ipl-logo

Similarities Between The House System At Trinity In The 1920's

438 Words2 Pages

There are a lot more differences than similarities. This statement is particularly meant for the buildings in our school and how they have changed. Also there are some similarities with discipline that wouldn’t apply to any other school in Melbourne.
The house system at Trinity in the 1920’s had a lot of similarities rather than differences whilst compared to 2017. These similarities are within the traditions, most houses have been inducting new members by making them drink a fluid in which is the colour of the house. Also places like meeting spots, the fact that all boarders going into a particular house. All these traditions have been kept and cherished by house leaders. But there are some differences within the system, the addition of houses, as in the 1920’s there were 4 houses whilst there is now 8. The original four houses were made by headmaster Frank Shann, who established the house system at Trinity for a “fresh rivalry” between peers. One of the biggest rivalries between houses is the ‘Roberts’ and ‘Kent Hughes’ rivalry. The …show more content…

In the early 1900’s, corporal punishment was a very common practise among all schools. Corporal punishment was allowed to be committed by teachers in almost every situation, but at Trinity there was a different story. Only the headmaster was allowed to commit corporal punishment and if so, “on extreme occasions”. Although the government has since banned corporal punishment for non-government schools in 2006. Other states are still yet to take action and corporal punishment is still allowed in non-government schools. Whilst corporal punishment in government schools was banned in the 1980’s. In the 1920’s Trinity was regarded as a very “soft” school, but the fact that Trinity didn’t allow a lot of corporal punishment shows how far ahead of the world Trinity

Open Document