ipl-logo

Similarities Between Han China And India

480 Words2 Pages

Between 300 B.C.E. and 200B.C.E, two empires in China and India formed. The Hand Dynasty by an original ruler, Liu Band and the Mauryan Empire founded by Chandragupta Maurya. The early Han Dynasty and Mauryan Empire both used conquest for expansion and ministered political policies; however, declined separately caused by the invasion of Han and financial collapse of Mauryan. To enlarge their empire, both China and India used subjection. In 141B.C.E, Han Wudi, the “martial emperor”, pursed imperial expansion. To do so, Wudi invaded central Asia with his armies. He proceeded to bring Xiongnu Empire under the control of the Han Dynasty, causing the fall of that particular empire. By bringing these empires under one ruling, the dynasty was allowed expansion in China. To amplify the Mauryan empire, Chandragupta Maurya used a similar strategy in 300 B.C.E. Chandra seized the control of small regions in Magadha. This included the conquest of regimes including Punjab. By 400 B.C.E the empire of Mauryan included all of India allowing the empire to progress in organization. …show more content…

Early Han emperors controlled using designs of Legalist principles. This meant that they ran government by strict laws and punishments. This was effective by ensuring order in China. To spread these principles, Wudi sent officers to implement these in the various districts of the country, resulting in a unified government. Similar, Ashoka of Mauryan Empire applied unified government as well. Ashoka Mauryan developed all methods for their empire at the capital of Pataliputa. Here, central treasuries oversaw local taxes. To spread this guideline to the remaining areas of china, Ashoka inscribed them on stone pillars to send throughout the realm. Ultimately, this created an administrative bureaucratic system for both China and

Show More
Related
758 Words | 4 Pages

Have you ever heard of the ancient ruler that unified most of modern-day India? In 268 B.C.E Asoka first took leadership of the Mauryan Empire. Not too long after that, Asoka invaded Kalinga in 261 BCE. 200,000 Kalingans died as a result of his conquest. Events throughout Asoka's life portrayed him as a villain.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

Consequently, it made civilians afraid to disobey the law in fear of severe punishment(s). With the empire divided into administrative districts governed by officials it creates an effective control on the people. Additionally, it keeps the emperor informed, allowing him to destroy any possibilities that would form into rebellion or factions in the government. Even with this method of political control, people still revolted against authorities. On the other hand the Mauryan and Gupta empires relied primarily on religion to suppress any intentions on uprisings which, worked phenomenally.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

The rise of the Aztec Empire (1150-1521) and Mongol Empire (1206-1368) affected their surrounding regions significantly. Through the invasions by these Empires, the areas they inhabited were conquered and reestablished as their own. The Aztecs and Mongols were similar in many ways including their mutual desire to gain power and land. Although these empires resemble each other in the way they acquired land, they vary in terms of their religion and reasons for engineering advances. Both empires established advances in engineering but, because of their environments, these advances were created differently to benefit themselves.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

Empires throughout history have all had their own methods to political control. Some very similar others could not be any more different. Some of the great empires such as the Han and the Roman had very similar approaches to political control. Although both the Han and the Roman empires had similar forms of government both bureaucracies, both empires had many individual characteristics as well.

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the history of The Roman Empire the government has changed elected consuls to powerful emperors with intent to overall better the empire. Comparatively, China’s empire was constantly adjusted from a simpler bureaucracy to a censorate appointed to provinces, which lead it to be argued as the most unified empire. Rome and China attempted to unify their empires both similarly and very differently because of the different structures of their governments and the culture flowing through the empires. The Roman and Chinese had similar ideas of having a bureaucratic based government to centralize the people under the rule of the emperor like the censorate in China and senate in Rome. On the contrary, those political structures were both

Read More
307 Words | 2 Pages

During this time of strength, the Huns attempted to conquer the northern portion of India like they had most of the Roman empire. Because of their strength, the Indian army

Read More
1296 Words | 6 Pages

The early modern era was a time when empires thrived across the globe. The Western Europeans were not the only ones to construct successful empires either. The Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman empires added to this phenomenon. Although these empires share many similarities, they also have their differences. During the time, 1450 CE -1750 CE, European empires in the Americas and their Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman counterparts are similar in that they all thrived and united diverse peoples and different in that European empires developed something entirely new, an interacting Atlantic World, while the other empires continued older patterns of historical development.

Read More
1525 Words | 7 Pages

The Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire shared many similarities and differences when it came to political rule and the nature of their political authority. The most significant difference between the two is how the Han dynasty enacted policies that were shaped to counter the wrongdoings of the previous Qin dynasty, whereas the Roman Empire enacted policies shaped to create and promote peace and stability. The difference in the two empire’s coming to power was to account for their variance in political rule. After the Qin dynasty, the Han ruled China for four centuries, enacting numerous political changes and governing one of the most efficacious dynasties in Chinese history.

Read More
376 Words | 2 Pages

Women are Jewels. They should be loved and protected. They are the mothers, the ones who give us life. They should be treated as equals, and that is not achieved through enslaving them. It is achieved through seeing them as another person, through seeing them as a whole person and not just as a lower gender.

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

The Gunpowder Empires. More specifically, the Muslim Gunpowder Empires: Ottoman, Mughal, and Safavid. All three existed during roughly the same time period, from 1500-1800 (though there is an exception with the Ottoman Empire); and they all existed around the same place in the world. They all used gunpowder for war and expansion. They were all predominantly Muslim, or at least ruled by such.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

This kept the people of China from ever considering to standing up to their ruler. Whereas the people of India were able to live more lenient lives. Until the death of the ruler Qin it remained this way. The next dynasty was The Glorious Han Dynasty. The ruler of this dynasty was of peasant origin and was not as harsh as his predecessor.

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

Two men, both similar and different, each had a unique governing style. From a time of chaotic strive within their nations; each had a way to subside such conflict. In the Classical Age, Ashoka and Shi Huangdi had similar governing styles, in that they had a similar political and economic vision of success for their empire; however differed in philosophies that influenced their governing styles because Ashoka eventually renounced his brutality and became a peaceful and tolerant ruler. Through-out each man’s rule, walls stretching the length of an empire and towers of stone were built, but the means by which they were created varied greatly. Under Ashoka and Shi Huangdi’s rule extensive building projects were carried out.

Read More
1233 Words | 5 Pages

China, up until the Qin Dynasty, consisted of independent states controlled by kings fighting each other for land and power. This time period was called The Era of Warring States, which lasted two hundred years. After this time, the Qin Dynasty rose to power. They conquered all other dynasties, and established a centralized government, unifying China for the first time. The dynasty that succeeded the Qin, the Han, continued the centralized government and they started a westward expansion that would encourage trade and cultural diffusion.

Read More
259 Words | 2 Pages

The Mauryan Empire gained legitimacy by the use of chandragupta’s soft power. He allowed

Read More

More about Similarities Between Han China And India

Related Topics

Open Document