ipl-logo

Stolen Misconception: The Pundit Fallacy By David Leonhardt

730 Words3 Pages

A Stolen Misconception
An article based upon a fallacy is deemed to be quite intriguing when an esteemed journalist is the writer. David Leonhardt, the author of The Pundit Fallacy, further interests the audience as he illustrates an extreme faulty within our society. Leonhardt is an Op-Ed columnist for The New York Times. He has won numerous awards as well as having previously worked for The Washington Post. Most of his articles typically involve modern political issues as well as news surrounding our current president.
In the article The Pundit Fallacy, David Leonhardt explains the balance between a journalist and a politician through a coined phrase, known as “The Pundit Fallacy”. The fallacy most nearly represents how politicians can improve …show more content…

In the beginning, I sympathized toward the cause of the children, and I agreed with the author. His pathos allowed me to agree with him and disagree with the actions of the Republicans. Moreover, as the author explained the Pundit Fallacy, I also had a positive reaction as he stated that he tried to avoid the fallacy in his writing. I believe that the avoidance of this fallacy is quite honorable, considering many politicians and journalists like to use one another to gain the attention or vote of the public. Furthermore, the end of the article drew up a negative reaction, for Leonhardt stated that the Republican opinion was false, and this was merely based upon the fact that the man was a Republican. This kind of judgement is not just, and it is quite unprofessional for a writer to use such language especially when an article will be posted under the name of a company. Additionally, some comments that the author made were unsupported with statistics, and I can not fully verify any of these comments. Despite these errors, the majority of the article contained accurate information as well as an argument that was developed quite

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of Clare Boothe Luce's Speech

771 Words | 4 Pages

During a meeting of the 1960 Women’s National Press Club, journalists from across the United States offered a chance for a well-known journalist and politician by the name of Clare Boothe Luce to speak about the significance of journalistic integrity. During this speech, she criticized the tendency of the press to write false articles about catchy new stories to gain popularity and more money from people reading them; however, she also knew that her topic would be a rather controversial one to speak about, so she prepared well. In the opening of her speech, Luce utilizes a variety of rhetorical devices and strategies to not only persuade her audience to listen to her message and hear her out but take it in stride as well as improve upon themselves

Read More

Summary Of Quit Comparing Trump To Hitler By Michael Lind

908 Words | 4 Pages

Glen Beck, a conservative radio host who I had no knowledge of prior to the article, is focused on for a full paragraph to show an example of media participating in the Hitler-comparison fiasco. Lind then discredits Beck's statement by bringing up Beck's history

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Crooks And Liars And Townhall

1499 Words | 6 Pages

To make sense of current news and media, it is crucial to understand the importance of techniques that authors use to attract their target audience. Crooks and Liars is a progressive news and media site that uses liberal content and other strategies to appeal to Democrats. Conversely, Townhall is a conservative news site that uses Republican content and similar strategies to attract a Republican audience. Although they express different views, Crooks and Liars and Townhall use the same strategies, logical fallacies and rhetorical appeals, to reach their target audiences. The logical fallacy, ad hominem, is committed throughout multiple articles in Crooks and Liars where an author uses irrelevant arguments to attack a person rather than attacking the issues.

Read More

Noah Rothman's Essay 'Taking Sides In Ferguson'

917 Words | 4 Pages

Stories are no longer respectable and virtuous as they were at modern journalism’s beginning. Thus, by journalists Fallows and Rothman have named the media as unethical. Another way that modern journalists have transformed today’s media is that the media now relies on the popularity of its stories and articles. Journalist Jack Shafer uses his article, “The Rise and the Fall of the Obama Media Romance” as an example of popular opinion reflecting

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Tragedy At Newtown By LZ Granderson

1234 Words | 5 Pages

He first tries to get at the reader's emotions by bringing up the Tragedy at Newtown throughout the article. Most people know that when they see Sandy Hook or Tragedy at Newtown they first thinks about the children that died at an elementary school from a school shooter. He tells the reader about the law that was up for a vote that would allow teachers to carry guns with more training, but ends that sentence with “It was approved the day before the shootings in Newtown” (cnn). Not only does he bring up Newtown, but brings up the Colorado theater shooting that happened. He states a quote from the Colorado governor in which he basically says that he was surprised that with all the people in the theater that no one had a conceal and carry and could have stopped the shooter.

Read More

Politicians Don T Pander Summary

531 Words | 3 Pages

According to the article, Politicians Don’t Pander, the authors believe that politicians don’t pander, politicians speak to the audience that will listen to them. Public officials, in the authors opinion, will use the audience that agrees with their views and make sure that the fifty percent, plus one people they need to get elected for something listens to them and fully agrees with them. Basically, politicians try to shape public opinion to sway to their views. "Politicians track public opinion not to make policy but rather to determine how to craft their public presentations and win public support for the policies they and their public supporters favor," this quote really represents what Lawrence Jacobs, and Robert Shapiro are trying to get across. Politicians figure out what group of people will agree with his or her statements and use them to be the majority to get

Read More

Summary Of The Things People Say By Elizabeth Kolbert

1333 Words | 6 Pages

In Jones’ article “Finding the good argument or why bother with logic” she expresses her belief on what an argument 's purpose is; “the possibility you might change your mind, learn something new, or solve a problem”. Kolbert’s intention in this article is to educate her audience. Kolbert is aware of her audience and molds her argument to fit the type. Kolbert keeps them on her side while also hinting at the problems within their own group. Her main message of the article is not “republicans are evil and spread rumors” her argument is more based on the spread of rumors through the internet criticising both groups while it may be more obvious that she is criticising republicans in reality the main point of the article is to enlighten her audience on their own faults while still keeping them on her side.

Read More

Larry Nassar In The Courtroom

932 Words | 4 Pages

This article was written by Common Dreams Staff and published by Common Dreams. The article describes how the father of 3 victims of larry nassar, tries to attack Nassar in court after being denied a minute alone with him. The article was bias because the author seemed to point to one side of the situation, which was the father’s side. The author used opinions in certain ways rather than facts which also makes me think this article was in fact bias. This article is credible because Common Dreams is a highly nationally used media source.

Read More

Overdiagnosed Adhd In Children Summary

898 Words | 4 Pages

The use of subtle suggestive wording and questionable phrases can be seen throughout the article, sapping some of the credibility that he gains from his credentials. The use of wording such as, “I think” and “I believe” at the end of the article to form a broad conclusion, such as “I believe this denial has indirectly contributed to high rates of school dropouts and unnecessary commitments to juvenile detention centers.”(12) With his target audience such far-reaching statements could be construed as unprofessional and extremely subjective considering that his credentials state that he worked in a juvenile detention center for 10 years. He limits himself by placing his article on a professional website, and explains the case in an overly subjective manner without any reason. It’s very confusing why he address’s professionals in such a simple manner, but there is no question that the content of the article is excellent and it was enjoyable to

Read More

Public Policy Chapter 4 Summary

369 Words | 2 Pages

The book also talks about the news media being one of the unofficial actors in our democracy. They have been at times important to the process to keep politicians accountable for their policies. In the next chapter we see how each of these unofficial actors plays a role in our Public Policy.

Read More

How Is Fallacies Used In 12 Angry Men

1783 Words | 8 Pages

Fallacies are used throughout the movie, but when the debate started, there are more uses of fallacies than towards the end, when the argument is almost developed. Fallacies are wrong or false beliefs that have little to no basis or evidence. The first use of this is when one of jurors says that all kids are liars and anything that kids say cannot not be trusted. There are many kids who are not liars. There are many children who do tell the truth and can

Read More

Summary Of The Article 'The Culture Of Shut Up'

1466 Words | 6 Pages

For example, at one point, the article is providing a general and positive aspect of the culture while at another point, it contradicts the same point and produces a new ideology as if the author retracted his opinion and attempted a new approach. This goes to show that the author is not even sure about his own placement within the opinions of the debate and therefore, his bias is senseless and without logic as well. This goes to say that the article could well prove to be illogical and invalid in current generations and in modern times. The fact that this may be true brings an alarming situation to the use of this article in such an era. Maybe it is used for a critical analysis but the article should not even have been published, unless the publishers deliberately decided to incite controversy in the

Read More

My Son Monologue

214 Words | 1 Pages

I hump back and forth viscously at my tootsie roll teddy bear repeatedly and then I hear, “What are you doing? Who taught you that?!” A voice of panic from my mom. i am eight years of age and I stay shut something my eyes can’t do as they release far more words than I can possibly express.

Read More

Method Of Analysis Paper

1343 Words | 6 Pages

When focusing on the ideological criticism approach I analyzed the artifact’s elements then articulate ideas, references, themes, or concepts that are suggested by the presented elements. During this part of the analysis I chose to compare the artifact’s elements to themes found in previous videos published by the rhetor. This was the beginning stage of my background research for the analysis. In addition to researching the rhetors examples, I investigated the credentials of the author. While doing so, I was able to find out what field of study Gilbert specializes in, where he completed his education and where he does his research work.

Read More

Fallacies In Critical Thinking

275 Words | 2 Pages

Fallacy is “a reasoning ‘trick’ that an author might use while trying to persuade you to accept a conclusion” (Browne and Keeley, 85). They are known to be tricks or illusions of thoughts. They are often sneaky and seen everywhere specifically in politics, editorials, commercials, or advertisements. There are three common characteristics a critical reader should be suspicious of: reasons that requires inaccurate or incorrect assumptions, diverting a reader by making information seem relevant to the conclusion when it is not, and support of a conclusion that is already proven (Browne and Keeley, 85). Identifying these three characteristics will prevent a critical reader from being influenced.

Read More

More about Stolen Misconception: The Pundit Fallacy By David Leonhardt

Related Topics

Open Document