Between 300 B.C.E. and 200B.C.E, two empires in China and India formed. The Hand Dynasty by an original ruler, Liu Band and the Mauryan Empire founded by Chandragupta Maurya. The early Han Dynasty and Mauryan Empire both used conquest for expansion and ministered political policies; however, declined separately caused by the invasion of Han and financial collapse of Mauryan. To enlarge their empire, both China and India used subjection. In 141B.C.E, Han Wudi, the “martial emperor”, pursed imperial expansion. To do so, Wudi invaded central Asia with his armies. He proceeded to bring Xiongnu Empire under the control of the Han Dynasty, causing the fall of that particular empire. By bringing these empires under one ruling, the dynasty was allowed expansion in China. To amplify the Mauryan empire, Chandragupta Maurya used a similar strategy in 300 B.C.E. Chandra seized the control of small regions in Magadha. This included the conquest of regimes including Punjab. By 400 B.C.E the empire of Mauryan included all of India allowing the empire to progress in organization. …show more content…
Early Han emperors controlled using designs of Legalist principles. This meant that they ran government by strict laws and punishments. This was effective by ensuring order in China. To spread these principles, Wudi sent officers to implement these in the various districts of the country, resulting in a unified government. Similar, Ashoka of Mauryan Empire applied unified government as well. Ashoka Mauryan developed all methods for their empire at the capital of Pataliputa. Here, central treasuries oversaw local taxes. To spread this guideline to the remaining areas of china, Ashoka inscribed them on stone pillars to send throughout the realm. Ultimately, this created an administrative bureaucratic system for both China and