed the emperor to focus on other tasks, such as waging wars and expanding the