Structural Model

In the focus of assessment, both the Bowen and Structural models suggest an essential concentration on evaluation. Then again, both models are somewhat dissimilar in assessment methodologies. The similarities between the Bowen model and the Structural model suggest they both regard the family structural unit as a point in theory and generational processes. Additionally, both theoretical concepts search for patterns. For example, the Bowenian counseling approach explores the intricate patterns and interactions of intergenerational behaviors amongst the family (Bowen Center for the Study of Family, 2018). However, the Structural family model examines patterns like the Bowen model does as behaviors that are emotional or mental. Therefore, they

Subsequently, a counselor determines the boundaries in part by assessing and accommodating the system. Observation of the family is essential if there is a need to diffuse boundaries if reactivity is high. Therefore, a Structural Counselor will try to modify the current structure while gaining more assessment, insight as well as may choose to instigate further enactments. Thus, the counselor’s observation in evaluation and technique can lead the family to evolve in family structure (Nichols,

In a study of highly experienced family therapists, Nichols & Fellenberg (2000) suggest findings on the use of enactments imply “breaking through family conflict and helping families shift their relational stance is a complicated process that requires active, directive facilitation by the therapist” (Nichols & Fellenberg, 2000). Counselors utilize live observation of the family to help clients modify their interactions. Structural family therapy is distinctive in that there is focus on the present and a brief assessment of past actions (Colapinto, 1982). Colapinto (1991) proposes that the Structural counselor is active in the therapy process and varies in intensity of involvement throughout therapy (Colapinto,