Stevenson's Case Analysis

340 Words2 Pages
Stevenson’s central claim is that the United States justice system in its current state is flawed and unrepresentative of the population. He talks about how he got a phone call about McMillain’s case and as told by the judge not to take it, he gives a montage-esque description of him trying his best to acquit falsely accused people on death row, and details the way he was stopped and abused by police officers and the lack of ramifications after moving into his new house. Being a lawyer who fights specifically for these cases gives him a reason to be completely educated in that topic, to prove his points further he uses national statistics, personal experience, and historical examples that relate to events unfolding in society today. For