ipl-logo

Similarities Between Han China And India

480 Words2 Pages

Between 300 B.C.E. and 200B.C.E, two empires in China and India formed. The Hand Dynasty by an original ruler, Liu Band and the Mauryan Empire founded by Chandragupta Maurya. The early Han Dynasty and Mauryan Empire both used conquest for expansion and ministered political policies; however, declined separately caused by the invasion of Han and financial collapse of Mauryan. To enlarge their empire, both China and India used subjection. In 141B.C.E, Han Wudi, the “martial emperor”, pursed imperial expansion. To do so, Wudi invaded central Asia with his armies. He proceeded to bring Xiongnu Empire under the control of the Han Dynasty, causing the fall of that particular empire. By bringing these empires under one ruling, the dynasty was allowed expansion in China. To amplify the Mauryan empire, Chandragupta Maurya used a similar strategy in 300 B.C.E. Chandra seized the control of small regions in Magadha. This included the conquest of regimes including Punjab. By 400 B.C.E the empire of Mauryan included all of India allowing the empire to progress in organization. …show more content…

Early Han emperors controlled using designs of Legalist principles. This meant that they ran government by strict laws and punishments. This was effective by ensuring order in China. To spread these principles, Wudi sent officers to implement these in the various districts of the country, resulting in a unified government. Similar, Ashoka of Mauryan Empire applied unified government as well. Ashoka Mauryan developed all methods for their empire at the capital of Pataliputa. Here, central treasuries oversaw local taxes. To spread this guideline to the remaining areas of china, Ashoka inscribed them on stone pillars to send throughout the realm. Ultimately, this created an administrative bureaucratic system for both China and

Show More
Related

Asoka Dbq Essay

758 Words | 4 Pages

Have you ever heard of the ancient ruler that unified most of modern-day India? In 268 B.C.E Asoka first took leadership of the Mauryan Empire. Not too long after that, Asoka invaded Kalinga in 261 BCE. 200,000 Kalingans died as a result of his conquest. Events throughout Asoka's life portrayed him as a villain.

Read More

Similarities Between Han China And Mauryan India

797 Words | 4 Pages

The Han Dynasty is predominantly concerned with laws and education when trying to regulate their citizens. They use Legalist and Confucius teachings as a baseline for how they rule. Furthermore, emperor Han Wudi created the Confucian Education System to teach future government officials discipline and loyalty to elders, especially the emperor. This lowered the chance that bureaucrats would betray them. While men doing government services were disciplined, the government used strict laws and their military to maintain order in the community.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Mongols And Aztec Empires

928 Words | 4 Pages

The rise of the Aztec Empire (1150-1521) and Mongol Empire (1206-1368) affected their surrounding regions significantly. Through the invasions by these Empires, the areas they inhabited were conquered and reestablished as their own. The Aztecs and Mongols were similar in many ways including their mutual desire to gain power and land. Although these empires resemble each other in the way they acquired land, they vary in terms of their religion and reasons for engineering advances. Both empires established advances in engineering but, because of their environments, these advances were created differently to benefit themselves.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Fall Of The Han And Roman Empires

581 Words | 3 Pages

During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Roman And Han Empires

564 Words | 3 Pages

This showed the citizen that they had some control and created a strong government following in the people and helped eliminate the chance of uprisings. The han however had no citizen participation in their government their emperor held all the power in government. A main way to maintain control in this system was using harsh and excessive punishment.

Read More

Why Did Rome And China Attempt To Unify Their Empires

787 Words | 4 Pages

For example, the Han Dynasty had an censorate group of officials who controlled the militia and carried out the law of the emperor to ensure it was the same for all of China this made the people share the amount rights they got, therefore joined them together. Similarly, the Han Dynasty had bureaucracy which mainly had them enforce Confucianism to unify the people. A similar political structure occurred in the Mediterranean in the Roman Empire. During the Pax Romana, a group of male officials called the Senate appointed governors to each province, which made it easier for the emperor to directly rule. This in turn made the citizens unite because it made the system of court more just.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Qin Dynasty And Han Dynasty

1233 Words | 5 Pages

China, up until the Qin Dynasty, consisted of independent states controlled by kings fighting each other for land and power. This time period was called The Era of Warring States, which lasted two hundred years. After this time, the Qin Dynasty rose to power. They conquered all other dynasties, and established a centralized government, unifying China for the first time. The dynasty that succeeded the Qin, the Han, continued the centralized government and they started a westward expansion that would encourage trade and cultural diffusion.

Read More

Chandragupta Byzantine Empire

307 Words | 2 Pages

During this time of strength, the Huns attempted to conquer the northern portion of India like they had most of the Roman empire. Because of their strength, the Indian army

Read More

Compare And Contrast European Empires

1296 Words | 6 Pages

The early modern era was a time when empires thrived across the globe. The Western Europeans were not the only ones to construct successful empires either. The Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman empires added to this phenomenon. Although these empires share many similarities, they also have their differences. During the time, 1450 CE -1750 CE, European empires in the Americas and their Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman counterparts are similar in that they all thrived and united diverse peoples and different in that European empires developed something entirely new, an interacting Atlantic World, while the other empires continued older patterns of historical development.

Read More

Differences Between The Roman Empire And The Han Dynasty

1525 Words | 7 Pages

The Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire shared many similarities and differences when it came to political rule and the nature of their political authority. The most significant difference between the two is how the Han dynasty enacted policies that were shaped to counter the wrongdoings of the previous Qin dynasty, whereas the Roman Empire enacted policies shaped to create and promote peace and stability. The difference in the two empire’s coming to power was to account for their variance in political rule. After the Qin dynasty, the Han ruled China for four centuries, enacting numerous political changes and governing one of the most efficacious dynasties in Chinese history.

Read More

Similarities Between Qing Dynasty And Ming Dynasty

376 Words | 2 Pages

Women are Jewels. They should be loved and protected. They are the mothers, the ones who give us life. They should be treated as equals, and that is not achieved through enslaving them. It is achieved through seeing them as another person, through seeing them as a whole person and not just as a lower gender.

Read More

Why The Gunpowder Empires Fell

728 Words | 3 Pages

The Gunpowder Empires. More specifically, the Muslim Gunpowder Empires: Ottoman, Mughal, and Safavid. All three existed during roughly the same time period, from 1500-1800 (though there is an exception with the Ottoman Empire); and they all existed around the same place in the world. They all used gunpowder for war and expansion. They were all predominantly Muslim, or at least ruled by such.

Read More

The Zhou Dynasty: The Unification Of Ancient China

556 Words | 3 Pages

This kept the people of China from ever considering to standing up to their ruler. Whereas the people of India were able to live more lenient lives. Until the death of the ruler Qin it remained this way. The next dynasty was The Glorious Han Dynasty. The ruler of this dynasty was of peasant origin and was not as harsh as his predecessor.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Ashoka And Shi Huangdi

632 Words | 3 Pages

Two men, both similar and different, each had a unique governing style. From a time of chaotic strive within their nations; each had a way to subside such conflict. In the Classical Age, Ashoka and Shi Huangdi had similar governing styles, in that they had a similar political and economic vision of success for their empire; however differed in philosophies that influenced their governing styles because Ashoka eventually renounced his brutality and became a peaceful and tolerant ruler. Through-out each man’s rule, walls stretching the length of an empire and towers of stone were built, but the means by which they were created varied greatly. Under Ashoka and Shi Huangdi’s rule extensive building projects were carried out.

Read More

Soft Power In The Mauryan Empire

259 Words | 2 Pages

Soft power in the Mauryan Empire Soft power helped the leaders of the Mauryan Empire maintain legitimacy because they valued a pluralistic society which allowed the people to be diverse. The Maurya Empire when first founded by Chandragupta Maurya c. 320 B.C.E. Chandragupta’s son ruled after he had finished his sentence and had not ruled different from his father. The final ruler was Chandragupta’s grandson Ashoka, he chose a different way of ruling yet included many of the same values. After Chandragupta divided his empire into districts, the society remained diverse. The people of his indian empire preserved their identities, values, and languages.

Read More

More about Similarities Between Han China And India

Related Topics

Open Document