Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of feudalism on europe
Short note about European feudalism
European feudalism opinion essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of feudalism on europe
Short note about European feudalism
European feudalism opinion essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The following is a compilation of the two countries, and their versions of the feudal system. Feudal Japan and feudal Europe had contrasting social hierarchies. Feudal Europe’s hierarchy was based on religion and wealth, whereas feudal Japan’s hierarchy was based on military and necessities (Doc A). Lords in Japan were not a
Nihal Lalwani BBE 29 October 2014 8 History Essay Term 4 Assignment Tokugawa Japan (1600-1868) and Medieval Europe (590-1500) both grew in two separate sides of the world but both of them are similar in ways such as how they were run, their architecture, their warriors and the society. In discussing whether these two civilisations are similar, the research has led me to believe that these two civilisations are partly similar. There are many similarities between Japanese and Medieval European Castles such as what were they used for and how they worked. Medieval European Castles are similar to Japanese castles as they are used for similar reasons and architecture such as the castles had high walls for protection against arrows, both of them were used as outposts by respective lords of each civilisation (Friar, 2003. P.47).
Underneath the nobles and barons, there are knights that are trained from the age of 7. In return for service to the nobles and barons, they are given grants of land. The peasants and serfs are on the bottom of the social system, there are peasants who farm the land in return for shelter and protection (history.com). This compares with
Feudalism was a key component of life for those in both Western Europe and Japan. The two systems developed independently from each other yet still held a multitude of similarities. However, their many differences out shadow the unique parallels they shared. The major discrepancies between the two are found in each’s code, structure and regulations. Documents nine and ten, break down the feudal structures of Western Europe and Japan.
They had the least wealth and respect but without them the two kingdoms couldn’t continue. There were three sub-categories of peasants in both societies: Farmers were the wealthiest peasants as they had their own land where they would dwell and also harvest crops to sell to the rest of the kingdom. The craftsmen/artisans were the second wealthiest peasants. They would craft armour and weapons and make work with metal and wood. The merchants were the least wealthy of all the peasants because they were completely dependent on other people to give them work.
These relationships were called feudalism (Doc. 1). Feudalism and the Church greatly contributed to the social, economic, and political life in Europe in the Middle Ages. “Feudalism was a political, economic, and social system which included kings, nobles, knights, and serfs (Doc. 1).” Every position or status had a job that benefitted another ranking (Doc. 1). For example, a king grants land to nobles, nobles granted land to knights, and knights grant land to serfs (Doc. 1).
Both civic establishments created inflexible social chains of command with a solid political ruler at the top, trailed by a decision made out of political guides and other government authorities, clerical class, and an expert class of dealers and other talented laborer and skilled workers. A large portion of the general population framed a worker class of unskilled workers and ranchers. At the highest point of the social pyramid of Egypt was the pharaoh with the administration authorities, nobles and clerics beneath him/her. The third level comprised of the recorders and warriors with the white collar class in the fourth level. Laborers were the fifth level of society with slaves making up the most reduced social class.
According to charts from various sources, samurai and knights are around the same rankings in a social pyramid (Doc. A). Both the samurai and knight are lower in the social pyramids at the time. They were both paid for their service with land from the lord he was working for. Another similarity is said in “The Heart of a Warrior: Origins and Religious Background of the Samurai System in Feudal Japan,” by Catharina Blomberg.
The social latter consist of the emperor being at the top, followed by the kings who were distant relatives of the family clan with the name “Liu.” Nobles classified under the kings and then
The first and highest of them all were the Gentry, consist of the wealthy landowners, then the Peasants, next were the farmers. Farmers make up 90% of the population, as farming was the most common job as the wealthymen owned land. Then comes the craftsmen and the merchants, are the lowest social class as their income comes from other wealth. With the different social classes , it come with an Emperor, who controls and maintain all citizens privileges. In addition, like other past empires, men were seen as the more dominant gender than women.
Introduction From 700 A.D to 1400 A.D, feudalism was the way society was ruled. God and the king had all the power during the Middle Ages. Peasants and serfs were the lowest class. Your family history and wealth determined your class level.
Feudalism in Japan had many similarities and differences with feudalism in Europe. Comparing the social structures and the cultures that the two powers presented can show us how alike and how different they are from each other. Feudal Japan and Feudal Europe were similar in many ways, such as having a religious figurehead at the very top of the feudal pyramid. Japan had the Tennō (Emperor) and Europe had the Pope. They also shared a similar pyramid of power, with the previously mentioned religious figureheads at the very top, and descending down with the Kings and Shoguns, the Vassals and Daimyo, the Knights and Samurai, and ending with the peasants.
In Ancient Egypt and the Aztec empire, there was a social pyramid with the least wealthy people, the slaves, at the bottom. (“Aztec Social Structure”), and the ruler at the top. In Egypt, this was the Pharaoh (Gill and Troolin). And in the Aztec empire, this was the Tlatoani (“Aztec Political Structure”), similar to how the Central Registry has just one person at the top while there are many who are inferior to him (Saramago, 1).
In conclusion, the ancient civilizations of Egypt, Rome and China maintained a strict social hierarchy, which was important for running stable, progressive and well-culturally preserved societies. The key elements that played a role in achieving that were the well-defined social order, the substantial social and economic inequality and the distinctive social norms. In each of the three civilizations, the classes were visible and there was no room for chaos, because strict laws were in place. Inequality ensured the movement forward, but social norms provided order and kept the hierarchical pyramid in place. Without the vital feature of the social hierarchy, it would not be possible for the societies to preserve their traditions and ensure continuity
The society was highly stratified; and included the Pharaohs, high priests, priests and viziers, other royalties, traders, farmers, artisans, common people and