Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A literature essay on a dystopian society
A literature essay on a dystopian society
A literature essay on a dystopian society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In these two different worlds many similarities are found such as their unique ability to disclose the natural human emotions. Both “The Giver” and the film “Pleasantville” have many aspects and morels the main being the power of knowledge distributed to the characters and how they choose to use their certain position and to their own or others advantages. How one’s individuality and creativity is explored throughout their life. As well as what it means to be a human fitting in with their community or
The setting of both novels takes place in a futuristic time period. I know this because in The House of the Scorpion, they are cloning humans; which has not been successfully completed yet. The Giver occurs in a future time period too, because they can control what the character's see and the weather, what the know and other things like that. The setting of The Giver is a utopian community where everything is “perfect”.
When we compare the dystopian/utopian film, The Giver, and the dystopian novel Fahrenheit 451, it's clear that there are some similarities and some differences. Though some are very difficult to find, there are others that are very obvious. The three obvious topics are, the way the characters cope or try to change their situation, the setting of the book, and the government or leaders that they both have. First and foremost, there are similarities and differences between the characters in both works.
If there were to be one book I would preserve for the future, it would be The Giver by Lois Lowry. This book shows many examples of what could go wrong in a Utopian society, and the importance of feelings and memories. The Giver is closely related to Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, regarding the background of the story. I chose The Giver because it shows how Utopian societies can easily fall apart, how little details in life such as the color of nature, and how if someone has no pain or feelings they are not living a well quality life. The Giver shows that memories and small details in your life are more important than you thought they were.
Release was a method in The Giver through which the community tried to cleansed itself of impurities by killing off the undesirables with a lethal injection. Because of the government's obsession with creating a flawless world, they raised the children from the moment they were born to hold the greater good of society above all else including life. Therefore, the people did not question the idea of killing infants because the child did not meet the standards or disposing of the elderly once they were no longer of use to the
What would your perfect society be? Some people will say that their society's government is in the wrong, most people say that the way their society functions is wrong and some people will realize that their society is treating a certain group of people wrong . The concept of a perfect or Utopian society is not an achievable goal because as we see in so many literary pieces such as the Giver and Fahrenheit 451 at least one person disagrees with the values of the society. Some people believe that their society's government is in the wrong.
Everyone is happy about release because they have no strong feelings. Another way the community's daily lives are different from ours is the people living in the Giver’s society also lead very strict and plain lives. No one can go out after dark; there are very few household items. Page 74 states, “There were the necessary reference volumes that each household contained: a dictionary, and the thick community volume which contained descriptions of every office, factory, building, and committee. And the Book of Rules, of course.
The Giver and other dystopian novels like Fahrenheit 451 have some similarities and differences in the story line. First, The Giver and Fahrenheit 451 both share the fact that people are being controlled on the amount of knowledge that they know. Additionally, both societies have no idea of how they came to be. On the other hand, in The Giver Jonas slowly starts to realize that something about him is changing because he can see the color red but, in Fahrenheit 451 Guy Montag just wants to take a risk because of his curiosity. Second, in Fahrenheit 451, Montag is a “firefighter” except, in his society he starts the fire instead of putting them out, while in The Giver the jobs/assignments are practical for everyday life in the community.
The Release in The Giver is a heavy topic, and weighs such importance in the novel. It is illegal for an aircraft to fly over a community, and when an pilot had unintentionally had flown over twice, he was sentenced to the Release. Like the death sentence in our society, the Release is an euthanasia that kills the victims of the injection. However, the novel’s perfect society is clueless of the whereabouts of the injection, and instead think that the Release is the sentence to Elsewhere- what they believe their utopia is. Public humiliation is also another from of correcting one from their mistakes.
What if there were no rules in a dystopian community? We live in a world without the overstated rules, without order, without having to be impeccable, but we have freedom an individuality. “Dystopia” is defined as a fictional world where people live under a highly controlled totalitarian system, where individual identity is suppressed and families no longer exist. Rules and orders are negatively portrayed in dystopian societies and are acclaimed to take away the freedom, choice, and individuality. Henceforth, to inhibit the control within the community, the rules should be restricted.
This will be backed up by information provided from the novel and my research. Tradition and customs appears frequently throughout the The Giver. The theme is portrayed as being used to to conceal what should be painful in the community. Death is therefore shown as a fictional “release.” The community in The Giver is where adults are under strict rules of traditions and customs just as much as children.
Unit 1 Test Is the community in “The Giver” a utopia or is it a dystopia? From reliable sources it is a dystopian community. For one, sameness is a thing, they have no free will, and have lack of any knowledge. Sameness is basically is when a person or more can not see any color. The reason sameness exist for “The Giver’s” world is because the head of their community wanted to make peace for their lives.
This occurrence is what keeps us from having the same dull emotions at the characters in this book. Modern day society does not have the same rules and regulations as Lowry describes. In a dystopian community, the citizens are lied to and know nothing, so they have no idea of their full potential. Although, present day society is not perfect, we are not blind to the reality of how the world operates unlike the people in The Giver. If modern society were to try to function as a Utopia, the result is clear that it could not be
In Lois Lowry’s novel The Giver that is the reality. The catch? The catch is freedom. There is no room for being different, no room for spontaneity, no room for experimentation and breaking the rules.
Finally, they get rid of many different activities they don 't like. But in our world, we have all these things, and they will never be taken away from us. This was my final example of our differences between The Giver and our society. There are some similarities between The Giver and our society, but there are many more differences, like families, rules, and personal freedoms. I think that our societies will never be the same because we are two different societies we always change.