Socrates Vs Plato Research Paper

1412 Words6 Pages

"A good decision in based on knowledge and not on numbers" this is a famous quote said by Plato. He thinks that what creates you as a whole and lead you to success is not how much money you have but how much knowledge you have. Plato sustains that happiness is the goal of all performs and that it is attained through the search for virtues by following a moral conduct that will lead to a good soul, and a step towards perfection. Plato states that in life we will have to pass hard and unhappy times to get to be happy, because happiness doesn't come by itself.

However we measure our quality of life by the values and standards if the society we live in; therefore our "success" can differ greatly from one society to another, butt is often associated …show more content…

The "unity of the virtues" of plato justify a definite conception if the good life. Then they talk about what Definitions are, he says that first of all definitions presuppose that there is a definable object it means that you can't define something that changes all the time and they constitute the basis of knowledge. In the euthypro plato wanted to be optimistic and that dialogs are no longer developed in a negative way. We are in presence of "the holy""the beautiful""the just" or the " equal". Plato has decided to apply his knowledge in mathematics into this new science called philosophy. What consisted in a new miss if thought for him. Platos theory if the form ("phaedo") suggests that everything is what it is by participating in the correct form, by looking at the capability of the consequences. That's why Socrates hypothesis are not sufficient because he isolates each ideal object. Platos warns against the contamination of the soul(corruption).Socrates has a negative attitude towards nature while plato had a positive one. When Plato wrote "The republic" he talked about the political, psychological and metaphysical concepts. Socrates wasn't that good at talking so when he wanted to convince the audience of something he couldn't talk because people won't agree with