More handpicked essays just for you.
The effectiveness of standardized testing
Does standardized testing have negative effects on education
Negative aspects of standardized testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effectiveness of standardized testing
Proponents see standardized testing as a way of making testing more efficient and effective by minimizing cost and increasing people’s accountability for their performance in the system. Opponents on the other hand argue that the systems has limitations based on its very nature on what can be tested and as a result of these standards needing to be met sacrifice some very important aspects of students education experience as well as force onto students and teachers a one size fits all model that has failed to deliver on its promises. After having reviewed all the evidence in detail it becomes clear to me that standardized testing is not an effective system for educating students and does more bad than good
Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s “In A Year of 13 Moons” was yet another risk taking film to produce and, as an audience member, watch. The film was released in 1978 so the fact that it has a protagonist, who was a cross dresser, really set this film apart. Usually films with this theme will make it very comedic, however Fassbinder uses lots of visual to express the emotion, and takes audience members on this journey to look deep into the characters. There were one scene when the character Erwin, played by Volker Spengler, was giving dialogue however while walking through a slaughterhouse. This scene was hard to watch but in fact was needed because what he was saying had a connection to every moment in the slaughterhouse.
The tests narrow down the curriculum to focus on the subjects that are on the test, forgetting about the other subjects. Standardized tests cannot measure all that schools teach like how to be a problem solver. Standardized tests have not improved America’s education system. Every once in a while the world will submit their schools performance and they will be ranked with
The Legacy of Chemical Warfare Before World War I, chemical warfare was relatively unheard of and looked upon as taboo when using it in war or combat. It was not until the attack of the Germans did soldiers become aware of the deadly effects of chemical weapons such as Mustard gas and Phosgene gas. After the Germans, the French began to develop chemical weapons, then leading to the whole world becoming involved in this new type of warfare. But it was not the short term effects that were so future altering, it would be the long term effects. Warfare sciences began to change instantly as there was a new focus on chemical weapons, leading to world changing weapons such as nuclear bombs.
One of the biggest flaws is standardized testing has not improved student achievement. " Despite using them for several decades, policymakers and educators do not yet know how to use test-based incentives to consistently generate positive effects on achievement and to improve education." So if these tests aren’t improving our students, then why do we have them? I believe we need to change the tests or improve them somehow so that we do see some sort of improvement. Tests are very crucial to education because they show what a student knows, if we took these tests out completely then we would have no idea if students are improving or declining.
Standardized testing assesses a student’s individual performance and does not consider exterior factors. Test achievement plays a big part on those factors. Something as simple as a cold on the day of testing may prevent a student from performing well on test day. Pretest anxiety is also a common occurrence for many students. “Standardized testing only evaluates the individual performance of the student instead of the overall growth of that student over the course of the year.
As reported by the Office of Work/Life of the Columbia University there are both pros and cons of standardized testing. They state that the main benefit is that these tests make schools and teachers accountable, and that they should teach what students need to know for these tests. This, however, has a con; teachers may lose jobs and schools may be even shut if students repeatedly, which will put extreme pressure on both parties, in turn, causing them to teach only what would be necessary, hindering a student’s potential. Another pro included in this report is the ability that it gives educational boards to evaluate sub-groups and develop programs so as to better educate them. Standardized tests also allow parents to see how their children are doing in school compared to the country, state, or municipality.
Pictured this: a bird, a monkey, an elephant, a fish in a fish bowl, a seal, and a dog all in a front facing line standing in front of a tree and facing a man at a desk-most likely signifying a teacher-. The teacher gives the instructions “For a fair selection everybody has to take the same exam: Please climb that tree”. This is a basic implication of how standardized testing is not the answer to better America’s education. Not only are these government mandated tests not improving education and negatively effecting teachers and students, but they are also inaccurate and can be easily altered. There are two types of standardized tests, the aptitude and the achievement.
Standardized testing cost states over one billion dollars a year or a quarter of one percent of the total of K-12 spending in the United States. (Ujifusa) Standardized testing is supposed to sort large number of students in an efficient manner. The main idea of standardized testing procedures is to provide colleges and universities, secondary, and even primary schools with a better understanding and clarification in evaluating perspectives of students who graduated with academic standards from an abundance of diverse schools. Among these testing procedures that measure students skills, learning disabilities and their knowledge of abilities were first introduced in the United States during the 20th century. While Standardized testing have
Nevertheless, these claims are inconsequential because these tests still are non-accurate evaluations of knowledge and learning and serve to create disadvantages for students as well as for teachers. Therefore, U.S. Department of Education should do away with standardized testing. In conclusion, standardized testing may have its benefits, but as a determinant factor should be done away with. These tests have been proven to hinder students’ learning in the classroom, and do not equally measure every kind of intelligence.
I think standardized test really help you recall everything you 've learned about. I think students take standardized test because it helps them remember everything they have studied about. The purpose is so they don 't forget what they were taught. I think they can be useful for helping you with future things you will learn about. I don 't think there are problems with standardized test I think they are good for refreshing your learning skills.
Thesis statement: Standardized testing is not beneficial to K-12 education in the United States. Definitions: Standardized test: Any form of test that requires all test takers to answer the same questions, in the same way, and that is scored in a consistent manner, which makes it possible to compare the relative performance of individual students. Beneficial: Favorable or advantageous; resulting in good. K-12 education: A short form for the publicly-supported school grades prior to college.
These tests are putting too much pressure on a student, which can lead to anxiety causing them to mess up and fail or even drop out before they are given the test because they’re not good at tests and don’t want to try to get told they failed after 4years. Standardized tests are an unreliable measure of a student’s performance. Performance simply means an action or process of carrying out or accomplishing an action, task, or function. Why should I let a test tell me what I know? I feel like standardized test are more for the school then for us.
My first reason supporting that schools are placing too much emphasis on standardized testing is that schools make too much unnecessary tests. Schools have annual testing and if the school did not get good test scores they would suffer severe consequences. Sadly, the poor test takers or students that were so frustrated preparing for the test. Would be reflect on the teacher and the school. These excessive bad grades will lead the school to being closed down and a lost jobs.
Standardized tests are tests that are used to compare the relative performance of individual students or groups of students. A standardized test requires all test takers to answer the same questions, or a selection of questions from a common bank of questions, and is scored in a “standard” or consistent manner. These questions are usually in a multiple-choice or true and false format which can be scored quickly and consistently, but can also include short-answer questions, essay questions, or a mix of question types which are more time-consuming to evaluate consistently. Previously, standardized tests were paper-based, for instance OMR sheets were used for multiple choice tests where test takers were required to fill in their choices using pencils and these answer sheets were then read by OMR machines. Some tests are still paper-based but as technology advances, standardized tests are increasingly being administered on computers connected to online programs that make correction easier, quicker and relatively inexpensive.
