Sulla also saw the potential in Pompey, who would become a military and political leader in the later Roman republic, and offered him many military missions. The legacy of Sulla lived on in him, as Pompey aimed to enforce the existing law reforms Sulla had made to the constitution of the Roman Republic, stating 'If Sulla could, why can't I?', according to Cicero. Despite Sulla's reforms not lasting long, he still had a large impact on the fall on the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman
Sallust, a highly regarded Roman historian, commented that “…fear of its enemies preserved the food morals of the state, but when the people were relived of this fear, the favourite vices of prosperity-licence and pride-appeared as a natural consequence”. This is corroborated by Florus, a criticized Roman historian and poet “The next hundred years were unhappy and deplorable because of internal calamities. The resources and wealth gained in our conquests spoiled the morals of the age and ruined the state, which was engulfed in its own vices as in a common sewer”. Both Sallust and Florus explain how Tiberius’ death caused the senate to resort to violence in order to keep their power. Consequently, the peace in Rome was disturbed and eventually led to the fall of Rome.
WT Notebook Journal 2 During the period of the Early Empire, Roman expansion and change marked the end of the Roman Republic. Growth changed the ideal of the republic and new problems surfaced within Rome itself. Increase power in the Senate which led to a less democratic society and increase military power for the Greeks as well as civil wars between Rome and the provinces were some of the political changes that were prompted by Roman expansion. Socio-economical changes like high taxes due to the wars and movement towards cities, increase unemployment, and income disparity caused by the dispute between patricians and the plebeian were promoted by Roman expansion.
Augustus Caesar impacted the development of the Roman Empire by gaining popularity as a powerful dictator, bringing a period of Pax Romana (Roman Peace), and creating a Hellenistic Culture. One aspect of Augustus Caesar was that he had gained popularity and was seen as a great leader/dictator by the community and the government
He managed to hold up Rome with his strength and character for his lifetime. The senate felt threatened by him so they killed him. There was a wide range of emotions and it started many civil wars. This completely caused a change in the government, and borught about the Roman Empire. Afterwards Octavian became the emperor that the new Roman Empire needed.
The Roman government had much power, as it could do many things, and carry out a variety of tasks. For example, they had the power to direct the military and government, pass laws, control finances, and
Sulla also marked his opponents for death, seized their property, and declared their children ineligible for public office during his reign of Rome. Before retiring, Sulla increased the memberships of the Senate to six hundred in the attempt to reduce
He was successful in being the dominant power during the civil war. During this war there was a gap of power in the higher state axioms. Sulla was able to reactivate the old and respected ordinance of the interregnum and to initially declare himself as interrex. To achieve his political goals, he was later self-proclaimed dictator, a post he held for four years (82-79 BC). In 83 BC he started wildly pursuing the democrats that supported Marius.
Many different internal and external pressures lead to the destruction of the Roman Republic. Cornelius Sulla, a Roman general, dictator and optimate, anticipated and was aware of the results of many powerful and
Many of the reliable valid sources that describe Marius and Sulla comes from the writings of Plutarch. He is a biographer and philosopher in his ancient Greek time, who was fortunate enough to experience and describe the downfall of the roman republic and key political figures in roman times. He will be the main source of evidence for these sources. I will also be further questioning the reliability of this source and if there is any case of him being biased towards one or another. Firstly I will discuss the lives of both Marius and Sulla briefly, then I will discuss the main differences between these two against each other and against other key political figures before their time in office.
decay of Rome has been frequently ascribed to the translation of the seat of empire; but this history has already shown that the powers of government were divided rather than removed.”. Caesar had the support of the people which led for him to have his own army and start a civil war against the senate and Pompieus. Marius and Sulla were the first people to use mob violence as a political instrument. Sulla was the first person to march on Rome with an army. And he was the first Dictator for life of Rome until he retired.
There was widespread bribery and personal abuse of government positions. Corruption spread in government and society and led to a loss of confidence in political institutions. 5. Social division: There was a great division between the aristocrats and the common people in the Roman Republic. Ordinary people have long resisted greater rights and political participation, but changes have been slow and limited, and this has led to increased tensions and unrest.
Sulla’s rise to power was significant with his dictatorship forming an important part of Ancient Roman history and the demise of the republic. Lucius Cornelius Sulla was born into a patrician family however he was not born into wealth this came later in life. In 107BC Sulla entered the political field serving as praetor to Marius who was the consul at the time. From this role, Sulla began to make his way up Rome political spectrum. Whilst in the office as praetor Sulla demonstrated his administrative ability and would later demonstrate his military ability this enabled Sulla to secure absolute power of Rome for many years.
The senate, aiming to avoid execution, allowed Sulla to become a dictator, an act that was supposed to be only temporary, which gave him permanent immunity from prosecution. Sulla’s career revealed that war went from defending the republic to acquiring wealth and social
For starters, he is the reason the Roman Republic fell and the Roman Empire rose. Despite the rise of the empire was a relatively good geographical outcome, the fact that it was governed by a dictatorship, created a few problems. One being that most Romans were not in favor of a monarchical life. But, when he came into power the first thing that he did was make extreme cutbacks on the Senate. This can also be a result of his power thirst.
